Comparative Public Administration
February 12, 2025
The very word bureaucracy conjures images of sloth, inefficiency and status quoist mindset. To associate bureaucracy with change would thus be looked as an oxymoron. However, it is the case that some large organizations that were otherwise bureaucratic in their organizational structures managed to bring about change in the way they worked. The best known […]
Trust seems to be the key trait linked with leadership. A leader cannot lead if his followers do not trust him. A leader discovers the employees’/followers problems and tries to solve them, but it is the trust that his followers hold on him which tells whether the leaders retrieve the knowledge and intellectuality required to […]
What Differentiates Truly Great Leaders from Run of the Mill Leaders? There are leaders who run organizations and nations to secure their position and to make the most of the opportunity to lead them. Also, there are leaders who are visionary but yet lack the capacity or the needed mission capabilities to focus on organizational […]
What are Root Cause Analyses and How They Both Help and Hinder Organizations As the name implies, Root Cause Analysis, or the process of determining the causes and the reasons behind an event or occurrence in organizations, helps them understand why it happened and how it can be prevented from happening in the future, as […]
Risk and control self-assessment (RCSA) is an internal procedure used to identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks within a company.1 In this article, we will discuss the purpose and benefits of this process, before exploring the key stages involved in conducting a thorough RCSA. What is the Purpose of an RCSA? Regular engagement in RCSAs […]
The pioneering scholar of the theory of decision making in organizations, was Herbert Simon. He was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and was one of the most celebrated political scientist, economist, sociologist and also a psychologist.
His body of work covers topics from administration to cognitive psychology to artificial intelligence. He was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his most important work, the decision making process of the organizations. Therefore, for the sake of our discussion we shall refer to the theories and concepts provided by Simon for the administrative decision making.
In his book Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, he makes a very remarkable statement that decision making is the heart of administration. He went on to add further that the logic and psychology of human choice determine the administrative theory.
The entire premise of Simon’s work is based on the logical rational model as mentioned earlier, but it is important to understand rationality within this particular context of decision making.
In Simon’s work, rationality becomes a variable and he was aware of the limitations of human rationality as well which are not static but depend on the environment of the organization in which the decisions take place.
According to Simon, the task of the administration should be to design such an environment in which the individual approach becomes as rational as practicably be possible.
To understand the concept, we need to understand three important aspects:
The Economic Man is all about the ideal and rational model of decision making. In an organization the decisions are made on empirical and normative elements, these premises can also be called the factual or the value premises.
The factual premise is nothing but all the information and knowledge regarding the organization and its environment.
The value premises on the other hand are the morals and legal constraints.
A rational decision is to choose those alternatives which are appropriate to reach the desired end. The means and ends have to be connected in the organizational hierarchy.
The Administrative Man depicts the objective rationality, determining whether the selected alternative’s course of action is good enough. The administrative man’s approach to the world is simplistic and would take into account only a few most relevant and critical factors unlike the economic man for whom knowing all the alternatives and its consequences is a complex task.
Lastly, the Organization Perspective criticizes the earlier established principles of administration which were:
Simon argues that the applicability of administrative principles needs to be based on an underlying understanding of the administrative decision making. Organization manifests its influence through five mechanisms as identified by Simon. These are:
Therefore, the decision making within an organization is a complex process which is influenced by several factors. It is advisable to the readers to study more about Herbert Simon and his work on decision making to be able to appreciate the vastness and complexity of the decision making process in administrative organizations and economy.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *