MSG Team's other articles

12365 Arguments against Tax Competition

Proponents of the free market generally believe that competition is good for the economy. They argue in favor of the competition every time. Hence, it is natural for them to feel that competition in taxes is also good. The general argument is that competition forces the governments to rationalize and become more efficient. However, there […]

8973 Disadvantages of Securitization in Sports

In the previous articles, we have already seen how the use of securitization has grown in sports. We also know that the increasing use of securitization is because of certain benefits that are provided by this method of raising capital. However, it is important to note that securitization is a part of structured finance. Structured […]

9532 Heuristics and their role in Finance

Traditional financial theories assume that finance is a scientific field. This means that just like in a scientific problem, a perfect solution exists even for financial problems as well. According to them, investors have the necessary resources and are capable of finding a solution to every problem in the financial domain. In reality, this is […]

10553 Over the Counter Derivatives Regulation

The derivatives markets all over the world have been under fire after the 2008 crisis. There is increasing clamor and an increasing number of people are asking for the regulation of derivatives. In this article, we will study about the efforts undertaken to bring about this regulation as well as the challenges that are faced […]

11671 Types of Hedge Funds

Hedge funds are simply funds with high leverage and no regulation. They have come into existence in the past couple of decades or so. However, a lot of fund managers have used different strategies and different asset classes. The result is a proliferation of the types of hedge funds. The modern investor therefore has a […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The field of strategy is not an exact science. This is because strategies are made based on the assumptions that an individual or a group of people have about the future.

It is for this reason that if different people undertake the activity of strategic financial management, they are likely to come up with different results. As a result, the output from the strategic financial management process can be quite diverse.

Therefore, some guiding principles have been created to ensure that there is some form of standardization across various organizations. The basic principles which govern the implementation of strategic financial management have been listed in this article.

Principle #1: Matching Resources with Objectives

While implementing the principles of strategic financial management, an organization must be aware of the quantum of resources that it is likely to control in the long run. The company should also have a clear picture of the proportion in which these assets will be deployed across their portfolio.

The deployment of current resources has to be based on the final objective. Strategic investments are expensive to modify. For instance, it is difficult and expensive to shut down a factory after it has been set up. The financial experts help in understanding the level of projected economic activity in the future and how the resources can be best organized.

Principle #2: Maintaining Productive Capacity In Order To Meet Current Objectives

The field of strategic financial management is long-term in nature. However, the firm has to stay solvent in the short term for it to meet its long-term objectives. Hence, strategic financial management has to operate within the bounds of solvency.

A company should not continue making excessive investments, which would lead to cash burn in the short run, even if such research and development promise to make the company a market leader in the future.

If the cash burn continues unabated, the organization may find itself in a precarious position facing a hostile takeover. Hence current minimum objectives must be met. After meeting the basic objectives, the firm is free to deploy the excess cash flow with a longer time frame in mind.

Principle #3: Keeping an Eye on Financing

The investing decision may appear to be the key decision when it comes to strategic financial management. However, the financing decision is also equally important (if not more important).

Companies implementing strategic financial management should be aware that capital is a finite resource. They should be aware of the various sources of funding that they have at their disposal. They should also be aware of the cost of each of these sources of funding.

Companies generally have a target capital structure which they want to follow in the long run. The use of this target financial structure helps in tying up the short-term financing decisions with the long-term strategic decisions. It helps integrate the process of strategy and financial management.

Strategic financial management suggests that companies always maintain a debt ceiling beyond which borrowing should be strongly discouraged.

Principle #4: Evaluating Strategic Alternatives

Companies should continuously monitor their strategic alternatives. This includes using strategies such as partnerships and even outsourcing in order to meet their long-term objectives.

In some cases, outsourcing may even seem expensive in the short run. However, it gives the organization the opportunity to scale its operations up and down at will. This option is valuable to many firms as they would rather invest their capital in their core activities instead of spending it on building manufacturing hubs.

Similarly, many companies use franchising to grow in the long term. They are able to gain more market share even though it means a loss of control and division of profits in the short run.

The guiding principle here is that a company must try to maximize the upside in the long run while minimizing what the downside risks can be. Also, when companies view their relationships with other organizations as long-term partnerships, they are less likely to be transactional in nature.

The strategic financial management philosophy emphasizes the use of tools such as a balanced scorecard. These tools can be modified in order to inculcate the financial aspect into the stated objectives.

Principle #5: Integration of Financial Strategy with Other Strategies

The purpose of strategic financial management is to ensure that the financial objectives of the company are in line with its other strategies. In a traditional financial management context, financial decisions are made only by financial managers. However, strategic financial management emphasizes that the company must have deeper communication channels. It discourages working in silos.

According to this philosophy, there is nothing called a financial decision. The financial decision is just the spending of financial resources in the strategic interests of the firm. Since the strategic interests are shared across the firm, the decisions must also be shared.

These above-mentioned five principles serve as guiding pillars across organizations. This helps strategic financial management to follow the same path even though the implementation may vary across organizations.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Strategic Finance and the Outsourcing Decision

MSG Team

The Strategic Financial Planning Process

MSG Team

What is Strategic Budgeting?

MSG Team