MSG Team's other articles

12699 What are the Challenges in Leadership?

Being a leader is not quite a cakewalk. Infact, to be very honest; managing people is one of the most challenging tasks. You really need to extract the best out of your team members and handhold them even in the worst situations. We all want to lead a team, but have we ever realized what […]

8929 Difference Between a Team and a High-Performance Team

A team comprises of two or more than two people grouped to achieve a common objective or a goal. On the other hand, High-Performance Teams are objectively more focused in approach and better than the usual work teams. The members of a High-Performance Teamwork towards the achievement of synergies in business outcomes and attainment of […]

9977 International Business Ethics

International business ethics emerged quite late globally compared to the business ethics that came up in 1970’s. It was only in late 1990’s that the international business ethics came to the fore especially so after the economic developments that occurred on a global scale. In 1990’s many businesses from the developing countries expanded their operations […]

9489 Grapevine Communication

Download PPT for Complete Course on Grapevine Communication Total Slides: 44 Grapevine is an informal channel of business communication. It is called so because it stretches throughout the organization in all directions irrespective of the authority levels. Man as we know is a social animal. Despite existence of formal channels in an organization, the informal […]

10635 Persuasion and the Art of Changing Minds are Essential for Contemporary Leaders

Leadership is as much about having a vision and communicating it to the followers as it is about the art and science of changing minds of both the leaders and the followers. To explain this further, one needs to look at the contemporary business landscape where leaders have to not only be persuade but be […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the previous article, we have already seen that the scope of coverage of reinsurance policies can become quite complicated and open to interpretation. We now know that reinsurance policies are covered under three main different terms and conditions. However, over the years, there have been some complications have arisen in these different types of coverage. These complications have led to the creation of different variations of reinsurance policy coverage.

In this article, we will have a closer look at the various advanced scenarios which commonly arise in the process of reinsurance as well as the steps which are taken.

Interlocking Clause

The interlocking clause has been created to assist with the complications which arise when reinsurers reinsure policies based on a “risk attaching” basis. For reinsurance policies that were written on a risk-attaching basis, the period when the loss occurred is not important. Instead, the date on which the policy was issued is important.

For example, let’s assume that an insurance company has issued two motor insurance policies. One policy has been issued in 2020 whereas the other has been issued in 2021. Now, in the year 2022, the claim has arisen since there has been heavy flooding and both cars have been destroyed. Now, the date of the actual loss i.e. 2022 is irrelevant. The date on which the policies were issued i.e. the years 2020 and 2021 are considered important. Since they fall under two different policy years, two separate policies will apply for the same.

Now, the problem is that each reinsurance policy generally has a deductible. For example, the reinsurance policy only pays claims above $1 million. Now, the problem in the above-mentioned case is that the claim which arises from the same event will be split into two different years. Hence, the deductible limit of $1 million dollar will apply twice.

Let’s say that the total loss from both years is $1.5 million with 50% of the losses arising from policies underwritten in 2020 and the other 50% of the losses arising from policies underwritten in 2021. This means that in each of the policy years, the insurance company has faced a loss of $750,000. Since this is less than the deductible amount of $1 million, the reinsurance company might not pay even a single dollar even though the insurance company has lost $1.5 million from a single event!

In order to prevent such situations, the interlocking clause is included in many insurance contracts. The interlocking clause ensures that if the loss is arising from the same event, then the deductible amount is prorated.

This means that since both 2020 and 2021 contribute to 50% of the losses, the deductible amount in both years will be scaled down. This means that the $1 million deductible amount which was being considered earlier will be reduced to $500,000 for both years. Now, the reinsurer will have to make sure that they pay the claim which is in excess of $500,000 for each year.

In this hypothetical case, the claim is $750,000 for each year. Hence, the reinsurer will deduct $500,000 from each year. This means that they will pay $750,000 minus $500,000 which is $250,000 for each year. As a result, the insured will end up receiving a total claim of $500,000 because of the interlocking clause as opposed to $0 without it.

It is for this reason that insurance, as well as reinsurance companies, need to be aware of whether the interlocking clause is present in their policy so that they truly understand the coverage which they have.

Hybrids

Many times insurance companies are not satisfied with any one type of coverage. In such cases, it is common for insurance companies to negotiate with their reinsurance company and come up with a hybrid policy. One such hybrid policy which is famous is known as the runoff policy. This generally happens in the case of termination of the contract via any one of the parties.

It is common for insurance companies to have a reinsurance policy with “losses occurring during” coverage. However, if the policy is abruptly stopped, then the reinsurer will still be liable to make the claims of the existing policies for a certain predefined amount of time. In this case, the reinsurance policy essentially switches from a “losses occurring during” policy to a “risk attached during” policy.

There are several other such hybrids that are used by different insurance and reinsurance companies as per their own needs. The only problem with hybrid models is that it provides some specific options to one of the parties. Now, finding out the financial value of such options and including them in the contract pricing can be quite challenging. This is the reason why the pricing of hybrid reinsurance contracts is considered to be a tough task.

The bottom line is that the reinsurance industry is rapidly evolving. As such, the types of policies being offered as well as the specific coverage which they provide are also evolving at a fast pace. The hybrid coverage reinsurance policies are the result of this innovation and are likely to continue in the future.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Cyber Risk in Reinsurance

MSG Team

Combining Towers While Building a Reinsurance Portfolio

MSG Team

Climate Change and Reinsurance

MSG Team