How Cutting Edge Technologies can Enable Better and More Efficient Decision Making
How Successive Waves of Technological Change Led to Better Career Related Decisions With each iteration of technological change, decision making, whether professional or personal or business related and governmental policy related, gets better and more efficient. This is because decision making in any context thrives on information and when information and better data are available […]
Key Risk Indicators
The fourth and last step for risk management suggested by the Bank of International Settlements in its Basel Norms is the continuous monitoring of key risk indicators. Key risk indicators are important metrics that can track the business environment and internal control factors. They can help an organization keep track of a rapidly changing internal […]
Organizational Vision, Mission, Strategy and Change Management
Organizational vision & mission, provide a sense of purpose or establish the the reason of existence of an organization. According to Sullivan & Harper 1996, a well-defined organizational vision establishes both long term and short term goals, empower and motivate leaders as well as followers in implementing change and strengthening their adaptive mechanisms for staying […]
Metrics to Measure Credit Risk
In order to manage any type of risk, it becomes important to measure it. Now, credit risks manifest in different forms within an organization and within its environment. It is for this reason, it is important to know that there is no direct way to measure credit risk. Instead, any organization has to look at […]
Structural Functional Approach to Public Administration
The structural functional approach to public administration is a term adapted from sociology and anthropology which interprets society as a structure with interrelated parts. This approach was developed by the celebrated anthropologist Malinowski and Radcliff Brown. So, according to them, a society has a structure and functions. These functions are norms, customs, traditions and institutions […]
In the previous article, we have explained why regulation is important for the insurance industry. We have also understood how the focus of regulation has changed from merely restricting prices to protecting the rights of the consumer. In this article, we will have a closer look at the solvency regulations i.e. the rules regulators create to ensure that insurance companies do not go bankrupt.
It needs to be understood that the financial services industry is a closed loop. Hence, bankruptcy of one company also ends up severely affecting the other companies. Hence, solvency is not the company’s private matter. This is the reason why companies which manufacture goods and service do not have to follow regulations while utilizing their capital, while financial services like insurance companies have to!
The way insurance companies deploy the funds that they receive via premium is highly regulated. Some of the principles that form the basis of solvency regulation are as follows:
The question is what constitutes an adequate amount of cash. All over the world, regulators are the ones who determine the minimum capital that needs to be kept on hand in order to pay claims. Insurance companies are obligated to maintain at least the amount of cash specified by the regulator. Failure to do so can lead to fines, penalties and even disbarment in the long term.
It is the responsibility of the regulator to ensure that the rules are set in a fair and unbiased manner.
It is for this reason that the formula to calculate the minimum capital requirements needs to be same for all companies.
However, the formula does have factors such as size of the company, its current financial position and the riskiness of their investments. This is the reason why different companies may have different amounts that they need to maintain as minimum capital. In some countries like the United States, there might be different minimum capital requirements at state and the federal level. In such cases, federal laws supersede the state laws.
As long as the asset was AAA+ rated by credit agencies, insurance companies were allowed to invest money in them. As a result, many insurance companies were left holding mortgage backed securities during the 2008 financial meltdown. This incident almost bankrupted AIG which sent alarm bells ringing as far as insurance regulators were concerned.
Ever since the AIG incident, insurance companies have now started taking more interest in where insurance companies invest their money. There are various limits and sub-limits regarding the asset classes where the money can be parked. The regulators want to ensure that some of the money is available in liquid form.
Hence, the mandate holding of some cash equivalents. Also, they want to ensure that all the money is not concentrated in few asset classes. This would expose the insurance company to unnecessary risk.
The very basis of insurance is risk diversification. As such, it is only understandable that insurance companies themselves would want to hold a diversified portfolio. The insurance regulators also keep an eye on risks such as interest rate risk and counterparty risks and ask the insurance company to change their asset portfolios accordingly.
The regulators ensure that there is genuine pooling of risks via reinsurance. This means that they have rules to check that the reinsurance is not being done by an overseas branch of the same company. Also, the regulators want to ensure that the risk is not contained within the same country. This is the reason why regulators insist that some of the risk be transferred to overseas companies. However, it is also the job of the regulators to ensure that these overseas companies are financially stable to take on the risk.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
