MSG Team's other articles

12303 Advocacy and Volunteerism: Differences and Similarities

Difference between Advocacy and Volunteerism Non-profits across the world are divided into those that are advocacy oriented and those that volunteer their services for the public good. Advocacy groups often promote views and opinions of like-minded citizens regarding public policy and suggest specific courses of action that can be actualized. On the other hand, the […]

9470 Goal Setting Theory of Motivation

In 1960’s, Edwin Locke put forward the Goal-setting theory of motivation. This theory states that goal setting is essentially linked to task performance. It states that specific and challenging goals along with appropriate feedback contribute to higher and better task performance. In simple words, goals indicate and give direction to an employee about what needs […]

11346 Sources of Business Ethics

Ethics in general refers to a system of good and bad, moral and immoral, fair and unfair. It is a code of conduct that is supposed to align behaviors within an organization and the social framework. But the question that remains is, where and when did business ethics come into being? Primarily ethics in business […]

10664 Political Systems around the World and the Causes and Consequences of Gridlock

Political Systems and Gridlock around the world There are different types of political systems in different countries around the world. If the United States has a presidential direct election kind of system, the UK and India have parliamentary systems that are characterized by a mixture of direct and indirect elections. This means that the democratic […]

11559 Time Management in Corporates – Need and its Importance

Time Management refers to making the best possible use of time and doing the right thing at the right time. Managing time well plays a pivotal role in finishing off tasks within the stipulated time frame and also increases productivity of an individual. Employees must learn to manage time well at the workplace to achieve […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Performance appraisal is considered as a challenging task by many business managers. It becomes all the more daunting in case of virtual workplace.

With the virtual team members distributed globally and coming from different cultures and backgrounds, it is important to ensure that the entire process of performance evaluation is perceived as fair and upright by all the stakeholders.

Let us look at the below example to better understand where the real challenge lies:

    Steve Brown is a Module Lead in a reputed IT firm based in US. He has two software engineers reporting to him, Justin & Peter. Justin works out of the same office as that of Steve, while, Peter sits at another remote location.

    Steve has never met Peter face-to-face, though they regularly stay in touch through work-related emails and phone calls. On the other hand, Steve meets Justin everyday and they get more opportunities like coffee and lunch breaks to have casual discussions.

    During these sessions, Steve also gives informal feedback to Justin. Thus, Steve feels a higher degree of personal connect with Justin while he finds the talks with Peter more serious and mostly, task-oriented. Also, he never gets to see Peter’s working style, additional efforts or how long he stays in office etc.

    At the end of the year, when the time for performance review comes, Steve finds himself in a dilemma. He realizes that though both Justin and Peter have met their pre-defined goals but his opinions are favorably inclined towards Justin.

This usually happens because visual images have more profound impact on human mind. Thus we see from the above example that managers should think objectively for comparing and assessing the individual performance of co-located and virtual team members. Each process stage is equally critical for a fair and just performance appraisal.

The virtual team leader should set clear and precise SMART goals where S stands for Specific, M stands for measurable, A stands for attainable, R stands for realistic and T stands for time-specific.

All the goals have to be 100% result-oriented without any scope for subjective assessment. It is better to explicitly define all the success criteria in consultation with the team member at the project’s kick-off stage itself.

Both the leader and the team member should agree to the defined objectives. This would command greater commitment from the employee. The goals have to take into account team accountability as well as individual performance.

Team accountability goals will promote group interaction, team cohesion and collaborative efforts. The seven critical competencies of virtual team members (discussed earlier) should also be factored-in when deciding the goals.

The leader can monitor the performance of their virtual team members by using a combination of traditional methods like daily/weekly progress reports, frequent review meetings and keeping specific time for weekly informal feedback sessions & more innovative ones like tracking web activity and computer usage.

It is advisable to seek utmost discretion while adopting innovative performance monitoring approaches which usually jeopardize the trust demonstrated in the employees.

Rather than the single source assessment by the manager, it would be highly beneficial to use 360 degree performance assessment for virtual project teams. This gives a comprehensive picture with inputs from oneself, line manager, functional manager, project leader, client and team members.

Managers should not forget that the performance reviews serve as opportunities for giving and receiving feedback about goals achievement, creating individual development plans, providing inputs for reward & recognition program and defining future action plans.

None of these basic objectives should be neglected in cases of virtual team members.

A poorly done performance review makes the employee sitting at a far-flung location dissatisfied, hence decreasing his energy and motivation to perform.

How a performance review is completed by a manager has huge impact on the productivity levels of their team members.

For a successful virtual team, the onus lies on the leader to ensure that the good performance is recognized and fairly rewarded even if he has not met the individual in-person.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Critical Success Factors for Virtual Teams

MSG Team

Critical Competencies of Virtual Team Members

MSG Team

Managing Conflict in Virtual Teams

MSG Team