Personnel Management: Meaning, Nature and its Functions
Personnel management can be defined as obtaining, using and maintaining a satisfied workforce. It is a significant part of management concerned with employees at work and with their relationship within the organization. According to Flippo, “Personnel management is the planning, organizing, compensation, integration and maintainance of people for the purpose of contributing to organizational, individual […]
Qualities in a Professional for Better Relationship with Co Workers
An individual must share a warm relationship with his fellow workers to remain happy and satisfied at work. Don’t fight with your colleagues and spoil the decorum of the office. You need people around to talk to, discuss several issues, evaluate the pros and cons of your ideas and finally come to a solution which […]
The Difference between Business Schools in the West and the East
The Recruitment Process There are many differences between the business schools in the West and the East. Starting with the selection procedure, continuing to the pedagogical methods, including the structure of the courses, and the nature of the placement method, these differences are considerable and worth examining. First, if we start with the selection procedure, […]
Staffing Role of the HR Manager: Strategic Workforce Planning
Staffing and Recruiting during the Boom Years One of the key areas that the HRM unit works with is the staffing function. Hiring and on boarding of employees’ remains a critical activity that many HR managers are yet to master. This is mainly because of the unevenness of the demand and supply in the market […]
Participation and Performance – Importance of Participation
The greatest and widely accepted benefit of participation is the increased work ownership of employee. An employee is better able to relate himself/herself with his or her work and this improves performance and efficiency at work. John Newstrom and Keith Davis worked extensively upon the subject. They identified three variables that lead to increased performance. […]
If you are a student who is planning an MBA (Master of Business Administration) or a Technical Degree, you would no doubt be faced with the choice between going in for a generalized degree or a specialized one.
The former gives you a broad overview of your preferred discipline whereas the latter offers you an opportunity to specialize in a specific niche and make the most of the education.
Indeed, this is the dilemma that Medical Students, Business Graduates, and Engineering students face almost every day of their education as they struggle with the choice between learning a bit about everything as opposed to learning more about one thing.
Further, this dilemma is not restricted to the students alone as even professionals face the choice between joining firms that recruit generalists versus joining companies that hire specialists.
The fact that there is a chance to earn more when you are a specialist and at the same time, find alternative employment difficult is usually the catch that specialists face.
On the other hand, generalists often find themselves not getting ahead beyond a point in their careers since as they move up the corporate ladder; they see that specialists are more in demand as opposed to generalists.
In addition, academics and policymakers also face the dilemma of designing MBA programs that offer a mix of specialization and generalization and at the same time, offering the courses in such a manner that a balance is struck between specialization and generalization.
Indeed, in many countries worldwide, there is a healthy debate going on between those who favor MBA and other higher education programs to focus on specialization as opposed to training future professionals to become generalists or “Jack of All Trades”.
So, how does one resolve the dilemma between opting for specialization versus going in for generalization?
To start with, if you major in Finance and do well, the chances are that an Investment Bank would recruit you with a stratospheric salary and possible foreign posting.
On the other hand, if by any chance, you do not do well during your Masters, the chances are that you would have to settle with a mediocre job in any of the numerous banks and financial institutions that flock to the Business Schools.
Thus, it is clear that the choice of specialization and generalization must be based on your performance and your ambition on realizing your dreams.
On the other hand, if you opt for generalization, the chances are that no matter how well you do, you might not land a job in a Consultancy unless you can show them that your Big Picture vision and personal mission are worth the investment that they would be making on you by hiring you.
Further, although you might have opted for a broad mix of courses, the chances are that most firms are looking for specialists who can bring their expertise of a specific niche to the firm instead of a generalist who “speaks in many tongues” and is not comfortable or proficient in any one of them.
It must also be noted that generalists too command a premium, especially where firms that recruit them for managerial functions straightaway are concerned.
To explain, many firms recruit generalists with work experience for middle management positions straight from the business school without them having to wait for their promotions.
Thus, if you have work experience or are lateral with enough experience under your belt, the chances are that you can be recruited by firms looking for these skills and attributes.
Indeed, in these cases, the chances of generalists are brighter since they already have expertise in a specific niche and all that they have to do is to acquire a broader array of skills to make their education worth the investment.
It is clear that both generalization and specialization have their pluses and minuses and hence, the choice between specialization and generalization ought to be based on the parameters discussed so far.
In addition, many aspiring students often choose the MBA institutes based on their fame for specific niches. In the case of India, while IIMA is known to be good for Investment Banks and Consultants, IIMB is known for Finance, and IIMC is known for specializing in niches that engineers would be comfortable in.
Even in other countries, there is a difference between say a Harvard MBA and a Wharton MBA in terms of the niches that they are famous for.
As for professionals, the choice between specialization and generalization is made easier due to the availability of Executive Management Programs that offer lateral managers and middle managers to refresh themselves on their concepts and acquire expertise in senior managerial skills and attributes.
Thus, with the flourishing Executive Management Programs, professionals who are specialists can become generalists and vice versa and hence, it is the contention here that sometimes, such choices need not be nerve-wracking and instead, be resolved in a smooth manner provided one has the resources to fund an MBA or an Executive MBA either from one’s pocket or from loans and employer contributions.
To conclude, specialization and generalization both have their positives and flipsides and hence, your choice must be made after due diligence based on careful thought and detailed planning based on your competencies, ambitions, and your ability to work hard as well as your drive in making your vision a success and your mission reality.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Current Employment Trends and Their Implications for Business, Society, and Individuals
February 12, 2025
