MSG Team's other articles

11900 Understanding Tax Terminology: Tax Base

Many students often find tax policy confusing. This is probably because it uses complex terms. The tax base is one such term that is often used in tax literature. The meaning of this term is often not completely understood by tax students. This creates further confusion. In this article, we will clarify the meaning of […]

11858 Sustainable Growth Rate and the Du-Pont Analysis (PRAT Model)

We now have a basic understanding of the concept of sustainable growth rate and how it related to the valuation of any given firm. In this article, we will dig deeper in the same formula in an attempt to connect it with the famous Du-Pont model which is used worldwide to predict the Return On […]

9059 The Economics of Blue Bonds

Oceans account for over 70% of the surface area of the earth. This makes them important for life as well as for commerce. More than 90% of the international cargo around the world passes through water. Also, millions of people depend upon the ocean for their livelihood. Tourism and fishing and many other such occupations […]

11214 The Sears Bankruptcy

Sears has been one of the largest retailers in the world for many years now. The company has been in operation for about a century. Sears is one of the most widely known corporations in the world. Finally, in October 2018, Sears is now filing bankruptcy. Many investors were already expecting this move given the […]

11220 Securitization and Sports Finance

The business of sports can be asset-intensive and can lead to negative cash flows for a number of years. Sporting franchises have to shell out huge sums of money in order to build new stadiums and also to ensure that the best players are playing for their teams. Also, the legal structure as well as […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The Gordon growth model is a well known and widely known model for valuing equity securities. However, as with every model, there are some pros and cons that need to be understood before this model is applied. Understanding of these pros and cons will help differentiating between situations wherein it would be prudent to apply the Gordon growth model and situations wherein that would not be the case.

The points in favor of the Gordon growth model i.e. the pros have been listed first:

  • Simplicity:The Gordon growth model is extremely simple to explain and understand. It does not take too much intelligence to assume that the dividends are expected go an increasing at a constant rate. This simplicity is what makes this model widely understood and therefore widely used. More complex models have been proposed in place of the Gordon model. But the Gordon model has stood the test of time, because it mimics the dividend pattern exhibited by most companies and it does so while maintaining it’s simplicity.
  • Reverse Logic:Gordon growth model need not be applied only to find the correct intrinsic value of the share. Instead, given the current share price, a reverse analysis can be conducted and the growth rate being implied in the current market price can be found out. This helps in stating facts in a manner which is intuitively understandable. For instance, if the result of this backward analysis is that the dividends are expected to grow 20% year on year forever, then we know that this is not possible and the firm is overvalued. When the whole economy grows at an average of 3% to 5% per annum, how can a single firm continue to grow at 20% forever?
  • Scope:The Gordon growth model is applicable to most companies, especially if the company has a relatively mature and stable business. Also, the Gordon growth model can be used to find out if the indices are valued correctly or whether the market is amidst a bubble.

At the same time, the points against Gordon growth model i.e. the cons are as follows:

  • Precision Required:The Gordon growth model is highly sensitive to changes in inputs. For instance if you change the required rate of return (r) or the constant growth rate (g) even a little bit, then there will be a huge change in the resultant terminal value and therefore the value of the stock. Hence, for the model to be accurate, the inputs have to be forecasted very accurately. The problem is that these inputs cannot be forecasted with a great degree of precision by investors.
  • As such the Gordon growth model is susceptible to the “garbage in garbage out” syndrome. Even if slightly inaccurate assumptions are used, the results will be way off the mark!

  • Non Linear Growth Patterns: Also, the Gordon growth model assumes a constant growth rate. This makes the growth of the company’s dividends appear linear. In reality, empirical evidence has proven that dividend growth is seldom linear. The reason behind this is the existence of business cycles. During boom times, companies experience a surge in earnings and pay out generous dividends and during lean times they pay out lesser dividends. Of course, companies make an attempt to smoothen out these dividend payments. However, it is difficult if not impossible. Even the American telecom giant (AT&T) which has always been known for its impeccable dividend payouts had to cut dividends when it fell on rough times. Thus, the dividend payouts are non-linear to say the least and Gordon growth model may not be the best approximation.

To conclude, it would be apt to say that Gordon growth model has more pros than cons. Analysts must be careful to avoid the pitfalls associated with the use of the model. Overall, it is a handy tool to estimate the value of equity of any company.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Calculating Free Cash Flows: The Case of Preferred Shares

MSG Team

Calculating Free Cash Flow to Equity

MSG Team