Executive Pay: The Curious Case of Carlos Ghosn’s Arrest
February 12, 2025
Global capital is always on the search of the next profitable opportunity and this is the reason why the BRICs or the grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, and China found favor as emerging markets in the last two decades. As these economies began to sag and saturate, the restless investors began looking for the next […]
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is often seen criticizing American President Donald Trump for his protectionist trade policies. Trudeau has openly criticized the Americans and Trump in particular for breaking up the NAFTA and for pulling out of the Paris Accord. Trudeau also wants to project Canada’s image as a country wherein immigrants are welcome. […]
How Sports Became Big Business Nowadays, sports mean big bucks for all stakeholders. Whether they are sportspersons, corporates, advertisers, or the sports bodies tasked with administering the game, all of them stand to gain from the infusion of Million Dollar deals that have become the norm rather than the exception. Indeed, the move to make […]
When we discuss globalization, we often take into account the fact that both countries that are partners in trade benefit from the exchange. What this means is that a country A that specializes in a particular good or service can trade with country B that specializes in another good or service. In this way, both […]
The purpose of measurement system is to validate the measurements before they are considered as factual data and used as a basis for decision making. Any experienced Six Sigma executive knows the reality that the measurement system is nowhere nearly as good as you think it is. People who conduct the measurement system analysis for […]
There has been a conspiracy theory amongst Apple iPhone users that Apple slows down the performance of the older phones. The critics of this policy believe that Apple does this to force the users to get rid of their old phones with performance problems.
The move is aimed at forcing users to upgrade to newer models and keep the cash flow coming.
In December 2017, Apple admitted that it has indeed slowed down the performance of some of the older version of these iPhones. As a result, all hell broke loose. Consumer advocacy groups immediately started accusing Apple of following unfair business practices. Many of these groups have filed class-action lawsuits against Apple Inc.
In this article, we will understand the debate around Apple’s actions.
Apple claims that if the older phones make a big power demand from the battery, the battery sends current spikes to the processor. The processor has been designed to protect itself from such current spikes. The reaction of the processor is to shut down the phone to protect the processor and prolong its life. It is for this reason that sudden shutdowns are common amongst iPhones phones that are older.
Apple claims that the software upgrade was aimed at making the processor slower. This would mean that the processor would no longer be able to make a big power demand from the battery and the whole process can be avoided.
Apple, therefore, claims that its actions were aligned with its values which put the customer’s interest before anything else. Apple has rejected the claims that it purposely slows down the phones to cajole the users into buying newer products.
The critics of Apple have called this more of an ethical issue than a business issue. Let’s assume that Apple is indeed right about slowing down the phones. Maybe it does protect the processor of the phones and prolong its life.
However, does Apple have the right to unilaterally slow down the performance of the firm? Did they ask the users of iPhone whether they would want their phones slowed down?
Apple should have ideally sent a message to users giving them the option to continue with the existing software or upgrade to a newer one if they wish to.
Once users buy the product, Apple does not have any right to meddle with its software without the user’s consent. Hence, even if Apple has slowed down the iPhone with the right intentions, it is still invading the privacy of consumers.
Apple is modifying consumers’ devices without their consent! This would be like selling a house to somebody and then later digging up the front yard! Even if the idea was to protect the homeowner from a flood, one first needs to seek permission before digging the front yard.
This is not the first time that Apple has been entangled in legal issues. Earlier the company was facing a lawsuit because it refused to sell replacement batteries for their phones. iPhones are perfectly usable after a couple of years. It is only the lithium-ion batteries that have a limited shelf life.
Hence, ideally, Apple should provide its users with the options of replacing the batteries and continue with their older phones whose performance should remain unhampered. Instead, Apple chooses not to provide the batteries.
This is not only unethical from an economic standpoint but also negatively impacts the environment. When consumers dump their old phones and buy new ones, they start generating large amounts of electronic waste.
Even the current problem would be completely solved if users could replace their batteries. Slowing down the iPhone is not the only solution that Apple has. It is the most profitable one that Apple choose even though it is against consumer interests.
Apple Inc. is likely to face setbacks thanks to this controversy. Some of them have been listed below.
If they do not view the company in a positive light, there would be no reason for them to pay significant premiums and buy the phone. This confession by Apple has rattled the confidence of even their staunchest supporters. Apple needs to get a public relations team in place to manage this controversy and limit its impact.
When users buy expensive stuff, they want it to be durable. If the phones have to be replaced every couple of years, why not buy a cheaper one!
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *