MSG Team's other articles

12252 Merger Modelling: The Accretion/Dilution Analysis

Merger modeling requires creating many sub-models which enable decision making. The accretion/dilution analysis is one such sub-model. It is one of the most sought after skills in junior investment bankers who have commonly entrusted the task of creating financial models in major investment banking firms. In this article, we will have a closer look at […]

11873 What is Inflation and How Does it Affect Professionals, Businesses, and Individuals

Inflation and What it Means for Consumers We all would have heard the term inflation and most of us would be fretting about how the rise in prices affects our ability to spend and our rapidly shrinking disposable incomes. Inflation is the percentage increase in prices measured over a specific time period. For instance, inflation […]

10577 Payment in Kind Bonds – Advantages, Disadvantages and its Types

In the past few articles, we have studied about different types of coupon payments. These coupon payments vary from each other a great deal. However, they all have one thing in common which is the fact that the interest is always paid in cash. However, payment in cash need not always be the case. There […]

11633 Triggers or Signs of Work-Life Imbalance

An imbalance between the personal life and work life can have serious or adverse effects on the health and well-being. This imbalance usually occurs when the boudaries between the professional life and personal life are not clearly demarcated and followed with a discipline. Work-life imbalance leads to emotional stress, depression and anxiety. Extensive studies and […]

10009 Importance of Interpersonal Relationship at Workplace

Interpersonal relationship refers to a strong association among individuals working together in the same organization. Employees working together ought to share a special bond for them to deliver their level best. It is essential for individuals to be honest with each other for a healthy interpersonal relationship and eventually positive ambience at the workplace. Why […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

How often we hear of business leaders and CEO’s who have just taken over proclaim that they would undertake radical change in the first 100 days?

How often do we also hear politicians and other personalities promising the moon within the first 100 days?

Of course, we don’t get to know how many of these changes have transpired in reality since by the time the first 100 days are over, we would have moved on to other matters.

The point here is that in this 24/7 culture of constant change, the temptation to set ambitious targets to achieve the goals within a short time is indeed something that even the most realistic of leaders cannot resist.

However, there is a certain limit to which such announcements and agendas for change can be actualized as real world problems, be it in business or governance, are hardly going to be solved within short periods.

The misconceptions surrounding the first 100 days achievements for change and realization of goals should be rightly called so as it is often difficult to actualize change within such a short period of time.

For instance, it takes time to build a team that would be in consonance with the CEO’s vision and mission. Often, building a team with those who are comfortable with the CEO and vice versa takes time.

Next, the on the job performance of any CEO cannot be measured within the first 100 days as the lingering issues from the past leaders or the previous CEO would continue to cast a shadow over the CEO’s performance. Though in politics, it is easy to blame the previous dispensation, it is not often the case that we hear CEO’s blaming the previous management since there is certain continuity in the business world in the transition process.

The other aspect or the myth is that CEO’s can get down to business the moment they take over. It takes months and even years of patient effort for the fruits to ripen and show results and hence, new CEO’s often have to prove their mettle. This means that they need to have an extended run in their position for them to actualize change.

The reason for the 100 days myth is that business leaders like politicians have a “honeymoon” period once they take over where their employees and constituents are willing to tolerate them during this time and hence, give them a breather before they become demanding.

Therefore, it is often tempting for the business leaders to set ambitious targets for the first 100 days. Without discounting the importance of this imperative, it needs to be mentioned that having unrealistic expectations from the new CEO would be self-defeating.

Finally, change is glacial and the profound slowness with which change is actualized means that there has to be a mutual communication between the CEO and the employees that is grounded in base expectations and is contextual in nature. Only then would the floors of the company not be littered with the broken glass from the ceilings of euphoria and hyperbole.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Curious Observation – First Step in Decision Making Process

MSG Team

Cyber Risk in Reinsurance

MSG Team

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team