MSG Team's other articles

10615 Perils and Consequences of Information Overload and Drowning in a Sea of Information

What is Information Overload ? We are drowning in a sea of information. We are inundated with news, views, opinions, facts, and information every time we log in to the internet or turn on the TV. This constant barrage of information thrown at us nonstop in a 24/7 cycle makes us weary and lost in […]

8843 History of Database Applications

One of the most important purposes of development of computer systems was the database application which could have been used on them. Data processing drove growth of computer processor speed. In fact, data processing predates the computers; punched cards were used in the US for collecting data for census during beginning of 20th century. Earliest […]

10039 Is a Pollution Tax Worth it ?

Washington DC has seen several proposals for strange regulations. The latest one of these suggestions is a pollution tax. Many people believe that levying a tax may be the solution to eradicating the problem of climate change gradually. The world in general and Washington DC, in particular, wants to get rid of high levels of […]

12221 It’s Now or Never: Why Business Must Embrace Sustainability before it is Too Late

How Climate Change and Ecological Damage is Hurting Our Planet Everywhere we look around us, we see the impacts of our unsustainable lifestyles. Whether it is the Australian Bushfires, the Amazon forest burning, or the unseasonal storms and hurricanes, the effects of climate change and eco unfriendly business and lifestyle practices are taking a toll […]

10794 How the Promised Utopia of Technology is Turning into a Perilous Dystopian Nightmare

What it was like during the Early Days of the Internet Boom when Utopia seemed Possible There is a general consensus among economists and management experts that technology leads to increased productivity, elimination of redundant barriers between the parties in a commercial exchange, enhances innovation and invention, and above all, contributes to the betterment of […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

There has been considerable debate in the industry in the past as to whether Six Sigma projects are worth all the hoopla that has been surrounding it. For decades before this debate, Six Sigma was followed in a cult-like manner and organizations would never question the financial viability of the projects undertaken. However given the fact that many conmen type consultants have surfaced in the recent past promising unbelievable benefits from Six Sigma projects, checks are now imposed to ensure that the projects are financially viable. Here is a list of some prominent issues in Six Sigma financial evaluation as well as how these issues have been solved.

Contemporary Issues in Financial Evaluation

Projected Numbers Never Materialize: At the end of the Six Sigma project, the Finance Certifier gives the PNV of the project. This is the Projected Net Value of the project and markedly different from the Net Present Value (NPV). The difference stems from the fact that all the calculations mentioned are hypothetical in nature. This means that it is assumed that the process will continue behaving in a certain way and financial benefits will be realised over a period of time. However an analysis of the past projects has shown that the reality was very different. In many cases, the projected numbers were not realised.

Calculations are Off-base: A deeper evaluation of past Six Sigma projects shows that the reason gains were never realised was the fact there were no gains in the first place! The numbers used to show the financial viability of the project were off base. Many times it was assumed that market shares would increase because of efficient processes, however it did not materialise because competitors improved their processes too. It was clear that the consultants were accounting for gains that were beyond the control of the organization.

Bonuses are Paid on Projections: What intensified the debate further was the fact that bonuses were paid to executives on the basis of these fudged numbers. Executives therefore had an interest to inflate the financial viability of the project and show it off as a bigger success than it actually was misleading the strategic initiative of the organization involved.

Solutions to Contemporary Issues

As a result of this debate, many organizations have become vigilant on what they spend towards Six Sigma initiatives and what is the Return On Investment (ROI). Here are some of the initiatives that have been started:

Follow Up Review: A project is not considered an immediate success on completion. Reviews are set up every six months or so where the senior member of the project team meet with the senior management to check whether the project is on track and delivering what was promised to the organization, if not, why? And what can be done to ensure that the gains are in fact realised?

Standardized Calculation Policy: Many corporations have come up with explicit policies regarding how calculations pertaining to Six Sigma projects can be done. This has eliminated the problem of fudged numbers to a large extent.

Personal Accountability: A large part of the bonus of the executives is linked to the realization of gains. Bonus is announced at one go, but paid over a period of time if reviews show the project is one track.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Conducting the Knowledge Transfer

MSG Team

Closing a Six Sigma Project

MSG Team

Step 3B: Choosing the Correct Control Chart (Continuous Data)

MSG Team