Challenges to Investment Banking Business
Investment banking has traditionally been a lucrative business. Investment bankers have always been in the news for the excessive amount of money that they made while the rest of the world was struggling. However, the relentless negative publicity that the industry has received in the past has changed the way it functions. Also, external circumstances […]
The Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) Movement
In the previous article, we learned about financial freedom or financial independence. However, in the traditional financial planning world, financial freedom was only considered to be a goal that is to be reached towards the end of one’s career. The general opinion was that financial freedom has to be reached when a person has attained […]
Can Cost Cutting Turn Out to be Expensive?
Downturns are part of an economic cycle. Every few years or so, the economy stops growing at a rapid speed. At first, the growth rate decelerates, then stagnates, and finally,, when negative growth appears, a recession officially kicks in. It is no mystery that generating revenues during recessions can be quite difficult. This is the […]
What is Cost Modelling?
In the previous article, we have discussed how important revenue modeling is and the techniques which are used by companies to ensure that their revenue models are accurate and up to date. Once the revenue modeling is complete, the next step in the process refers to the modeling of expenses. This process is challenging because […]
Types of Bankruptcy Frauds
In the previous article, we have learned about how corporations use bankruptcy as a strategic tool. However, it is important to emphasize the point that the application of those strategies is 100% legal. This is not the case with all bankruptcy-related strategies. Bankruptcy provides a corporation with substantial relief from the amount it owes. It […]
In the previous articles, we have already come across a couple of methods used for the valuation of a sports franchise. However, we know that both of those methods have certain shortcomings which make them unsuitable for the valuation of a sports franchise.
In this article, we will discuss a third approach called the market approach. The market approach is the most widely used approach when it comes to the valuation of sports franchises. The details of the market approach as well as the pros and cons of this approach have been discussed below:
The market approach towards the valuation of a sports franchise means that the value of the franchise will be derived based on arms-length, third-party sales, or transaction data regarding the various assets owned by the franchise. This means that the value of the franchise will be calculated as the sum of its parts.
Instead, of valuing the entire sporting franchise as one unit, the market approach advocates breaking down the assets and liabilities of the franchise into its component parts such as player contracts, brand value, stadium leases, etc.
The logic behind this approach is that the valuation of the franchise as a whole is quite difficult. However, it is possible and even convenient to accurately estimate the sum of the parts that create the franchise. Hence, the value of each part can be found out and it can later be summed up in order to derive the valuation of the franchise.
For example, the financial value of any team is largely influenced by the players who play for the team. Now, even though transactions regarding the sale and purchase of sporting franchises do not take place every day, it is common for players to be transferred across teams.
Hence, the market value of an individual player can be found by obtaining such data and then using mathematical analysis. It is common for the analysis to include the price of a rookie player and then make adjustments for experience, fan following, and brand value.
Similarly, it is possible to estimate the financial value that each and every player brings to the overall team by making adjustments on top of an already determined base value.
The fundamental premise is that it is easier to derive the market value of the component parts and then sum it up. Let’s have a look at some of the pros and cons of this approach.
The benefits of using the market approach for the valuation of a sporting franchise are as follows:
Also, it is not common for sporting franchises to be sold and bought regularly. However, when it comes to players or the contracts signed by franchises, there is an abundance of data available. It is possible to use this data as a marker for the overall valuation of the firm. This is the reason why the market-based valuation approach is the one that is followed by franchises around the world.
In the case of the market approach, both cash flows as well as the valuation of assets are considered. It can be viewed as a hybrid method that uses either a cash flow based or replacement cost-based approach to derive the market value of individual assets which are then combined.
However, when it comes to a market-based approach, the data from the sporting industry itself is used for valuation. Hence, this data can be considered to be more accurate and reflects the relative valuation based on the norms of the sporting industry.
The disadvantages of using the market-based approach are as follows:
We already know from portfolio theory that a simple mathematical sum cannot be used to determine the financial value of assets. Correlation as well as other factors also need to be taken into account which is not done in such cases.
The fact of the matter is that the market-based approach is the best mechanism when it comes to the valuation of a sports franchise.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
