The COSO Framework for Internal Control
February 12, 2025
Another very important model of communication is the Helical Model of communication. The Helical Model of communication was proposed by Frank Dance in 1967 to throw some more light on communication process. Dance thought of communication process similar to helix. What is a Helix? A Helix is nothing but a smooth curve just like a […]
Last year Bob Stuart was given the ‘Best Team Leader’ award because his team had delivered all the milestones accurately and on-time. Along with the award, he was also a given a greater responsibility of leading a bigger and more diverse team whose members were located in 3 different countries. But this year not only […]
Crisis refers to a sequence of unwanted events leading to major disturbances at the workplace. It triggers a feeling of insecurity and fear amongst the employees. Crisis causes major harm to the organization and poses a threat to its reputation and brand image. Let us go through various ways of managing stress during crisis: Once […]
The concept of value at risk (VaR) is closely connected with the concept of market risk mitigation. This is why the discussion about one invariably turns to a discussion about the other. The concept of value at risk (VaR) was developed by many financial institutions as they wanted to know how volatile their portfolio was. […]
It has been well established that people with strong communication skills perform better at workplace, primarily for the reason that they can manage people effectively, whether clients, colleagues or bosses. However, like any other skill, communication skill can be honed and developed. Managers who spend time in developing this skill in their teams, reap benefits […]
The policy of risk management is unique to every organization. Practices that may be considered acceptable in one organization may not be considered acceptable in another organization.
Just like the vision and mission of any company, its risk management policy is also unique. This is a basic document, which is drawn up when the risk management policy of a company is being put into place. It can be considered to be like a constitution since all decisions related to the risk management practices in any company emanate from this document.
Since an organization is made up of several stakeholders, it is important for all those stakeholders to get aligned on the same path so that the risk management policy can be drawn up.
This article explains what a risk management policy is as well as the different steps that need to be taken to draw up a risk management policy.
The primary purpose of a risk policy is to ensure that the organization has a commonly agreed-upon risk management framework in place. This framework has to be developed after due consultation by all stakeholders.
The risk appetite of all stakeholders needs to be matched with the probable outcomes of different risk levels. It is the job of the organization to do a thorough scan of the various risks that an organization faces during this time. The operational and regulatory framework needs to be thoroughly studied before reaching any final conclusions.
Risk management is an imperfect science. This means that there are several different ways that can be used to measure risks. These different methods are likely to give different results.
Hence, if there is no consensus about the mechanisms which have to be used in order to value risk and control it, there will be chaos. It is likely that the management will change the methods repeatedly based on what suits their decisions.
Hence, just like accounting policy decisions, changes in the decisions regarding measurement and valuation of receipt need to be vetted carefully. The valuation methods used for tracking, measuring, and subsequent reporting of risks should be the same to ensure that the results are comparable across the years.
In the previous articles, we have repeatedly mentioned that risk management is not a perfect activity. This means that it is not possible to completely eliminate risk.
Since the whole process is about dealing with imperfection, it is important to define what success means and codify it in the risk management policy. In the absence of such codification, different stakeholders in the risk management policy will have different interpretations of success.
The communication of performance goals and then the subsequent measurement of performance will become vague if the concept of success is not aligned and codified.
It is possible that the definition of success may change over the period of time. Hence, it is recommended that the definition be revised from time to time.
In the previous step, the company defined certain outcomes that they would be in their interests. At the same time, it is also important to clearly define the outcomes and situations which would not be acceptable to the company. This lack of acceptability could be due to the core cultural values of the company or due to financial constraints.
Regardless, it is important to clarify particular situations such as catastrophe risks, brand risks, and other such risks which must be avoided at all costs. These definitions define the priority areas for the risk management team. They now know that these risks are the most critical ones and need to be managed carefully in any case.
The risk management policy also needs to clearly outline the possible constraints that a company is likely to face while applying its risk management strategies. These could be constraints related to finances, personnel, or even culture. This step will ensure that the risk management strategy prepared is practical and can be strictly implemented. It is important for the risk management team to know the boundaries inside which they need to operate.
The end result of the entire process is to define a baseline risk level. This baseline level will be defined using valuations that will remain consistent across the company and across different time periods. This definition will be used as a guide to mediate between conflicting goals of stakeholders.
For instance, equity shareholders might want the company to take more risks so that their return is increased. However, debt holders get a constant rate of return. Hence, they may see the additional risk as jeopardizing their interest without adding any value to them.
The risk management policy should be able to mediate between such disputes. It should clearly define the baseline level of risk using which such disputes can be objectively settled.
The bottom line is that the risk management policy is the central policy document that needs to be put into place before a risk management department is set up. This document should guide the organization through difficult decisions and should serve as a bible for actions related to risk management.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *