MSG Team's other articles

9477 Essentials/Features of a Good Motivation System

Motivation is a state of mind. High motivation leads to high morale and greater production. A motivated employee gives his best to the organization. He stays loyal and committed to the organization. A sound motivation system in an organization should have the following features: Superior performance should be reasonably rewarded and should be duely acknowledged. […]

12731 Ten Important Characteristics of High-Performance Work Teams

High-Performance work teams comprise a group of highly talented and motivated professionals working together for the achievement of a common goal or business objectives. High-Performance teams assure the highest levels of performance and productivity, unlike average teams by leveraging the business resources optimally and making best utilisation of the available talents or competencies. Such teams […]

9796 Impact of Quantitative Easing Tapering on Various Stakeholders

The Quantitative Easing (QE) policy has impacted the lives of pretty much everybody on this planet. The reverse policy of Quantitative Easing (QE) tapering is also expected to have a similar wide range effect on the lives of millions of people. Some of them may be positively affected by the Quantitative Easing (QE) tapering policy […]

12952 The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

Insurance is one of the most regulated industries in the world. Also, there are multiple players which offer every type of insurance. As a result, the competitive pressures are very high. This ensures that the insurance companies are not able to charge exorbitant premiums. Almost every insurance company across the world is a price taker […]

12279 Dividend Discount Model: Advantages

Dividend discount models are the first type of discounted cash flow models that we will study. The model simply discounts cash flows at a given rate just like any other DCF model. The difference lies in the fact that dividend discount models consider only “dividends” as being legitimate cash flows. Therefore, if a firm pays […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

What could be the biggest source of competitive advantage to an organization in the current era of cut throat competition? If I asked this question a decade or two decade, the answer would have been something like - ‘it’s the technology’, ‘its global presence’, ‘its customer perception’ etc. All of them can be a potential source of competitive advantage to any organization even now. But the common answer today would be ‘the people’.

Yes, it’s the people that can be and that are the single biggest source of competitive advantage to organizations nowadays. Top executives globally are one in their view that the quality of people onboard decides your present and the future. Great mission and vision statements appear futile if the talent pool or skill inventory of an organization is not good and vice versa.

But since when have people become of strategic importance to organizations? They always were! But time demanded no reckoning of this fact. Organizations in the fast were progressing at standard rates and talent was developed at similar pace and consequentially there was no dearth.

But with the advent of globalization that has thrown open global market places, organizations and industries are growing at blistering pace. It is getting difficult to develop people at the same pace. The heat is being felt equally at the top as well as bottom level positions. There is shortage of skilled workers are the lower level and an equal dearth of people in leadership positions.

What’s more, organizations fail to understand how to retain the existent talent, compensation (financial and otherwise), rewards and recognition all have failed organizations in helping them retain people of skill and choice. An even more difficult aspect is to identify the right people for development for leadership positions.

Needless to mention here organizations want talent up and down the hierarchy and when they fail to retain the same, they poach. If I am an organization that believes in having talent onboard and I recognize talent in some organization, I have every right to poach the same, provided I can compensate him/her in terms of growth, learning and opportunity!

Poaching is not unethical on the part of any organization. In fact it showcases a flaw in the organizations retention strategy from where the person is being poached. It basically means that there is fundamentally something wrong in the way the organization compensates its employees. This is one of the biggest challenges to talent management. Consider the following facts:

  • The average cost of hiring a new manager in place of another who has left the job is 1.5 to 3 times the salary!
  • Each managerial position vacant can cost an organization up to 60000 on an average. It may shoot to six figures in some management positions.
  • According to an estimate 1/3rd of business failures are due to poor hiring decision and inability to attract and retain quality people.

This is the cost of poaching to both the organizations, the one that is getting people onboard and the one that is losing people.

While poaching is not a new concept, what should be of more concern to HR is why do people leave and how to retain them. It’s none other than the talent management that has to come out with a solution.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Current State of Employer Branding

MSG Team

Current Trends in Talent Management

MSG Team