MSG Team's other articles

12928 How Relevant is the Corporate Planning Function in the Digital Age of Agile Organizations

Corporate Planning in Earlier Decades Manufacturing Firms In manufacturing firms in the earlier decades, one of the most sought after role was to work in the Corporate Planning Function which was staffed with the Créme De La Créme of Employees trained in Management and skilled with longer term orientation and insights into how the future […]

10202 Loss Occurrence Clause in Reinsurance

Most reinsurance treaties are structured in an excess of loss format. This means that the reinsurer is liable to pay the ceding insurer only when losses exceed a certain amount. For example, the reinsurer is liable to pay the ceding insurer all losses which are above $1 million. If the losses are below $1 million, […]

12775 Cognitive Psychology

Cognitive Psychology is another school of thought which examines the internal processes or cognition and attempts to study the thought processes, memory and the stages involved in cognitive development on a long term basis. The two crucial characteristics of Cognitive Approach which differentiates the Cognitive Psychologists from other schools of thought have been described below: […]

11612 Training in Virtual Teams

In the face of the complex and unique virtual work environment, organizations are required to invest in the training and development of virtual team members. This is to ensure success of these virtual project teams in effectively performing their task activities and successfully delivering the project goals. The overall objective of a well-defined training program […]

9828 Importance of Culture in Business Decisions and Its Implications for All

Increasing Importance of Culture in Corporate Decision Making The Indian Information Technology (IT) bellwether and the market leader in software services, Infosys, announced that it was appointing Salil Parekh as the CEO or the Chief Executive Officer following the resignation of Vishal Sikka, a few months ago. When the announcement was made, the company emphasized […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Decision making need not necessarily be a zero sum game where one party benefits at the expense of the other. For instance, it is common in many organizations for decision makers to favor one group over the other which results in a situation where one group wins and the other group loses. This is the zero sum game hypotheses which indicate that decisions are taken to benefit one group over the other. There is an alternative to this situation and that happens when decision making is done in such a manner that produces synergies instead of losses to one group.

The synergies that we are talking about result when decision making is carried out in such a way that the eventual decision takes into account the needs of all groups and produces a result that approximates the sum substance of each of the players’ interests.

The real life models for this can be seen in the way political parties and governmental organizations practice democratic decision making that satisfies to a large extent the aspirations and interests of all the players. This is done by creating resources to meet the demands of the various groups and investing them to the satisfaction of all the parties.

On the other hand, there are instances (especially in the international geopolitical context) where decision making often results in one nation losing out at the expense of another winning. However, even in the international scenario, such a situation can be avoided if the Ricardian principles of free trade are implemented. According to this, a nation that is good at making one particular product can export that and import some other product from another country which it cannot produce on its own.

Of course, decisions often are zero sum games and the point that we are making in this article is that decisions can be taken by finding a common ground where everybody is better off in the end. For instance, by making the parties forego some amount of resources that they would have got out of the outcome, decision makers can ensure a little bit of everything for everybody.

The point here is that if we have to navigate the turbulent times of the 21st century, we need everyone to sit together and thrash out their differences and arrive at an understanding. This is the only way in which we are going to survive.

Finally, the vision and leadership qualities of the decision makers often play an important role in determining whether decisions result in zero sum situations or whether they result in everybody winning. The reason being it is the case that when decision makers take decisions that is based on their innate vision and leadership abilities, the result of such decisions often is that all the parties to the case are winners. This is the scenario where statesmen and leaders often take decisions by persuading the parties with their charisma and personality. Though this is the ideal situation that might or not might not manifest in reality, this is something that all of us can aspire to in our lives when we have to take decisions.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Curious Observation – First Step in Decision Making Process

MSG Team

The Process of Corporate Decision Making

MSG Team

Conflict Resolution and Decision Making

MSG Team