How Managers Can Handle Performance Reviews with a Mixture of Tact and Firmness
The time of the year when managers and employees alike look forward to is the Appraisal season where they are judged and ranked on their performance over the last cycle. While some organizations have half yearly appraisals, others have yearly appraisals and the timing depends on how the organizational HR policies view the process of […]
Some Thoughts on Specialized and Niche Management Programs
Many management programs are offered by leading business schools that specialize in a particular nice or field of management. Prominent among these programs are the specialized courses offered in Systems, HR, and Finance. For instance, the business schools in Asia like the IIMs (Indian Institute of Management) and XLRI (Xavier Labor Relations Institute) along with […]
Methods of Improving Organizational Knowledge
Knowledge is the new lubricant that runs the world economy. We live in what Alvin Toffler called the “Third Wave Society”. A society built around the new and emerging paradigm around knowledge as the new capital. The information technology and related industries function on the basis of knowledge as the medium of input and output. […]
What is an HR Scorecard and How it Helps Contemporary Organizations?
The Evolution of the HR Function through the Decades Traditionally, Human Resources or HR was viewed as a support function whose primary role was to take care of payroll, time tracking, and disputes between the unions and the organizations. Indeed, in the manufacturing era, the term used for HR functions was personnel management and industrial […]
Talent Management Practices and Corporate Strategies
Organizations which wish to attract the best of talents and retain employees across all levels must have an integrated approach to talent management. According to latest survey findings from Accenture High Performance Report, about 85% senior executives view talent management as a major competitive differentiator for attracting and retaining skilled workforce and developing the highly […]
If you are a student who is planning an MBA (Master of Business Administration) or a Technical Degree, you would no doubt be faced with the choice between going in for a generalized degree or a specialized one.
The former gives you a broad overview of your preferred discipline whereas the latter offers you an opportunity to specialize in a specific niche and make the most of the education.
Indeed, this is the dilemma that Medical Students, Business Graduates, and Engineering students face almost every day of their education as they struggle with the choice between learning a bit about everything as opposed to learning more about one thing.
Further, this dilemma is not restricted to the students alone as even professionals face the choice between joining firms that recruit generalists versus joining companies that hire specialists.
The fact that there is a chance to earn more when you are a specialist and at the same time, find alternative employment difficult is usually the catch that specialists face.
On the other hand, generalists often find themselves not getting ahead beyond a point in their careers since as they move up the corporate ladder; they see that specialists are more in demand as opposed to generalists.
In addition, academics and policymakers also face the dilemma of designing MBA programs that offer a mix of specialization and generalization and at the same time, offering the courses in such a manner that a balance is struck between specialization and generalization.
Indeed, in many countries worldwide, there is a healthy debate going on between those who favor MBA and other higher education programs to focus on specialization as opposed to training future professionals to become generalists or “Jack of All Trades”.
So, how does one resolve the dilemma between opting for specialization versus going in for generalization?
To start with, if you major in Finance and do well, the chances are that an Investment Bank would recruit you with a stratospheric salary and possible foreign posting.
On the other hand, if by any chance, you do not do well during your Masters, the chances are that you would have to settle with a mediocre job in any of the numerous banks and financial institutions that flock to the Business Schools.
Thus, it is clear that the choice of specialization and generalization must be based on your performance and your ambition on realizing your dreams.
On the other hand, if you opt for generalization, the chances are that no matter how well you do, you might not land a job in a Consultancy unless you can show them that your Big Picture vision and personal mission are worth the investment that they would be making on you by hiring you.
Further, although you might have opted for a broad mix of courses, the chances are that most firms are looking for specialists who can bring their expertise of a specific niche to the firm instead of a generalist who “speaks in many tongues” and is not comfortable or proficient in any one of them.
It must also be noted that generalists too command a premium, especially where firms that recruit them for managerial functions straightaway are concerned.
To explain, many firms recruit generalists with work experience for middle management positions straight from the business school without them having to wait for their promotions.
Thus, if you have work experience or are lateral with enough experience under your belt, the chances are that you can be recruited by firms looking for these skills and attributes.
Indeed, in these cases, the chances of generalists are brighter since they already have expertise in a specific niche and all that they have to do is to acquire a broader array of skills to make their education worth the investment.
It is clear that both generalization and specialization have their pluses and minuses and hence, the choice between specialization and generalization ought to be based on the parameters discussed so far.
In addition, many aspiring students often choose the MBA institutes based on their fame for specific niches. In the case of India, while IIMA is known to be good for Investment Banks and Consultants, IIMB is known for Finance, and IIMC is known for specializing in niches that engineers would be comfortable in.
Even in other countries, there is a difference between say a Harvard MBA and a Wharton MBA in terms of the niches that they are famous for.
As for professionals, the choice between specialization and generalization is made easier due to the availability of Executive Management Programs that offer lateral managers and middle managers to refresh themselves on their concepts and acquire expertise in senior managerial skills and attributes.
Thus, with the flourishing Executive Management Programs, professionals who are specialists can become generalists and vice versa and hence, it is the contention here that sometimes, such choices need not be nerve-wracking and instead, be resolved in a smooth manner provided one has the resources to fund an MBA or an Executive MBA either from one’s pocket or from loans and employer contributions.
To conclude, specialization and generalization both have their positives and flipsides and hence, your choice must be made after due diligence based on careful thought and detailed planning based on your competencies, ambitions, and your ability to work hard as well as your drive in making your vision a success and your mission reality.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Current Employment Trends and Their Implications for Business, Society, and Individuals
February 12, 2025
