Formulating Information Security and Data Protection Policies When Firms Go Digital
The Paradigm Shift Needed as the World Transitions from Analogue to Digital Information Security and Data Protection are central to any organization’s tech policies and more so, when Digitalization happens, as then the whole organizational processes and methodologies are entirely virtual making them more vulnerable to Data Theft. Indeed, having effective Information Security and Data […]
The Pharma Sector and Intellectual Property Rights: Pros and Cons
The Case for Patents The Pharma sector is often caught in the fight over whether the enforcement of IPR or Intellectual Property Rights should be followed or whether the sector exists for alleviating the health concerns of the poor and the needy thereby ensuring affordable drugs to the masses. Before we launch into the discussion […]
Talent Management and Corporate Strategy: Aligned for Driving Excellence
Talent Management in the contemporary scenario has received increasing importance from the corporate world and have been acknowledged as the key for providing a competitive edge and a leadership advantage by developing the top talents and resources in an organizations. Talent Management can be regarded as a process of acquisition, hiring and retaining the most […]
Introduction to Flow Chart as BPI Tool
Business Process Improvement programs have become the major tools for Organizations to keep working on their internal operations to enhance the operational efficiencies, to implement new processes in line with business requirement and to eliminate redundancies and wastage. When the Organizations used to be managed and run based on hierarchy and centralized decision making, the […]
Production Module – BOM and Routing
Bill of Material (BOM) is a base functionality of setting up production module of an ERP system. A manufactured item consists of components, which are used to build the product through production operation(s). The main use of BOM is to define product structure of a manufactured end item. Routing is another important base of production […]
The Harvard Business Review in 1992 took the business world by storm when Kaplan and Norton introduced the idea of balanced scorecard.
They argued that even though strategic management was being pursued as an organization wide goal in companies worldwide, in effect they were doing a post-mortem of the business situation at hand.
Measurement was done only on the basis of financial information. Financial information reflected past performance.
There were no indicators of future performance as well as the strategic resources of human capital, intellectual capital as well as streamlined resources that were included in the measurement.
Citing this as the detrimental cause, Kaplan and Norton outlined a framework wherein performance will be measured on multiple dimensions. The weights given to financial parameters be proportional to their importance.
The combined share of factors that predict the future state of business had a greater weight than past performance.
This move was critical as managers would now have to ensure that they do not follow short sighted behavior to make their performance look better.
The number game had been changed to include qualitative aspects as well.
Kaplan and Norton realized that processes were the way that a company performs its operations. The superiority of a company is therefore directly related to the sustainable competitive advantage that its process help it to gain over its competitors.
Hence, not monitoring or measuring the processes would discourage companies to place a continuous focus on improving the processes. The balanced scorecard therefore recommends that processes get equal importance (if not more) as compared to the financial indicators.
This recommendation by Kaplan and Norton and its worldwide adoption by the Fortune 500 companies gave a thrust to the practice of Business Process Management.
Since every manager’s variable pay would, to some extent, depend upon the improvement they bring in the process, everyone in the organization started looking for ways and means to improve the process.
Business Process Management (BPM) was no longer the impetus of a handful of managers and executives located in remote locations.
BPM became the prerogative of each employee. The suggestion boxes that are seen in canteens worldwide are a symbol of this movement wherein the management solicits BPM ideas from all its employees and rewards those ideas which are found good enough to be adopted.
Real time Data: First and foremost is the fact that information becomes available to management when it is most required. A dynamic dashboard can be prepared which is updated real time and managers can immediately identify any discrepancy and work to correct it.
Technology facilitates this real time transfer of data and arranges it in a particular format to create actionable information for the management.
Adding dimensions to the scorecard: A balanced scorecard will not give undue importance to any characteristic of a process. It recognizes that different processes can be measured by different metrics.
For instance, grievance redressal must be fast, even if it is a bit expensive. Hence measuring this process on costs will lead it in the wrong direction.
Most often, the measurement is done based on a combination of metrics designed each process and given weights.
Instead of giving weights arbitrarily, technology is harnessed and Analytic Hierarchy programming (AHP) is used to come up with appropriate weights that will ensure that no one factor gets undue emphasis and tilts the organizations focus.
The Balanced Scorecard therefore brings the concept of BPM to the strategic level. Also it provides a good mechanism to measure whether the process improvements are taking the organization in the correct direction.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Continuous Improvement and Business Process Re-Engineering
February 12, 2025
