Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
Price to Book Value Ratio – Formula, Meaning, Assumptions and Interpretation
Formula Price to Book Value = Current Market Price / Total Assets – Intangible Assets The value of assets is taken from the most recently published balance sheet. Meaning The price to book value ratio looks at an immediate liquidation scenario. Investors therefore compare the price that they are paying for the company against what […]
The Founder’s Dilemma – Startup Finance
Entrepreneurship is all about making decisions in the face of uncertainty. Entrepreneurship involves beginning a journey that the founder does not currently have the resources to complete. For instance, when any start-up is first formed it does not have the money, assets, or human capital required to create value. It is the central job of […]
Myths Surrounding Toys R Us Bankruptcy
Toys R Us is an iconic American company. According to recent surveys, Toys R Us has a market share of more than 15%. With this market share, the company should be in a commanding position in the toys market. However, ironically it is filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. This means that it is still likely […]
Conservatism Bias
In accounting and in finance, conservatism is generally considered to be a positive quality. However, studies in behavioral finance have shown that this may not be the case. This is because conservatism bias is one of the most profound biases which impact the investment decisions of an average investor. In this article, we will understand […]
Continuing from the previous two articles, we will look at some more counterintuitive steps that need to be taken to calculate the cash flows which should then be discounted to arrive at the worth of the project. This article will cover the concepts of how sunk costs should be treated as well as how allocated overheads may at times be different from the overhead value that we have to use in our cash flow calculations.
Sunk costs are expenses that have happened in the past that will not be affected by the current decision. The second part is very important. Defining sunk costs just as expenses that have happened in the past would be inappropriate if our current decisions affect them.
Consider a case when the firm has already spent $1 million on a project. However, the project has turned out to be unsuccessful till date. It has not churned out any positive cash flows till date. Now, the company is faced with a choice. The choice is whether it should invest more in the project that it has spent $1million on or whether it should pursue a new project.
The important point is not the answer. The important point here is the thought process that will be used to arrive at the answer. The correct thought process understands that $1m already spent has nothing to do with the new choice they are faced with. The incremental dollars also deserve their best use and hence the decision must be taken solely on the basis of NPV of additional money that is going to be spent. The old $1m is not affected by the decision that has to be taken now. Hence it is irrelevant and must be completely ignored during the decision making.
Overheads are costs that cannot be assigned to any activity directly. Assigning them within the company’s different departments and projects therefore becomes a problem. This problem is solved by accountants through the concept of allocation. Since the track of where the money was actually spent cannot be kept, accountants assume a basis and costs are allocated on that basis. The problem is that these allocated costs may not be good for our cash flow analysis purpose.
For instance, consider the fact that there are 3 departments A, B and C. The total overheads of the company now are $100. The allocation base used is labor hours and the proportion in which these costs are split is 2:2:1. Hence A, B and C have allocated overheads of $40, $40 and $20.
Now, consider what happens when the 4th department is introduced. The fourth department has an additional overhead cost of $20 taking total overheads to $120. However, based on the labor hours basis the new ratio is 3:3:1:3
Based on this the overheads allocated to department A, B, C and D are $36, $36, $12 and $36 respectively. So, for department D, we have an allocated overheads cost of $36 as opposed to incremental overheads cost of $20. Since, cash flow analysis is all about incremental costs, it is essential that we take into consideration the incremental costs and not the allocated costs while performing the calculations.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
