Allocating Overheads in Job Order Costing
Tracking direct labor and materials that have been used in a job can be done with a fair degree of precision. That is not the real problem when it comes to costing. The real problem is with allocation of overheads. Usually, they have very little correlation to any specific activity. They are the result of […]
Black Wednesday of 1992: The Day the Pound Sterling Came Under Attack
The Black Wednesday of 1992 refers to the momentous day when the British Pound was under attack by currency speculators. This day created history in the Foreign Exchange markets because of the fact that the Pound was considered to be one of the strongest fiat currencies in the world. In fact it was the reserve […]
Gordon Growth Model: Pros and Cons
The Gordon growth model is a well known and widely known model for valuing equity securities. However, as with every model, there are some pros and cons that need to be understood before this model is applied. Understanding of these pros and cons will help differentiating between situations wherein it would be prudent to apply […]
The Nordic Crisis of 1992
The Nordic crisis of 1992 refers to the series of bank runs and currency crisis that shook Finland, Sweden as well as Norway in the early 1990’s. This was the first major national banking crisis since the 1930’s (if wars are not taken into account). Thus, an important belief that the fractional reserve banking system […]
Forex Trading vs. Regular Trading
Trading foreign exchange is markedly different from trading other financial assets in the market. There are certain unique features of foreign exchange which make it so different. In this article we have listed down these features and explain how they influence an individual’s ability to trade the market. Currencies Come in Pairs The biggest difference […]
The dividend discount models assume that the investors have no control over the payout policy of the firm whatsoever. This is true for the case of the minority shareholder. Hence, it is said that as far as the minority shareholder is concerned, dividend discount models may be the best tools for valuing a firm.
This may not be the case when potentially bigger shareholders come into picture. Bigger shareholders find the free cash flow approach much more suitable for their needs. Thus free cash flow approach is said to have the perspective of a big ticket acquirer.
In this article, we will compare the dividend discount model and the free cash flow model.
The dividend discount models use dividends as a proxy for the firm’s operating performance. The underlying logic is that a firm can continue to pay dividends in the long run only if its underlying business is stable and prosperous.
Multiple cases in the stock market have shown that this need not necessarily be the case. Firm’s can borrow money and keep on paying dividends and mask the fact that the underlying business is rapidly deteriorating. Alternatively, firms could have robust business models and may need cash to invest in them and hence may feel that paying out dividends is sub-optimal utilization of cash.
The correlation between dividends and underlying performance is just that, a correlation! Dividends are neither the cause nor the effect of good performance.
It just happens to be the case that a lot of good businesses tend to pay dividends too! Dividends are just used to distribute the wealth. They are in no way, signals that wealth has been created by the company.
Free cash flow, on the other hand, is an almost certain signal that the firm is in good financial health. A firm cannot free cash flow by borrowing more money or by creating fictitious accounting entries. For free cash flow to be present the operations have to be efficient and the firm has to be creating value.
The presence of free cash flow therefore is a huge positive signal. The absence may not be considered to be a sure shot negative thing. When companies are in their growth phase, they need cash. Hence, in such scenarios the present day free cash flow may be negative. However, it is expected to be much better in the future.
Thus, free cash flow as a metric, provides a much deeper insight into the workings of a firm.
Also, dividend discount models have the perspective of a minority shareholder who has no control over the proceedings. They have no option but to agree to the diktat of the board of directors. On the other hand, larger shareholders may be able to purchase a significant holding which might put them in a position to control or at least influence the decisions of the board of directors. They may therefore be able to get a payout policy passed which may be as per their convenience.
For larger shareholders, dividends are completely irrelevant. Neither do they signal a firm’s underlying performance, nor are they the only way that they as investors can plow back their cash.
All being said, the free cash flow models also have a major disadvantage. This disadvantage is that free cash flow is very difficult to predict.
While dividends are completely in the hands of the management and can be accurately estimated based on empirical evidence, free cash flow is influenced by numerous factors and predicting it is a challenge to say the least. However, the challenge is worthwhile since a more accurate valuation is derived using this model.
Lastly, in some cases there may be a huge difference in the valuation derived from dividend discount models and from free cash flow models. Smaller differences can simply be ignored. However, when differences are large, they may be because of the control premium that some large investors are willing to pay.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Calculating Free Cash Flow to the Firm: Method #2: Cash Flow From Operations
February 12, 2025
