MSG Team's other articles

11261 How the Sharing Economy is Different

Companies like Uber and Airbnb have a lot in common. They are both startups that were started with relatively fewer resources. Both these companies started around the same time. Uber started in 2008 whereas Airbnb started in 2009. Today, both these corporations are worth billions of dollars. However, the similarities do not end there. The […]

12219 Why are Companies Constantly Upgrading their ERP Systems?

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is the lifeblood of any business today. Any business, be it a medium scale enterprise or a multinational corporation relies extensively on the use of Enterprise Resource planning systems. This is the reason why these systems tend to be very expensive. There are mega-corporations like SAP and Oracle, which make billions […]

9353 Finished Goods Supply Chain Operations

FG Supply Chain consists of all activities involved in movement, storage and distribution of Finished Goods from the Delivery point of Plant to the Point of Sale. In the case of global supply chains, supply chain management gets more complicated with the variations arising out of different countries regulations and logistical practices. Computer Hardware supply […]

9450 What Caused the Global Economic Crisis ?

The previous article in the module introduced the global economic crisis with a brief overview of the causes. This article looks at the causes of the global economic crisis in depth. For starters, the global economic crisis carries a distinct “Made in the USA” tag which means that the origins of the crisis are to […]

12493 BPO and the Transformation of Process Work

In previous articles in this module, we have discussed how the BPO sector has evolved and some future directions for BPO companies in Asia. This article looks at a little known aspect of the BPO phenomenon i.e. the fact that the very nature of the process work has been transformed because of the emergence of […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

There has been considerable debate in the industry in the past as to whether Six Sigma projects are worth all the hoopla that has been surrounding it. For decades before this debate, Six Sigma was followed in a cult-like manner and organizations would never question the financial viability of the projects undertaken. However given the fact that many conmen type consultants have surfaced in the recent past promising unbelievable benefits from Six Sigma projects, checks are now imposed to ensure that the projects are financially viable. Here is a list of some prominent issues in Six Sigma financial evaluation as well as how these issues have been solved.

Contemporary Issues in Financial Evaluation

Projected Numbers Never Materialize: At the end of the Six Sigma project, the Finance Certifier gives the PNV of the project. This is the Projected Net Value of the project and markedly different from the Net Present Value (NPV). The difference stems from the fact that all the calculations mentioned are hypothetical in nature. This means that it is assumed that the process will continue behaving in a certain way and financial benefits will be realised over a period of time. However an analysis of the past projects has shown that the reality was very different. In many cases, the projected numbers were not realised.

Calculations are Off-base: A deeper evaluation of past Six Sigma projects shows that the reason gains were never realised was the fact there were no gains in the first place! The numbers used to show the financial viability of the project were off base. Many times it was assumed that market shares would increase because of efficient processes, however it did not materialise because competitors improved their processes too. It was clear that the consultants were accounting for gains that were beyond the control of the organization.

Bonuses are Paid on Projections: What intensified the debate further was the fact that bonuses were paid to executives on the basis of these fudged numbers. Executives therefore had an interest to inflate the financial viability of the project and show it off as a bigger success than it actually was misleading the strategic initiative of the organization involved.

Solutions to Contemporary Issues

As a result of this debate, many organizations have become vigilant on what they spend towards Six Sigma initiatives and what is the Return On Investment (ROI). Here are some of the initiatives that have been started:

Follow Up Review: A project is not considered an immediate success on completion. Reviews are set up every six months or so where the senior member of the project team meet with the senior management to check whether the project is on track and delivering what was promised to the organization, if not, why? And what can be done to ensure that the gains are in fact realised?

Standardized Calculation Policy: Many corporations have come up with explicit policies regarding how calculations pertaining to Six Sigma projects can be done. This has eliminated the problem of fudged numbers to a large extent.

Personal Accountability: A large part of the bonus of the executives is linked to the realization of gains. Bonus is announced at one go, but paid over a period of time if reviews show the project is one track.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Conducting the Knowledge Transfer

MSG Team

Closing a Six Sigma Project

MSG Team

Step 3B: Choosing the Correct Control Chart (Continuous Data)

MSG Team