MSG Team's other articles

9145 Employee Etiquette – Codes of Conduct necessary for an Individual at Work

Etiquette refers to good manners required by an individual to find a place in the society and gain respect and appreciation from others. Individuals working in organizations to earn a living for themselves are called employees. It pays to be a little mature and sensible at the workplace. Avoid being too casual. Employee Etiquette Employee […]

9064 The Economics of Electronic Healthcare Records

Administrative costs form a major portion of the cost structure of any health care provider. In the case of the United States, administrative costs account for more than 20% of the total costs which need to be incurred in order to serve patients. It is for this reason that many healthcare organizations are trying to […]

11828 Things Employees Hide from Managers

Why do you think employees lie to their managers and superiors? There are several instances when employees feel compelled to hide the truth from their seniors. Let us go through some instances where the phrase “Honesty is the best policy” does not work. An employee will never tell his manager that the targets imposed on […]

12864 Conflict Management Skills

Conflict management plays a very important role in preventing conflicts among individuals. How does a conflict arise? When individuals strongly oppose each other’s opinions and ideas, the probability of a conflict arises. A conflict starts when individuals think on different lines and find it very difficult to accept each other’s ideas. Conflict must be avoided […]

12280 Advantages of Job order Costing

Possible To Appraise The Job: Job order costing is the only way that companies can appraise the jobs that they are about to take up. In the absence of a job order costing system, companies will not have enough data to ascertain whether or not the job will be profitable. Job order costing system enables […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the previous article, we have already seen that it is common for sporting franchises to raise significant amounts of debt funding. We also know that there are certain special characteristics of sports franchises that need to be taken into account before giving out loans to them.

One more such important characteristic of debt funding to sports franchises is the involvement of the franchisor in such deals. Generally, a loan agreement between any organization and a bank is a bilateral agreement. This means that the deal must be signed by both parties in order to be valid. However, this is not the case with sporting franchises.

The franchise agreements are often structured in such a way that the franchisors also have significant control over how the franchises manage their finances. Hence, this creates a unique situation wherein the banks have to be careful that any agreement being made between the bank and the franchise is also carefully vetted by the franchisor in order to make sure that it is valid as per their rules. Hence, the debt agreement between a bank and a sports franchise almost becomes a tri-party agreement.

In this article, we will have a closer look at the involvement of the franchisor at various stages of the debt funding process.

  1. Day to Day-to-Day Functioning: There are many sporting franchises across the world that limit the amount of debt that their franchises can take on the balance sheet.

    For instance, the NBA as well as the NFL, both of which are based in the United States, limit the amount of debt that their franchises can undertake. This is known as the debt ceiling.

    It is important for banks and other lending institutions to ensure that the sporting franchise remains compliant with these rules even after receiving the debt

  2. Resale of Loans: Sporting leagues want to ensure that they are in control regarding who their franchises owe money to. It is for this reason that sporting franchises have rules in place that limit the ability of the banks to resell their loans. If any loans have to be securitized and sold to parties other than those who originated the loans, the franchisor also needs to be notified.

    Generally, if it is purely a financial transaction i.e. one bank assigning a loan to the other, the sporting league does not object and allows the transfer to take place. However, if it is an attempt to gain control over certain assets of the league, then the franchisor may reject such a transfer.

    The main intention behind keeping this control is to ensure that “vulture funds” are not able to obtain ownership of the debt owed by the franchises. This will allow vulture funds to take control of the franchise operations which might be detrimental to the interests of the franchisor as well as other franchises in the league.

  3. Debt Default: We already know that banks take the assets of sporting franchises as collateral while giving out loans to them. Hence, ideally, if the franchise is not able to pay back the loan, then the lender should have the right to take possession of the collateralized asset and sell the same in order to recover their losses. However, many times, this may not be the case when it comes to sporting franchises. This is because the franchise is not really an independent company.

    The franchise derives its economic value because it is a part of the overall ecosystem that the franchisor has built. It is for this reason that franchisors also want to exert some control over the situation if a franchise is unable to pay down the debt.

    Unlike normal circumstances, the banks may not get complete control of the assets. This means that they may not be able to sell the franchise assets to the highest bidder in order to recover their dues.

    It is common for the sporting league to have the first right to dispose of the assets of the franchise in the event of a default. This means that if a team has defaulted on its debt, the franchisor will be given the option to find a suitable buyer for the league so that the debt owed to the third party can be paid off. Only if the league is unable to find a buyer, will the bank be able to take control of the assets and liquidate them on the open market.

The bottom line is that the franchisors realize that the economic value of any franchise is connected with others and the entire league as a whole. Hence, if they do not control the debt funding these franchises receive, they ultimately end up leaving the backdoor open to hostile takeovers. Hence, they create elaborate rules in order to prevent such loss of control.

However, the extent to which this control can be legally exercised by the franchisor is debatable. This is because some of the rules and regulations created by these franchisors are actually in violation of the bankruptcy code.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Cultural Influences on Financial Decisions

MSG Team

Currency Wars: “Beggar Thy Neighbor” Policy

MSG Team