MSG Team's other articles

10254 Managing Dissent in the Workplace in Polarised and Divisive and Volatile Times

It is Inevitable for Dissent and Debate to Happen in Corporates in These Volatile Times It is often thought that dissent and high pitched debates and discussions do not happen in corporates and other organisations where the workforce is thought to be highly disciplined and moreover, such entities often cite Human Resource (HR) policies to […]

9812 Implications of Workplace Changes for Individuals and Organizations

Career, as a series of upward moves of income, status, power and security has died long back. In 21st century, career is seen as continuous learning and changes in identity due to experience and personal learning along with upward moves in income, status and power. Employees, these days want a fulfilling career and organizations need […]

12388 Attrition and Compensation Management

Many studies have found that there is a direct causal linkage between the levels of compensation that a firm pays and the rate of attrition that it has. Attrition can be voluntary and involuntary, where the former is the employee quitting the company out of his or her own volition and the latter is the […]

9678 How the Armed Forces Actualize Management Excellence

The Reason why the Military Pioneers Innovations It has often been said that the Military and the Armed Forces in the developed West pioneered many technological and managerial innovations that subsequently helped the corporate sector in those countries. For instance, the Internet was initially a Department of Defense project in the United States that was […]

9160 What are Employee Training Manuals ?

Employees need to be trained on a regular basis to acquaint them with the latest developments, technologies, softwares and make them ready for unforeseen circumstances. Employee training manuals are small handbooks which are given to employees by training managers for their future reference. Employee training manual should include relevant information which would help employees enhance […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The Givers and Takers and the Rewards Systems

The previous articles discussed the theme of rewards and their uses in modern organizations from multiple perspectives. The focus of the discussion was on how an effective rewards management system can boost productivity and improve job satisfaction leading to all round benefits to the companies and their employees.

This article discusses the cutting edge research in rewards management that has been studied in a recent book, Give and Take, by the noted Wharton Professor, Adam Grant. This research that has been published in 2013 notes that organizations are made up of employees who can be classified as givers, takers, and matchers.

The givers are the ones who proactively help others and build great teams whereas the takers are the ones who are always receiving help instead of giving back to the team. The matchers are evenly poised with their attitude of giving as much as they take and nothing more.

The givers operate in high performance cultures where they help others, share knowledge, offer to mentor other employees, and make connections without expecting anything in return.

The takers dominated culture on the other hand thrives by expecting others to help them as much as possible without giving anything in return. Of course, the research showed that most organizations fall somewhere in between with an equal amount of give and take and hence, these cultures are known as matcher cultures.

Design Rewards Systems to Encourage the Givers and Screen out the Takers

The implications for rewards management are that the rewards systems must encourage employees to seek and provide help, and reward these employees more than the matchers or the takers, and should screen out the takers so that they do not garner a major share of the rewards. This is a sure fire formula for success in the modern workplace.

The key point here is that in an organizational culture that encourages reciprocity there are fewer conflicts between employees and the rewards management systems must be geared towards encouraging the employees to both seek and provide assistance.

In many multinationals during the induction training, employees are told to not keep knowledge to themselves like they did in college and remember that now they are operating in a team environment where knowledge is to be shared instead of horded. The rewards systems likewise are tailored to ensure that the givers are encouraged and those who are selfish are sidelined.

Closing Thoughts

Of course, it is easier said than done to implement giver cultures as the research proved. Employees most often struggle to make the transition from a competitive culture to a cooperative culture since the incentives are still aligned to results.

Hence, the implications for organizations are that their performance appraisals and rewards systems must include bonuses for those who contribute to the team the most and this has been proved in the research as well.

Finally, organizations must not view the rewards system as a zero sum game where the balance between the givers and the takers evens out. Instead, the rewards systems must be designed in a manner that would create synergies between the teams.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The Problem with ESOP’s

MSG Team

Towards a Total Rewards Management System

MSG Team

Role of Bonuses in Rewards Management

MSG Team