MSG Team's other articles

9152 Employee Relationship Management (ERM) through Information System

Introduction Employee relationship management is management of relationship between employees and employers. It is made up of initiatives which improve employee morale and loyalty towards the company. Employee relationship management approach looks to maintain effective relationship through three way approach of continuous communication, conflict resolution and employee development. Importance of Employee Relationship Management Employee is […]

12359 Are We Living in a Reality TV Like World? How Does This Impact Business and Society?

Whoever Controls the Narrative, Wins Look around and watch what is going in the world around us and you would find that things are not they seem to be. While our business and political leaders proclaim all is well in front of the cameras, the situation on the ground deteriorates. Indeed, the rise of charismatic […]

12489 BPI Exercise – Process Walk Through on the Floor

Business Process Improvement Projects have become a way of life with every Business Organization where they initiate these projects to elevate their internal operational efficiencies to achieve higher benchmark and to help them build an edge over competition. BPI projects help not only increase the efficiency of the operations, but benefit by reducing the cost […]

11943 Why the Chief Technology Officer has become so critical to the Success of Corporates?

The Transformation of the Role of the CTOs since the 1990s and to the Present Digital Age Until a decade or so, the CTO or the Chief Technology Officer used to be someone who was by name an executive position, but, in reality, was secondary to other execs including the finance and administration persons. Indeed, […]

12758 The Why and How of Cities Worldwide Competing in a Race to Attract Investments

The Global Race Between Cities for Investments Cities worldwide are in a global race for investments and this is being driven by economic, political, demographic, and social reasons. Considering the fact that the future of the world would be urban and cities would be the engines of the global economy, it is not surprising that […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The evolution of organization theories from mechanistic to people based ones has influenced the approaches taken by managers in organizations towards the firm as well as organizing people.

While the earlier decades of the 20th century witnessed the rise of the mechanistic of the rational approaches, since the 1970’s and particularly in the last decade of the 20th century, there has been a trend towards viewing organizations as interdependent, complex and chaotic. This has led to the adoption of the systems approach of organizations that embraces complexity and uncertainty.

However, many managers continue to take the rational approach which views people as building blocks and the organization as a machine leaving little scope for flexibility and adaptability to changes in the external environment (Baecker, 2006, 80).

This article considers the reasons for doing so and takes the position that managers would be better served to adopt the systems approach to deal with the challenges of the 21st century.

The rational approach to organizations is appealing to most managers because of the comfort factor in such an approach. It is common for managers to avoid complexity and ambiguity in their working environment and hence taking an approach that has been described as “being purposeful” which enables managers to work towards “specific goals” as the preferred alternative.

Further, the development of organizations in the 20th century has been such that many firms have tight structures with clearly defined hierarchies, command and control bureaucracies. This enables managers to take an approach that is “mechanistic” in nature and which thrives on formalization and standardization (Scott & Davis, 2007, 30).

Since this kind of organization structure was the norm across industries and sectors, many managers of the “old school” of management pioneered by Taylor, Weber and others preferred a rational approach which eschews uncertainty and embraces predictability (Beardwell, 2010, 76).

To consider examples of organizations that follow these rational approach in the real world and from a time span of the latter decades of the 20th century to the present, we find that the main difference in the way organizations approach HRM depends on the sector in which they operate and the period in time when they started their operations.

To take specific examples, the cases of GM (General Motors) and the United States Government along with the NHS (National Health Service) in the United Kingdom are instances of organizations that practice rational approaches to HRM and this is mainly due to the fact that these organizations have a well defined structure and are tightly coupled with clear boundaries with the environment in which they operate.

Hence, these organizations can be said to be practicing a rational approach to HRM that ties in well with their organizational mission and vision (Van De Van, 2006, 75).

The rational approach is particularly preferred by managers where there is top down decision making and the “strategic apex” plans the strategies, directs the execution and monitors the implementation. In these organizational structures, strategy is not emergent but rather planned consciously and elaborated in a step wise manner.

The organizations that have fixed structures and are machine like in their approach to people and processes are places where managers prefer the rational approach to organizations and organizing. Though this approach is now fading away because of the new emergence of organizational forms and where the interaction of the organization and the external environment is characterized by fluidity and uncertainty, there are still many managers who prefer this approach due to the “hangover” of the old school of thought (Boxall & Purcell, 2003, 91).

It must be mentioned that this rational or mechanistic approach served the managers of yesteryears well and the emphasis on the “technical” aspects of management like measuring the deliverables in clearly defined terms i.e. output of the machine, plant utilization, efficiency and productivity measured in mechanistic terms all contributed to the success of this approach which continues to deliver even to this day though emerging sectors like the IT (Information Technology) sector and the financial services sector have pioneered the open systems approach (Stern and Barley, 2006, 153).

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Costs in Project Management – Costs associated with the Projects

MSG Team

Communications Management during Project Planning

MSG Team

Bidding as an Essential Skill for Project Managers

MSG Team