Stress Testing to Manage Risks in Financial Institutions
What is Stress Testing? Stress testing is a type of simulation model which is used to manage risks in banks and other financial institutions. As a part of stress testing, various mathematical and analytical techniques are deployed to understand how an organization would react to adverse outcomes in the external environment. Stress testing is useful […]
Strategic Finance and Competitive Advantage
Globalization has led to increased competition. Artificial boundaries no longer stop competitors from entering markets and even dominating them. This is the reason that having a distinct and clear competitive advantage has become important for most organizations. However, a lot of companies do not have this competitive advantage. This is because competitive advantages do not […]
Introduction to Financial Markets and Institutions
There are certain types of financial markets and financial institutions that are found in almost every country in the world. For instance, most countries where economic activities take place have an established stock exchange and a banking system. Each of these institutions is different and hence perform different functions. However, together, these financial markets and […]
Who Uses Accounting Data ?
Financial reporting is used by a wide variety of users for a wide variety of purposes. For this reason it has been difficult to set a common framework of accounting. The many stakeholders often have contrasting needs from accounting information. Let’s look at the stakeholders and their need for accounting data: Capital Markets: Accounting information […]
Equity Valuation: Definition, Importance and Process
Throughout finance, one rule always holds true. The general belief is that the value of any asset or security is exactly equal to the discounted present value of all the cash flows that can be derived from it in future periods. Using this principle, one can easily value securities like debt. This is because they […]
In the previous few articles we have come across different metrics that can be used to choose amongst competing projects. These metrics help the company identify the project that will add maximum value and helps make informed decisions to maximize the wealth of the firm.
We saw how the NPV rule was better than IRR and the profitability index and how decisions based on NPV are supposedly more accurate.
However, we need to understand that there is a difference between how the NPV rule is stated in text books and how it is applied in real life worldwide.
This difference arises because when we consider capital budgeting, we are working under the fundamental assumption that the firm has access to efficient markets. This means that if the required rate of return is greater than the opportunity cost of capital, or if the project has an NPV greater than zero, the firm can always finance its projects by raising money from the markets even if it doesn’t have any. Thus for practical purposes, the money at the firms disposal is unlimited.
However, in reality this may not be the case. True, that firms can always raise money and bigger firms can raise as much funds as they want to, but many times firms themselves place restrictions on the amount of fund raising that they undertake.
These restrictions could be placed because of the following reasons:
This restriction placed on the amount of capital that the company has, nullifies the assumption inherent in capital budgeting. Thus, what happens in real life is a slightly modified version of capital budgeting. Financial analysts have a name for this. They call it “Capital Rationing”.
So capital rationing is nothing but capital budgeting with modified rules. Now instead of choosing every project that has an NPV greater than zero, the firm uses a different approach.
All projects with a positive NPV qualify for a possible investment. These projects are then ranked according to their attractiveness. The firm then invests in the top3 or top 5 projects (based on their resources). So, here a finite amount of capital is being rationed amongst projects as opposed to an infinite capital assumption.
But, how does the firm decide which projects are the most attractive? Simply ranking the projects with higher NPV will be incorrect. This is because we are not paying attention to the input we are putting in.
We are simply paying attention to the output which is obviously incorrect. What if a project with a slightly higher NPV requires double the investment as compared to another project? Is it still a good bet?
Obviously not and to solve this problem and ration capital effectively, companies have come up with a metric called the Profitability Index. The profitability index is nothing but the NPV of the project divided by the amount of its investment.
Profitability Index = NPV/Investment
So we are simply looking at the NPV amount per dollar of investment. Projects with highest NPV per dollar of investment are considered more attractive and the investment dollars are first allocated to them so that the returns of the firm are maximized.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
