Common Issues with Revenue Generated from Broadcasting Right
February 12, 2025
Debt securities are widely issued and traded in the secondary market. Debt securities could have a fixed interest rate or a floating interest rate. When debt is taken for the short term, fixed interest rates are preferred. However, in the medium to long run, the interest rates cannot be directly fixed. This is because, as […]
Portfolio management refers to the art of managing various financial products and assets to help an individual earn maximum revenues with minimum risks involved in the long run. Portfolio management helps an individual to decide where and how to invest his hard earned money for guaranteed returns in the future. Portfolio Management Models Capital Asset […]
In the previous article, we have studied about how vendor financing is being used as an alternate mechanism of finance in the infrastructure financing community. Similarly, leasing is also being used as a method of raising finances for infrastructure projects. Leasing is primarily used because this method allows conserving capital as well as provides many […]
There are many sports management companies across the world that can be classified as large corporations. Many of these corporations or franchises have assets worth several millions of dollars. Hence, an average person will assume that the sources of financing for sports franchises are also similar to that of other corporations. However, this is not […]
Sports franchises are also business entities just like other private companies. Hence, it is possible for the owners of these companies to want to sell their stake just like other companies do. If the owner does want to sell off their stake, they need to know its valuation. Also, the valuation of different clubs can […]
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises.
We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who end up subsidizing a particular team.
There are many people who do not clearly understand the economic rationale behind not building stadiums. However, they are well aware of the fact that a lot of professional sports franchises are owned by billionaires and if there was any possibility of obtaining a profit by running these facilities, then the franchise owners have enough resources to do so themselves.
The fact that some of these billionaires are insisting that public resources should be used to build the stadium can be considered evidence that the stadium is not a viable financial project.
However, in order to make the economic logic clearer, we need to spell out the exact logical fallacies in the muddled reasoning and obfuscation provided to the general public. The common arguments given in favor of government funding of such projects have been debunked below.
The bottom-level workers who work in the offices as well as at the stadiums are not paid much. Hence, the end result is that most of the money which is accumulated from fans of the team who are present in the city is sent to the bank accounts of these top personnel.
It is likely that most of the players as well as the management do not stay in the cities in which they play. It is also possible that they do not spend most of the money they receive as remuneration in the local economy. Hence, if a government builds a stadium, it is actually assisting the team in transferring their economic resources to other cities.
In the absence of such a stadium, the money would probably have been spent locally and would have helped local businesses. Hence, it can be said that not only does funding a stadium not help in creating economic wealth for the host city, but it can actually lead to the destruction of such economic wealth.
The additional money that they have not spent keeps on piling up on the balance sheet of these sporting franchises. This increases the notional value of these franchises which many billionaire owners are able to realize once they put the franchise up for sale.
Tourists who watch such matches generally do not visit the city primarily for sports events. Instead, most of the tourists are already in town for business purposes or to visit their family and end up visiting the stadium. Hence, it would not be appropriate to say that any additional revenue is generated on account of the presence of the stadium.
It has to be taken in relation to the other projects. As a result, there is almost no rationale for investing public money in stadiums. Public money needs to be invested either to obtain maximum returns or for social service.
If the money is being used to build stadiums, then the end result is that sub-optimal returns are being generated. Also, the government is not doing any public service by undertaking these projects. Instead, they are helping the rich become richer.
On the other hand, branding and image benefits are intangible and hence cannot be used to quantify the outcomes. The proponents of government funding in sporting facilities end up using this vagueness to their advantage.
The bottom line is that if billionaire owners as well as star players have to hold the local municipality at ransom and threaten to relocate to another city, then the project certainly isn’t a good investment.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *