MSG Team's other articles

11613 Trait Theory of Leadership – Advantages and its Limitations

The trait model of leadership is based on the characteristics of many leaders – both successful and unsuccessful – and is used to predict leadership effectiveness. The resulting lists of traits are then compared to those of potential leaders to assess their likelihood of success or failure. Scholars taking the trait approach attempted to identify […]

11655 Different Types of Change

Happened Change This kind of change is unpredictable in nature and is usually takes place due to the impact of the external factors. Happened change is profound and can be traumatic as it’s consequences are unknown and out of direct control. This kind of a change happens when an organization reaches the plateau stage in […]

10838 Psychology as a Science and the use of Scientific Methods in Psychological Research

Psychology as a field of study has evolved considerably over last few years with different perspectives, approaches and research interests of psychologists and researchers. But they all have one thing in common and that is relying on the usage of scientific methods. The field of psychology as a scientific area of study is important for […]

12322 Altman’s Z Score Model

Academicians and practitioners from all over the world have been tried very hard to come up with a model which would help them to predict bankruptcy in a firm before it occurred. In the previous article, we have already studied how the expected default frequency model was used and what its advantages and limitations were. […]

12777 Collateralized Debt Obligations: Advantages and Disadvantages

In the previous article, we studied about how collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) are derivative instruments that have been built on top of other derivative instruments. They are complicated to understand and risky to trade. However, despite the various negative accusations against collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), they continue to be very popular. This is because they […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

A risk management plan can never be perfect. However, the degree of its success depends upon risk analysis, management policies, planning and activities.

A well-defined management plan can be successful only if risks are properly accessed. And if not, the main objective of risk management plan itself is defeated.

Critical evaluation of a risk management plan at every stage is very necessary especially at an early stage. It will allow companies to discover the flaws before it gets into the action.

Once you’re through the process, you can address the issues and then introduce it.

The below mentioned steps can help in analyzing and evaluating a risk management plan:

  1. Problem Analysis: Keep a note of all the events and activities of a risk management plan. Check out the problems arising from their implementation and assess if they have a serious impact on the whole process. Make a note of those that have serious implications.

  2. Match the Outcomes of a Risk Management Plans with its Objectives: Ends justify means. Check if the possible outcomes of a risk management plan are in tandem with its pre-defined objectives. It plays a vital role in analyzing if the plan in action is perfect. If it produces desired results, it does not need to be changed. But if it fails to produce what is required can be a really serious issue. After all, an organization deploys its resources including time, money and human capital and above all, the main aim of the organization is also defeated.

  3. Evaluate If All the Activities in the Plan are Effective: It requires a thorough investigation of each activity of a risk management plan. Checking out the efficiency of all the activities and discovering the flaws in their implementation allow you to analyze the whole plan systematically.

  4. Evaluate the Business Environment: A thorough study and critical evaluation of business environment where a risk management plan is to be implemented is essential. Take time to assess, analyze and decide what exactly is required.

  5. Make Possible Changes in Faulty Activities: After evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of all the activities, try to make possible changes in the action plan to get desired results. It may be very time consuming but is necessary for successful implementation of your risk management plan.

  6. Review the Changed Activities: After making changes in already existing activities and events of a risk management plan, go for a final review. Try to note down the possible outcomes of the changed activity and match them with the main objectives of the risk management plan. Go ahead in case they are in line with them.

Evaluating a risk management plan sometimes can be very frustrating. It is definitely a time consuming process and also requires more of human efforts. Therefore, it is always better to analyze and evaluate a plan at every stage otherwise it will result in wastage of time, finances and efforts. In order to keep a check on it, specialized teams of risk managers can be appointed. The whole event can be outsourced to a risk management firm. The professionals at the firm can help you design, develop, implement and evaluate a risk management plan for your company.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team

The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

MSG Team

Credit Derivatives: An Introduction

MSG Team