Arguments against Tax Competition
February 12, 2025
Founders spend a lot of their time trying to understand how to deal with potential investors. They try to understand the various techniques that need to be deployed in order to ensure that prospective investors view the startup company as a compelling proposition. In their quest to project their startup company as the best, founders […]
In the previous article, we have already seen how pension funds have been adversely affected by an increasing amount of longevity risk. The increase in the average lifespan of people is definitely a positive development. However, it has an adverse impact on the financial situation of most pension funds. In order to mitigate longevity risks, […]
Money markets are large and liquid markets. They exist in almost every country which has a developed financial system. The existence of a thriving and highly liquid money market in every economy of the world is not a mere coincidence. There are certain functions that are performed by the money market. Some of these functions […]
In the previous articles, we have already read about commercial papers and why they are an important segment of the money market. In most cases discussed earlier, commercial papers were related to unsecured debt. However, this need not always be the case. It is possible for commercial paper to be backed by other securities or […]
Startup valuation is one of the most important issues faced by startup companies in their earlier years. On the one hand, these startup companies are trying to maximize their valuation while giving over a minimum amount of ownership to the investors. Investors on the other hand want to obtain the maximum stock possible. The interests […]
Before the advent of globalization, every country in the world was working in a vacuum when it came to taxes. This is because the companies which operate in these countries did not have any choice when it came to tax rates.
Their only choices were to accept the tax rates or to stop production. If they did not like the tax policy of the country, they could undertake political protests.
However, there was nothing else they could do to increase their own financial gain. In economic terms, it can be said that the government is the monopoly supplier.
Hence, like all monopoly suppliers, the government has no incentive to reduce its costs, and hence inefficiency becomes the norm.
All this changed with globalization. After globalization, countries were free to incorporate and operate in different parts of the world. If they did not like the tax policy of a country, they could simply move to another country. This policy of free movement of capital gave rise to tax competition.
Tax competition means that countries have to compete with each other in order to get companies to incorporate and operate within their boundaries. Since countries now had to attract companies, a wave of rationalizations and tax cuts followed. There are several benefits to tax competition. Some of them have been explained in this article.
As such, they would keep increasing budgets by incurring non-productive expenses for personal political gains. Without tax competition, politicians are free to channel the resources of the country in the backward direction i.e., from the industrious to the idle.
Tax completion encourages the government to be lean. Only if a government can reduce its wasteful expenditure can it lower the tax rate, and only after the tax rate is lowered can more companies be attracted.
Then, politicians would selectively give tax breaks to certain companies and distort capital allocation in the economy. This chain has been broken by globalization. This is because firstly, entrepreneurs nowadays are not restricted to domestic capital.
If they provide an efficient product or service, they can obtain money from foreign investors as well. The capital pool is much larger. Also, if the government’s tax policy is not efficient, then the company can simply migrate to a different country. Hence, government interference in the allocation of capital is minimized.
They are supposed to provide services such as electricity and transport at low rates. With the advent of tax competition, companies now look at countries where they can get the best value for money.
Hence, sometimes companies may choose to go for a country with a higher tax rate if that means getting access to better public services such as an educated workforce that has access to a good healthcare system.
However, it can be brought to a minimum. The lower the taxes in an economy, the more productively the resources are used.
Hence, if the tax is reduced, it leads to more money in the hands of the workers. This higher disposable income can then lead to increased consumption. This increases the overall economic activity in a nation, which leads to the collection of more taxes.
Hence, it lowered its tax rates. Now, there are a lot of companies which have headquartered in Ireland. Therefore, low tax rates have been the main reason why companies have migrated to Ireland, which has led to economic development in that region.
The good thing about tax competition is that once a few governments adopt this model, the others do not have a choice. This is what has happened in the modern world.
After most of the western governments adopted tax competition, other developing countries had to follow suit. Also, countries cannot stop tax competition unilaterally.
They have to get other governments to agree. For instance, European governments have been trying to harmonize their tax rates to eliminate tax advantages but have not been able to do so.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *