MSG Team's other articles

12795 Common Threats to an Organization

What do you understand by threats to an organization? Threats refer to negative influences which not only hamper the productivity of an organization but also bring a bad name to it. Let us go through common threats faced by an organization. One of the most common threats faced by organization is employees with a negative […]

9553 Appointing Home Grown Leaders to the Top Posts versus Bringing in Leaders from Outside

One of the thorny issues facing senior management in many organizations is the debate over grooming leaders from within and then appointing them to the top posts versus brining in leaders from outside and then making them the CEO. The debate is not confined to a particular country and occupies the energies of corporate leaders […]

10378 Modern Theories of Motivation

We all are familiar with the classical theories of motivation, but they all are not empirically supported. As far as contemporary theories of motivation are concerned, all are well supported with evidences. Some of the contemporary/modern theories of motivation are explained below: ERG Theory McClelland’s Theory of Needs Goal Setting Theory Reinforcement Theory Equity Theory […]

8828 What is Motivation? – How to Inspire Peak Performance

Motivation is the word derived from the word ’motive’ which means needs, desires, wants or drives within the individuals. It is the process of stimulating people to actions to accomplish the goals. In the workplace, several psychological factors can drive motivation. Some psychological factors in workplace motivation are: desire for money success recognition job-satisfaction team […]

11846 What is Bureaucracy? – Definition and its Purpose

Definition and Purpose of Bureaucracy What comes to your mind when you encounter the term bureaucracy? More often than not, you would think of slow moving, obstacle filled, and tedious processes that do not get your job done but instead, make you run around from pillar to pillar for your work. Though most of us […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The political framework and the structure of the legal systems anywhere across the world depend on the concept of sovereignty. The idea owes its roots to the sixteenth and seventeenth century Europe and has existed since then and is ever expanding. Sovereignty is associated with authority which are embodied in organizations like nations and states which in turn are responsible for the territory under them and the people who live in these territories.

The idea of sovereignty was created not for academic discourses or philosophical purposes but for real world potent challenges. As mentioned earlier the idea owes its genesis to the political upheavals in Europe of the sixteenth and seventeenth century. The increasing power of the Pope who was the theocratic head of the Christian world led the rulers of Europe to assert their sovereignty over their land and people to escape papal authority.

Now, having understood the concept, let us now look at the two prominent schools of thoughts regarding Sovereignty.

The Monist view asserts that the State is the supreme social institution and has a unique place in comparison to other institutes and organizations. The spear-head of this view was Jean Bodin, a French philosopher and jurist, also a member of the Parliament of Paris. The France in which Bodin lived and worked was struggling from the aftermath of Protestant reformation and religious conflicts. Though a catholic himself, Bodin criticized the papal authority of the government and favored the unrestrained authority of the emperor; calling him the supreme law maker. Thomas Hobbes of England and J.J. Rousseau of France echoed similar views.

The Plurist view emerged as an alternative to the unidirectional and traditional monist view. As the times changed and the relevance of social groups and institutions increased within states and nations, there was a felt need to revisit the monist view of sovereignty in the changing world. According to the Plurist, the state needs to compete with the churches, trade unions, friendly societies, political parties etc as they too meet the requirements of their members. The pre eminence of the State over any of these institutions should be decided solely on the basis of the superiority of its moral appeal and nothing else.

The Plurist view brings into consideration several factors overlooked by the dogmatic monist view of sovereignty. The interest of the State may not be aligned with the interest of its parts always; also, the state cannot ignore the importance and relevance of other institutes and organizations functioning within its purview.

The Guild system of the medieval times, where each section of the workforce whether they be traders, artisans, craftsmen, all had their separate guilds and enjoyed autonomy, the state should try to maintain a federal structure.

Harold Laski, did some remarkable work in the areas of defining and explaining the concept of sovereignty in the changing times. A Grammar of Politics published in 1925 present some rather compelling arguments regarding the Plurist view. In addition to some of the aspects mentioned above he said that, the state is only one of the social institutions and that the areas of state authorities need to be defined so that it does not encroach on the autonomy of other institutes and groups. He later gave up the Plurist view in favor of more rational Fabian Socialism, where the state should focus and divert its activities towards pursuing public interests.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Concept of Property in Political Science

MSG Team

Are We Really Capitalists ?

MSG Team