The Process of Competency Based Assessment
February 12, 2025
Career development programs are most effective when they are integrated with the organization’s ongoing training and development strategies. For being able to do this, an organization must have a carefully designed career development system especially designed to meet its own unique needs and requirements. An automated and well-designed career management system not only benefits organizations […]
Introduction We often hear the term employee engagement being spoken about in various contexts. We are often told by management experts that engaged employees are a source of sustainable competitive advantage. During earlier periods of organizational theory and practice, it was common for the HR (Human Resources) function to take care of administrative aspects such […]
In recent years, the number of students with work experience has gone up in the business schools around the world. while the business schools in the US and Europe have always had work experience as a prerequisite for enrollment, Asian business schools have tended to take in more students fresh out of graduate courses. while […]
What is a Value Driven HRM Approach and how can it be actualized in Practice? Values are everything when dealing with people. Without humane and compassionate approaches when dealing with employees, suppliers, fellow executives, and other societal and governmental stakeholders, people to people relationships become fraught with friction and introduce an element of tension. With […]
Organizations are increasingly facing the heat of attrition, which is not good to health of the same. Money and resources are spent into training an individual for a particular job and when he/she leaves the return on that investment equals null. Often it is not for the money that people leave; that may be the […]
Feedback after any form of assessment or evaluation helps in mirroring the information regarding their performance to the candidate and also initiates the learning process in them.
An objective, transparent and respectful conversation needs to be conducted during feedback to drive home the points which the participant needs to work upon.
Giving feedback is never easy not even for an external consultant conducting an assessment in the organization and when assessments are done internally it becomes all the more important that the feedback process is handled delicately.
It sure does not mean that the points which address the negative aspects of a candidate’s personality are left un-discussed; neither has it to be sweet talked or disguised.
There are certain considerations which can guide an assessor during feedback:
The feedback provider has to remember that feedback is also a mechanism to learn for people. We might as well make a reference to the Johari Window, here:
The feedback should aim that the participant gets aware of both the areas of strength and areas of development. It should encourage introspection, help participants draw inference and reach conclusions.
People are very good at hiding any feeling of hurt and upset. However, beneath the fa ade lies a demoralized and de-motivated individual.
For example, some participants might start thinking “if that is what I am like, am I really going to get where I want” or “Is this they think of me” such situation require very careful handling of feedback else it can become the road to frustration.
If the desired level of trust does not exist between the assessor and the participant, the facilitation of the feedback discussion becomes very difficult and the purpose is defeated.
If assessors share the outcomes and feedback with the participant without allowing discussion or comment, the feedback session becomes a fiasco.
Where participants do not share hopes, aspirations or intrinsically commit to their development actions no further progress can take place.
Some participants may also blatantly refuse to accept the observation and information provided by assessors and could externalize reasons to validate their behaviors, even questioning the entire assessment process.
For example, “these exercises are not relevant to my work situation” or “I work in the XYZ industry and this is not the case there” or “this is just an exercise we did, actual work is very different”.
This is an attempt at blocking discussion around their performance being examined.
Participant age and demographic profile also strongly impact their perception and expectations from assessors.
Older, more experienced and senior participants feel vulnerable being observed by juniors or internal colleagues.
Hence, a lot of planning is required before the feedback session. It helps if the assessor can know the profile of the participant before-hand as it later helps in navigating the feedback discussion appropriately.
And in the end it is important to remember the very basic principle of androgogy that adults learn if they find the learning relevant to what they do.
It is important to link feedback to the everyday work of the participant and how improving can have positive effects on their work also can be outlined.
This helps in greater acceptability of feedback.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *