MSG Team's other articles

9022 Drivers of Employee Engagement

Employee Engagement has transcended from being the latest business buzzword to being recognized by organizations as a tool that positively influences business performance. This linkage between organization performance and employee engagement was researched by ISR in 2006 by means of world-wide survey. The ISR study reveals that companies with high engagement scores saw an increase […]

8747 Knowledge Management – Meaning and Important Concepts

Introduction It has been extensively identified that knowledge is an important aspect for an economy to develop. We are seeing a lot of transformation rapidly happening in our society. Every day we are seeing that we are becoming more and more dependent on knowledge. If this is the case with our societies, the scenario is […]

10232 Objectives of Management

The main objectives of management are: Getting Maximum Results with Minimum Efforts – The main objective of management is to secure maximum outputs with minimum efforts & resources. Management is basically concerned with thinking & utilizing human, material & financial resources in such a manner that would result in best combination. This combination results in […]

12173 Relationship between planning and controlling

Planning and controlling are two separate fuctions of management, yet they are closely related. The scope of activities if both are overlapping to each other. Without the basis of planning, controlling activities becomes baseless and without controlling, planning becomes a meaningless exercise. In absense of controlling, no purpose can be served by. Therefore, planning and […]

9644 How Human Resource Managers can deal with Difficult Employees

Introduction One of the key challenges that HR (Human Resource) Managers face in any organization is how they respond to employees violating organizational policies and plain disgruntled employees who are angry with their appraisals and consequent pay hikes and bonuses. Indeed, how astutely and adroitly the HR Managers deal with such employees determines their competency […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Although the 5 Why’s is an elementary tool when it comes to six sigma methodology, it is nonetheless important. Since there is a high degree of subjectivity involved with the usage of the tool, it is suggested that it be used only by a team of cross functional experts to obtain best results. Here is the list of the steps to follow to get best results:

Step 1 - Be Careful While Creating Problem Statements: The main goal of the Five Why’s tool is to ensure that we move past symptoms and make headway into finding and solving the root cause. It is therefore important that the problem be framed in the correct manner. As the old saying goes “A problem well defined is half solved”. The definition of the problem should be objective i.e. it must include facts and measurements. It must leave no room for ambiguity for words like “more”, “less” etc. Its only when the problems can be defined in concrete numerical terms can a desired solution be defined and worked upon.

Step 2 - Honesty – Avoid the Blame Game: Power and politics in an organization are a severe hindrance towards moving forward with the Five Why’s analysis. Many times brainstorming sessions do not work because there is deliberate shielding of problems by departments to avoid being penalized for being inefficient in the past. It should be ensured that the participants are indeed objective. There must be no penalties on bringing out past and present shortcomings, instead it must be encouraged.

Also the rules of the discussion must be made clear prior to beginning the process. The focus must always be on results and not the people involved. Organizations that move beyond people are the ones that succeed with their six sigma endeavors.

Step 3 - Parent Child Diagram: The first focus should be on getting as many problems on the discussion board as possible. Once this is done and the answers begin to get repetitive, one must start mapping the levels of causes. For example A causes B, B causes C and C causes D. In this case A is a Level 1 cause, B is a level 2 cause and C is a level 3 cause when it comes to solving D as a problem. Solving A would pull the rug beneath all other issues and the management will be able to use much more with limited resources than it would otherwise have done.

Step 4 - Ensure That the Cause is Systematic: A systematic cause is one where the system is to be corrected, not the parties in the system. A six sigma process does not allow error even if the participants willfully want to err. Hence the root cause analysis should ensure that it is not degenerating to a finger pointing exercise. The idea should be to make the system so efficient that it does not allow any errors whatsoever.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Executive Pay: The Curious Case of Carlos Ghosn’s Arrest

MSG Team

A Brief on Customs Brokerage

MSG Team