MSG Team's other articles

11388 Stockholder Management vs. Stakeholder Management

The Dominant View: The Business of Business is Profits Ever since the modern corporation took shape in the form that it is now, there has been an overriding consensus that the corporation exists to serve its shareholders or stockholders. The late legendary economist of the Chicago School, Milton Friedman remarked that the “responsibility of business […]

11190 Sales Operation

Sales Operation refers to various activities which help in the timely achievement of sales targets for the successful functioning of an organization. Sales Operation includes various strategies and techniques employed by an individual to achieve sales goals within the stipulated time frame. Why Sales Operation? Sales Operation activities help the sales professionals to meet the […]

13025 Customer Loyalty Breakers

When customers end up his relationship with suppliers, he breaks the loyalty with him. Following are the reasons which are responsible for loyalty break ups: Customer dis-satisfaction: Customer dissatisfaction is the primary reason that results in breaking up the continued loyalty with the supplier. Most of the unsatisfied customers try to find more prominent alternatives […]

11426 Own the Future: Insights from Recent Research into Strategizing for the Future

This article discusses the ten qualities needed for companies to stay ahead of the competition and win the race for the market in the next decade. With so much of rapid change and accelerating trends, it is important for companies to be, the biggest and the best or else they run the risk of getting […]

12996 CSR and Corporate Governance: Two Sides of the Same Coin

In previous articles, we discussed how effective corporate governance is essential for a well functioning economy and how the practice of good corporate governance is the lubricant that greases the machine of the corporate world. We had also discussed how the practice of corporate social responsibility or CSR is a step in the direction of […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Core Competency Theory

The core competency theory is the theory of strategy that prescribes actions to be taken by firms to achieve competitive advantage in the marketplace. The concept of core competency states that firms must play to their strengths or those areas or functions in which they have competencies.

In addition, the theory also defines what forms a core competency and this is to do with it being not easy for competitors to imitate, it can be reused across the markets that the firm caters to and the products it makes, and it must add value to the end user or the consumers who get benefit from it.

In other words, companies must orient their strategies to tap into the core competencies and the core competency is the fundamental basis for the value added by the firm.

Core Competencies and Strategy

The term core competency was coined by the leading management experts, CK Prahalad and Gary Hamel in an article in the famous Harvard Business Review. By providing a basis for firms to compete and achieve sustainable competitive advantage, Prahalad and Hamel pioneered the concept and laid the foundation for companies to follow in practice.

Some core competencies that firms might have include technical superiority, its customer relationship management, and processes that are vastly efficient.

In other words, each firm has a specific area in which it does well relative to its competitors, this area of excellence can be reused by the firm in other markets and products, and finally, the area of strength adds value to the consumer.

The implications for real world practice are that core competencies must be nurtured and the business model built around them instead of focusing too much on areas where the firm does not have competency. This is not to say that other competencies must be neglected or ignored. Rather, the idea behind the concept is that firms must leverage upon their core strengths and play to their advantages.

Some Examples

If we take the examples from real world companies and evaluate their core competencies, we find that many firms have benefited from the application of this theory and that they have succeeded in attaining competitive advantage and sustainable strategic advantage.

For instance, the core competencies of Walt Disney Corporation lie in its ability to animate and design its shows, the art of storytelling that has been perfected by the company, and the operation of its theme parks that is done in an efficient and productive manner. Hence, Walt Disney Corporation would be well advised to configure its strategy around these core competencies and build a business model that complements these competencies.

Closing Thoughts

The important aspect to be noted is that core competencies provide the companies with a framework wherein they can identify their core strengths and strategize accordingly. Of course, the identification and evaluation of core competencies must be done as accurately and reliably as possible since the divestment of non-core areas must not lead to the firm missing key areas of operation and competitive advantage.

Finally, care must be taken when building the organizational edifice around the core competencies to avoid the situation where many or too few of the competencies are identified leading to redundancies or scarcity.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Cutting Costs Strategically

MSG Team

Corporate Governance – Definition, Scope and Benefits

MSG Team

Core Competencies – An essential for Organizational Success

MSG Team