Executive Pay: The Curious Case of Carlos Ghosn’s Arrest
February 12, 2025
One of the most important purposes of development of computer systems was the database application which could have been used on them. Data processing drove growth of computer processor speed. In fact, data processing predates the computers; punched cards were used in the US for collecting data for census during beginning of 20th century. Earliest […]
Why Indian Professionals need to Change Their Work Habits In recent years, there has been much talk about how India is emerging as a global powerhouse and an engine for economic growth on a global scale. Indeed, with the liberalization of the Indian Economy in the 1990s and the subsequent waves of reform, there has […]
Introduction: The Ethical Imperative for Project Managers While Ethics are important for all organizations and their employees and other stakeholders, they are more important for project managers who execute complex projects and interact with a wide variety of stakeholders. Indeed, being ethical and following ethical norms can be said to be prerequisites for project managers […]
As Supply Chain Activities are evolving and partnering changes in business models, the focus and activities are not restricted to the management of raw materials and finished goods from point of origin from the vendors to plants and further on to the end customers. There is another extension to Supply Chain Process called as Reverse […]
Human Resource (HR): Though the pay rolls preparation through bespoke systems is one of the early adoptions of application software in many organizations, HR module was mostly left out by them, during their early phase of implementation of ERP system, apparently due to routine nature of HR functions, involving mostly some staffing activities. However, need […]
Automation is changing the world that we live in at an increasing pace. With each passing day, the capabilities of robots are increasing more and more. They are becoming a sort of pseudo human race as they have acquired almost all the thinking capacity that a human has.
With giant strides in technology taking place, companies are now able to automate tasks that were previously thought to be impossible to automate.
This may seem like a wealth of opportunity to the entrepreneurial class. However, for the average worker, this is a severe threat. It is likely to make them redundant in the next 10 years or so. To prevent this from happening and to ensure that humans and robots have a level playing field, Bill Gates, the wealthiest man in the world has proposed that we tax the robots. Some people think this is a good idea whereas others think it is ridiculous.
In this article, we will weigh the pros and cons of automation to come to a conclusion whether robots should actually be taxed!
The point in favor for taxing the robots is that they will affect the people from the lowest strata the most. Jobs that require less intelligence are easier to automate. Consider the case of driverless cars being tested by Google.
If the experiment is a success, it will be a blow to millions of cab workers worldwide. Also, millions of drivers who work in the logistic industry will be unemployed.
Jobs like these where workers make slightly more than minimum wage are the most under threat. Even in Amazon’s new store, there are no staff members at checkout counters. Low pay retail jobs are also under threat!
Bill Gates is of the opinion that the field is currently tilted in favor of robots. This is because when employers pay their workers a certain sum of money both are supposed to pay taxes, making it expensive to hire workers.
On the other hand, when employers spend on workers there are no taxes at all! It is cheaper to hire robots than it is to hire people. Also, the burden of taxes like social security, Medicaid, etc. falls disproportionately on the lower wage workers.
Bill Gates believes that the amount of money that employers spend on automating the process should be taxed. All this money should be put into a common fund. This fund must then be used to distribute money to every member of the society.
Since people from the lowest strata of the society are likely to lose their jobs due to automation, they are the ones whose incomes should be supplemented.
The flaw with Bill Gates argument is that it has a regressive thought process. Technology does cause disruption in the short run and leads to loss of jobs. However, in the long run, humanity is better off as a result of technology.
Consider the case of the printing press during the industrial revolution. If printing press was taxed during its inception, it would have pushed back humanity by several years.
Technology should be viewed as complementing the workforce. It will extinguish low-end jobs that require no brain and a lot of labor. Instead, it will create high-end jobs, and everyone will be better off.
The governments should focus their efforts on training the workforce to take high-end jobs rather than trying to implement regressive tax regimes that would impede development.
It is not that automation would take away money and jobs from all humans. It would just be a redistribution of wealth from the poor to the wealthy.
Technical people who tell the machines what to do will make a lot of money and so will the people who own the machines. Hence, people with a socialistic bend of mind tend to argue that the purchase of robots needs to be taxed. The problem with this proposal is that it does not make sense.
Firstly, how would you define a robot! Even computers replace human effort, and so does the fan hanging on your ceiling. If every form of machine that reduces human effort is taxed, that would amount to a tax on capital investments.
Taxing capital investments is the equivalent of financial suicide for an economy as it deters growth and creation of new jobs. Rather it breeds stagnation and is almost certain to lead to a recession if it is implemented over a larger period of time.
Lastly, Bill Gates’ proposal is impossible to execute in real life. It is not possible to accurate the differential earning that a robot would generate over a worker.
The wages that have to be paid to the worker, as well as the productivity of the robot, are both uncertain. As a result, it would be difficult to accurately determine the tax base over which taxes have to be levied. Also, it is possible that the manufacturers bundle software with hardware and make it very difficult to determine which product should be taxed and which shouldn’t be.
To sum it up, taxing the robots is a regressive strategy which if implemented is likely to cause more harm than good.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *