MSG Team's other articles

11799 The Big Bust – Washington Mutual (WaMu)

Washington Mutual (WaMu) was one of the oldest and biggest banks in the United States. Like many of its peers, this bank had survived several financial shocks such as World Wars, Great Depression etc. Also, like many of its peers it became a big ticket casualty of the subprime mortgage crash. Washington Mutual (WaMu)’s fall […]

12213 What are Monopolies and How They Help and Harm the Economy and Their Regulation

How Economies Work Best When Free Market Forces are Truly Free and Fair According to Economic Theories, Free Market Economies work best when they are left to themselves and be guided by the Hidden Hand of Markets. In other words, what this means is that any capitalist economy works towards optimal outcomes as long as […]

11926 Economics of Human Resources: Why a Minimum Wage is Needed for Employees

What is a Minimum Wage and Why is it so Contentious? Many of us would be familiar with the term Minimum Wage which is often argued as being necessary by labor union activists and worker federations. However, how many of us would know that this concept of a Minimum Wage is highly contentious not only […]

12968 The Creator Economy Is a Passport to Riches for a Few, a Pipe Dream for the Rest

Why Wannabe Influencers and Creators Need a Reality Check on Social Media The rise of the Creator Economy in recent years has made some social media influencers very rich. Attracted by their successes, Millions of so-called Creators, who create everything from YouTube/TikTok videos, to Instagram reels, and LinkedIn articles, not to leave out Facebook and […]

9668 How Savings Affect the Economy?

Economics is divided on the role of savings. Many economists believe that saving is a personal virtue but social vice. This is because if all the people start saving, the expenditure will go down. Since the current system measures GDP and economic growth based on expenditure, a higher savings rate makes it appear like the […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The role that the government played in causing the subprime mortgage crisis is highly debatable. However, the same cannot be said regarding the role performed by the so called government sponsored entities.

The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) are three such entities. The newspapers, media and even the general population were of the opinion that these corporations have caused mayhem in the mortgage markets. In the aftermath of the subprime mortgage crisis, these agencies required the highest bailout financed by taxpayers dollars.

These agencies were created many years before the crisis. The reason behind their foundation was to make home ownership more affordable in the United States. These agencies were formed to create a secondary mortgage market meant to provide liquidity to the originators of residential mortgages. These agencies were empowered as and when the political motives behind Community Reinvestment Act became strong. In this article and the next we will study in detail, the workings and shortcomings of these agencies.

Government Sponsored Entities

Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae were all government sponsored entities. The average person may not even know the meaning of these words. A government sponsored entity is a weird combination between a government entity and a corporate entity. Hence it is often known as a quasi-government entity.

This means that these agencies were created because a special legislation was passed by the US Congress for each of their creation. Therefore, they got a charter from the government. However, they are also publicly listed corporations which trade on the market! Hence, they are both public and private at the same time which confuses a lot of people.

Government Control

Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae are also subject to a lot of control from the government. At least this was supposed to be theoretically the case. Some of the restrictions levied are as follows:

  • The government has the authority to appoint five of the 18 board members in these coporations. Hence, theoretically, the management of these firms is controlled by the governments.

  • Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae are not allowed to participate in the primary mortgage markets. This means that they cannot directly make any loans to the borrowers. They have to form the secondary mortgage markets leaving the task of loan origination to commercial and trust banks.

  • Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae are also subject to limits which govern the maximum size of the mortgages that they buy. This size is linked to the housing price index. This is done to ensure that these quasi government agencies are actually buying the mortgages that help the lower and middle income groups rather than financing the wealthy households.

  • These agencies are also subject to regulations which govern the quality of mortgages that they can purchase from the open market. The rules stated that Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae can only buy a mortgage if the borrower has put in at least 20% of the margin money or the mortgage is guaranteed by an external credit enhancement like insurance. However, later these rules were circumvented by these agencies.

  • Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae are also subject to regulatory checks just like commercial and trust banks. These audits are conducted at periodic intervals.

It is for this reason that the bonds sold by these quasi government agencies were not listed either under government or private bonds. Rather, a special new section called “government sponsored agencies” was created to list them.

Monopoly

Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae were started in the 1970’s. They really started to pick some traction by the 1990’s. These agencies had a first mover advantage in the secondary mortgage markets section. This coupled with the fact that they had major advantages by being a quasi government entity created a virtual monopoly of these agencies.

Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae have held more than 90% of the secondary mortgage market for decades ever since their inception. It was only in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s that Wall Street investment banks also wanted a piece of the secondary mortgage pie.

This is when they took advantage of the limitations present in the charter of Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae. They started buying mortgages which were greater in value than those which these agencies were allowed to buy. They also started buying mortgages which were more riskier i.e. did not meet the minimum down payment criteria or did not have an external credit enhancement.

Once the Wall Street took to buying such riskier loans, they started getting more and more share of the security mortgage markets. Seeing their market share erode Freddie Mac, Fannie Man and Ginnie Mae also started buying riskier mortgages by finding ways to circumvent the laws.

These riskier mortgages were what later caused the subprime mortgage crisis. Since both Wall Street banks as well as government agencies were aggressively buying and selling these mortgages, both of them found themselves close to bankruptcy when the market went bust and both of them were later bailed out with taxpayer dollars. The story of how that unfolded will be covered in later modules.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Credit Market Freeze – Causes and its Importance

MSG Team

Collateralized Debt Obligations and Tranching

MSG Team

The Big Fall: Bear Stearns

MSG Team