MSG Team's other articles

12414 Basics of Pet Insurance

People in the developed world have an affinity for pets. This is the reason why two-thirds of American households, i.e. around 80 million households have pets. All of us are aware that the costs of healthcare are rising exponentially in America and in other developed countries such as the UK. Similarly, the cost of veterinary […]

9233 The Ever Shortening Business Cycles and What They Mean for Business Leaders

How the Modern Forms of Annual Reporting and Business Cycles Came into Being The advent of the modern form of the corporation ushered in several changes in the way corporations and business entities are run and managed. While hitherto, it was possible for feudal lords and highly wealthy individuals to own large businesses and trading […]

9686 How to Address Career Gaps and Other Career Weaknesses in Your Resume

What is career break or career Gap? Career gap is a time period when you are no longer associated with any organization after leaving one. A gap of 2-3 months is not very astonishing but more than 6 months or year surely raises a red flag in recruiter’s view. People often take a break either […]

11417 Strategies for Improving Communication in High-Performance Teams

High-Performance teams can be of various types depending upon the objectives or the goals which are required to be fulfilled, which can be distinguished on the basis of the characteristics. Communication is the most pertinent factor which determines the level of cohesion or effectiveness of a team. According to the research study conducted by Ashridge […]

10217 Management by Objectives (MBO) – Meaning, Need and its Limitations

An effective management goes a long way in extracting the best out of employees and make them work as a single unit towards a common goal. The term Management by Objectives was coined by Peter Drucker in 1954. What is Management by Objective ? The process of setting objectives in the organization to give a […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Scenario analysis is the third pillar of the framework suggested by the Bank of International Settlements in their Basel norms.

In the previous articles, we have already studied a collection of internal and external loss data as well as the self-assessment of risks. However, it is important to note that the loss data collection framework has certain shortcomings.

  1. Firstly, it does not take into account losses that are beyond the mentioned time period.

    For instance, companies generally maintain loss data for three years. However, if a loss is likely to happen once in ten years, that risk is completely missed out on the loss data framework.

  2. Secondly, “loss data” only considers losses that have actually materialized.

Scenario analysis, on the other hand, takes into account losses that may not have occurred till now but which have the potential to occur in the future. This is the main benefit of scenario analysis. They help the company identify emerging risks that are not The methodology used for scenario analysis is much more comprehensive.

The internal position of the company is studied in addition to the vulnerabilities posed by the external situation.

In this article, we will have a closer look at how scenario analysis works as well as what the shortcomings of this scenario analysis are.

Approaches to Scenario Analysis

There are three approaches that are commonly used by organizations to generate scenarios required for scenario analysis. They have been mentioned below:

  1. Structured Workshops: Scenario analysis is a tool that is used to identify and mitigate risks that do not exist until now. Since there are no past records of the risks, only experts can help in identifying these risks. This is the reason why scenario analysis is mostly performed with the help of a group of experts.

    Many companies conduct structured workshops where they invite many experts in various fields related to their operations.

    The company also creates structured questionnaires which are aimed at exploring the possible risks that a company faces.

    The objective of this workshop is to stimulate a dialogue between the various experts who express their opinion about various subjects and in the process discover new possible risks and scenarios.

  2. Surveys: Many companies may not have the time or the budget to host a conference. In such cases, they provide structured questionnaires separately to the experts.

    The objective is the same i.e. to elicit an expert response. However, here the experts give their individual opinion since they are not able to interact with the other experts as they would have done in a structured workshop.

  3. Interviews: Lastly, many organizations prefer to have interviews with experts.

    The characteristics of these interviews are the fact that they are unstructured. This means that there is no structured manner in which the discussion is being driven. Instead, the organization may decide to interview the experts one-on-one or they may have a group discussion with some experts while having an individual conversation with some others.

The end result of each of these exercises is that the company needs to have a new list of risks that have been identified in the process.

Scenario Analysis in risk Management

The real challenge is the next step wherein these risks have to be converted into numbers. Various statistical techniques are used to do so.

For instance, expert opinion is collected about the possible frequency of these losses along with the possible impact. These numbers are then blended in with the empirical distributions and used to generate more detailed data.

Limitations of Scenario Analysis

Although scenario analysis is an excellent tool to identify and mitigate operational risk, it is still based exclusively on the opinion of the experts.

If a different set of experts was used to perform the same scenario analysis, the outcome would be significantly different. The effectiveness of the process is completely dependent upon the human beings performing it.

This is the reason why all the cognitive biases play a part in the scenario analysis. For instance, there have been studies which show that if the same experts were presented information in a different order, their opinions were different!

The familiarity of the experts with certain types of risks also plays an important part. Experts tend to focus more on risks that they know about and ignore the risks that are new to them.

Also, many times experts have a predefined opinion to which they are anchored to. Instead of having an open mind about the new data, they often use the new data points to support their old positions. Many times experts might disagree with one another. However, they will still not voice their disagreement because it would mean confronting others and some people may not want to do that.

The bottom line is that scenario analysis is a very important tool used in the advanced measurement approach suggested by the Bank of International Settlements. Despite its shortcomings, it is the only method that can be reliably used to manage the unknown risks in any organization’s operations.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team

The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

MSG Team

Credit Derivatives: An Introduction

MSG Team