MSG Team's other articles

8850 The Debate over the Continuity of Policies When Governments Change and Implications

Is it Necessary to Discontinue Policies of the Predecessors when Governments Change? You might have read in the news about the decision of the Current Government in Andhra Pradesh, a state in India, to cancel the grandiose plans for the capital of the state chosen by the previous government and instead, go in for decentralised […]

9491 The Great Deleveraging and the Reason why the Global Economic Recovery would Falter

The Effect of Two Decades of Profligate Spending Everyone expects the global economy to recover in a magical way and for the good times to return. We are constantly fed on a steady barrage of feel good messages from the marketers about the goods and services they make and sell with the intention of making […]

11267 Should Corporates Implement Affirmative Action as a Means of Ensuring Social Justice?

What is Affirmative Action and does it Help or Hinder the Goals of Social Justice? The United States has a policy of what is known as Affirmative Action on campuses across the country to actualize Social Justice and to empower historically disadvantaged and disaffected communities. Affirmative Action is a term which indicates how members of […]

10773 Productivity and Its Role in Shaping Economies and Businesses

Introduction: Productivity and Its Centrality to Growth We often hear the term productivity in many contexts and whether you are a student or a working professional, you are constantly exhorted to be more productive. In recent years, the dictum that do not work hard, but Work Smart, is often used by many of the opinion […]

12033 Why We Should Not Let the Present Global Crisis Go Waste and Make Positive Changes

Never Let a Serious Crisis Go Waste The Chinese term for crisis is a combination of danger and opportunity, which means that a crisis is a good time for opportunity as well. In other words, whenever we are confronted by a crisis whether it is personal or collective, we have the chance to make serious […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The 5 why method or the Root Cause analysis method that has been described in the Tools section plays an important role in determining that the X’s are recorded at actionable level. In this implementation of the 5 why tool, there is a slight variation from the standard methodology and hence it has been explained in the context of Actionable X’s below:

5 Why Method

The 5 why method is a non-statistical method to convert vital few inputs to their actionable level. It does not require any elaborate mathematical testing but rather simply relies on brainstorming the reasons and digging deeper and deeper in the process.

Procedure

  1. Common Understanding of X’s And Y’s: The first step in the procedure itself differentiated the 5 whys analysis in the case of finding actionable X’s to the five why’s analysis in other cases. Here, the 5 why analysis is usually performed by the entire Six Sigma team rather than a bunch of experts. Hence, it is essential to ensure that everyone has the correct understanding of the vital few inputs and outputs being discussed and that the goal is to reach an actionable level. The facilitator must ensure to reach an explicit agreement on the definition of X and Y as well as eliminate common misunderstandings as soon as the process begins.

  2. Brainstorm: The second step is to brainstorm as many possible reasons to figure out what the next step could be. Every member in the team must be encouraged to come up with a unique explanation.

  3. Analyse the Responses: Since there are likely to be more than one responses to the 5 why’s question, choice needs to be made. At every stage the choice has the capability of completely changing the focus of the analysis. Hence, common grounds must be reached between the team. A common practise is to select a reason that has least assumptions attached to it.

  4. Iterate: Once the agreement has been reached. It is now time to check whether the X is still at the actionable level. If Yes, the exercise should be stopped, if not the exercise must be iterated till the actionable level is indeed reached.

The 5 in the 5 why’s is a mere abstraction. The actual number of iterations required to come up with an actionable X will be less or more. However in almost all cases, actionable levels are reached within 5 iterations.

The 5 whys analysis for finding actionable X’s is therefore a combination of the regular root cause analysis and brainstorming. Instead of relying on expert knowledge, the collective knowledge of the Six Sigma project team is used here.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

What is Correlation Analysis and How is it Performed ?

MSG Team

Developing the Predictive Equation

MSG Team

What is Hypothesis Testing ?

MSG Team