Need for a Gender Equality Strategy to Actualize women’s Empowerment
The Glass Ceiling and the Persistent Problem of Gender Discrimination More often than not, corporates pay lip service to gender equality wherein they have a gender policy in place without much changing on the ground. Indeed, most corporates worldwide are mandated by the law to have a clear policy that deters sexual harassment at the […]
Management of Nonprofit Organizations
Management of Nonprofits By definition, the nonprofit sector operates in the humanitarian goals and objectives space. This means that many nonprofits are loosely structured and are often volunteer driven without formal hierarchies and patterns of management. However, this does not mean that nonprofits need not have formal boards, management structures, and financial control. The point […]
Lessons for Business Leaders from the Downfall of Charles Ghosn of Renault – Nissan
The Downfall of Charles Ghosn and his Sudden Fall from Grace Over the last few days, the global media has incessantly covered the fall from grace of one of the most flamboyant and charismatic CEOs (Chief Executive Officers) of the present times, Charles Ghosn of Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi, the three way automakers alliance which is one of […]
Public and Private Administration
The expansion of public sector into industrial enterprises has been into practice for quite some time, a little over half a century now. The public sector organizations in order to function efficiently are borrowing heavily from the business knowledge, administration and process orientation of the private organizations. However, there still remains a considerable difference between […]
Backtesting Value at Risk (VaR)
Merely creating a model which calculates the value at risk (VaR) i.e. the greatest possible loss that a company can face in a particular time period is not enough. In order for risk management to be effective, the results provided by the model should actually correlate with reality. Otherwise, the model will make predictions that […]
Academicians and practitioners from all over the world have been tried very hard to come up with a model which would help them to predict bankruptcy in a firm before it occurred.
In the previous article, we have already studied how the expected default frequency model was used and what its advantages and limitations were. However, it is not the only model which is used by firms to gauge how far other firms are from bankruptcy.
The Altman’s Z score model has been used extensively over the years. In this article, we will have a closer look at how the Z score model came into existence and how it can help predict bankruptcy over the long run.
The Altman’s Z score model was developed by an American professor and researcher at the Stern University in 1968. However, it would be unfair to say that Altman’s Z score model was indigenously built by Professor Altman. Instead, it was a result of improvements over many such previous models which were developed earlier.
The idea of predicting bankruptcy shot to prominence during the 1930s. This is because of the Great Depression when hundreds of companies went bankrupt and many times endangered the financial viability of the banks and investors that lent money to them.
Over the years, many statisticians developed models to try and predict bankruptcy using financial ratios of bankrupt companies as data points. However, most of them failed. Professor Altman was able to finally devise a model which gave accurate results. Hence, the model was named after him.
The beauty of Professor Altman’s model is that it is very simple. Earlier, Dr. Altman had decided that the Z score formula should use 22 ratios. However, over time, he realized that the results were almost the same even if 5 ratios were used instead of 22. Hence, the final Altman’s Z score is a score that is derived using a weighted average of 5 ratios.
The coefficients which are assigned to the different ratios in this formula have been derived by running rigorous statistical procedures on the data derived from bankrupt firms. Data was derived from firms that went bankrupt and which didn’t go bankrupt. The data was analyzed over different periods of time. This helped isolate the five key ratios and their coefficients which now form a part of Altman’s Z score model.
The Altman’s Z score is known for being extremely accurate. During the earlier years, when this score was launched, it had an accuracy of 72% in predicting default before it actually occurred. However, over the years, the accuracy rate has increased and now the score has a 90% accuracy rate when it comes to predicting bankruptcy.
The Z score is a score that is calculated based on the formula provided by Professor Altman. After the scores are calculated, companies are categorized into one of the three grades.
The safe, grey, and distress zones are defined based on the industry. Hence, sharing their absolute values here is not meaningful.
Altman’s model has some limitations. However, since this model is quite old, steps have been taken to mitigate these limitations as well.
Today, most of the top companies in the world are asset-light. Hence, to make sure that the model adapts to this changing reality, another version of the model called Altman’s Z’’ (Z double dash) model was developed.
The bottom line is that the Altman’s Z score is a valuable model which can be used to find out the creditworthiness of another firm. It has been used for decades to manage exposure and reduce the probability of credit loss. However, it cannot be used alone. It needs to be used in conjunction with other models in order to ensure that the right decision has been taken.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
