Anchoring Bias in Behavioural Finance
The average investor may be able to keep their thinking in check and save themselves from a lot of biases. However, they still might not be aware of or be able to manage some of the more advanced biases. The anchoring bias is one such bias. It affects the thinking of even the most sophisticated […]
Single Stage FCFF Model
We now have a fair understanding of what the concepts of free cash flow to the firm is. We also know how to calculate this metric under various circumstances. It is now time to use this metric to arrive at the final valuation for a given firm which is the objective of the whole exercise. […]
The Role of the Finance Function in Organizational Processes
The Finance Function and the Project Office Contemporary organizations need to practice cost control if they are to survive the recessionary times. Given the fact that many top tier companies are currently mired in low growth and less activity situations, it is imperative that they control their costs as much as possible. This can happen […]
Why Healthy Corporate-Regulator Tussle is Good for Free Market Capitalist Economies
What the Resignation of Urjit Patel Means for the Corporate Regulator Tussle in India Recently, in India, the RBI or the Reserve Bank of India and its former governor, Urjit Patel, were in the news for their resistance to encroachment on their powers by the Government of India. Separately, the RBI and Patel were also […]
Regulatory Role Performed By the Central Bank
The two tiered system puts the central bank in control of the commercial banks. Therefore, the government authorities have delegated some of the regulatory responsibilities to the central bank. It is the job of the central bank to ensure that commercial banks are conducting their business in a manner which is considered ethical as well […]
In the previous articles, we have already come across a couple of methods used for the valuation of a sports franchise. However, we know that both of those methods have certain shortcomings which make them unsuitable for the valuation of a sports franchise.
In this article, we will discuss a third approach called the market approach. The market approach is the most widely used approach when it comes to the valuation of sports franchises. The details of the market approach as well as the pros and cons of this approach have been discussed below:
The market approach towards the valuation of a sports franchise means that the value of the franchise will be derived based on arms-length, third-party sales, or transaction data regarding the various assets owned by the franchise. This means that the value of the franchise will be calculated as the sum of its parts.
Instead, of valuing the entire sporting franchise as one unit, the market approach advocates breaking down the assets and liabilities of the franchise into its component parts such as player contracts, brand value, stadium leases, etc.
The logic behind this approach is that the valuation of the franchise as a whole is quite difficult. However, it is possible and even convenient to accurately estimate the sum of the parts that create the franchise. Hence, the value of each part can be found out and it can later be summed up in order to derive the valuation of the franchise.
For example, the financial value of any team is largely influenced by the players who play for the team. Now, even though transactions regarding the sale and purchase of sporting franchises do not take place every day, it is common for players to be transferred across teams.
Hence, the market value of an individual player can be found by obtaining such data and then using mathematical analysis. It is common for the analysis to include the price of a rookie player and then make adjustments for experience, fan following, and brand value.
Similarly, it is possible to estimate the financial value that each and every player brings to the overall team by making adjustments on top of an already determined base value.
The fundamental premise is that it is easier to derive the market value of the component parts and then sum it up. Let’s have a look at some of the pros and cons of this approach.
The benefits of using the market approach for the valuation of a sporting franchise are as follows:
Also, it is not common for sporting franchises to be sold and bought regularly. However, when it comes to players or the contracts signed by franchises, there is an abundance of data available. It is possible to use this data as a marker for the overall valuation of the firm. This is the reason why the market-based valuation approach is the one that is followed by franchises around the world.
In the case of the market approach, both cash flows as well as the valuation of assets are considered. It can be viewed as a hybrid method that uses either a cash flow based or replacement cost-based approach to derive the market value of individual assets which are then combined.
However, when it comes to a market-based approach, the data from the sporting industry itself is used for valuation. Hence, this data can be considered to be more accurate and reflects the relative valuation based on the norms of the sporting industry.
The disadvantages of using the market-based approach are as follows:
We already know from portfolio theory that a simple mathematical sum cannot be used to determine the financial value of assets. Correlation as well as other factors also need to be taken into account which is not done in such cases.
The fact of the matter is that the market-based approach is the best mechanism when it comes to the valuation of a sports franchise.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
