MSG Team's other articles

10017 Inventory Costs – Ordering Cost, Carrying Cost and Stock Out Cost

Inventory procurement, storage and management is associated with huge costs associated with each these functions. Inventory costs are basically categorized into three headings: Ordering Cost Carrying Cost Shortage or stock out Cost & Cost of Replenishment Cost of Loss, pilferage, shrinkage and obsolescence etc. Cost of Logistics Sales Discounts, Volume discounts and other related costs. […]

12363 The Argument against Planned Obsolescence

Planned obsolescence is often considered to be a part of the capitalist ideology. The supposed logic behind planned obsolescence is that capitalist companies put inferior components in their products. As a result, these products do not last as long. Since the products break down sooner, the customers are forced to buy new products. Opponents of […]

10955 Reliability and Redundancy in Production Management

Introduction Product quality determines the success with the product. One of the key drivers of quality is the performance of the product over a period of time. Performance of product is determined by the reliability and redundancy. Reliability increases the efficiency while redundancy increases the current capability and expectations. Any production organization sets a goal […]

10514 Operations Scheduling and Workplace Planning

Introduction Scheduling and workplace planning is the final step in operation planning and design. Operation’s scheduling and workplace planning is implemented during transformation of input to output. Scheduling deals with production of required quantity of product within the required time frame. Workplace planning deals with allocation of resources with priority to work job with first […]

10420 How Nations, Like Firms, Must Decide What to Make and What to Buy ?

Why Nations are Similar to Firms When Deciding on What to Make and What to Buy Businesses often decide on what to make themselves and what to buy from outside. Indeed, any business must first determine what its core competency is and which sector it would be based in and then, ensure that its processes, […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The purpose of measurement system is to validate the measurements before they are considered as factual data and used as a basis for decision making. Any experienced Six Sigma executive knows the reality that the measurement system is nowhere nearly as good as you think it is. People who conduct the measurement system analysis for the first time are surprised to find that it is not rare to find measurements that are 30% or more off the mark in the organizations measurement system. Here is a review of the causes that lead to such widespread variations:

People: Probably the single most important cause of measurement system variation is the people involved. If measurements need to be taken repetitively, it becomes a monotonous task and sometimes errors are made. Also, many times employees wilfully avoid work and fudge the measurement numbers. A system where people were entrusted the job of taking measurements is a thing of the past. Quality guru Juran has made it explicit that measurements related to process efficiency must be collected by non-human means.

Equipment: Faulty equipment is another major factor which result in getting inaccurate measurements. It is not uncommon to find machines that are worn out and/or not properly calibrated. This is true particularly at the extreme ends of the operating range of the machine. Regular maintenance and calibration of the machines is essential. If the measurements are critical to the functioning of the process, the latest and the most high tech measurement systems need to be installed. If we get what we measure, we must measure in the best possible way, isn’t it!

Computational Complexity: This reason is closely linked to the human cause of measurement systems error. However, here the error is not caused by negligence or wilful manipulation. Sometimes, complex metrics are designed. However, the design of this metric is not correctly communicated to the concerned people. Hence we get faulty software tools and/or operators with incorrect knowledge.

Lack of Standard Procedures: It is important that the important metrics of the measurement systems be defined. Such a definition should be communicated to every person that needs to know it. The definition must be reached by consensus and the procedure to arrive at the numerical value of the metric must be explicitly stated inside a manual. Failure to do so can lead to different people having different notions about the same metric. Hence, at a systemic level, you could even end up comparing apples to oranges, if you are not careful enough!

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Characteristics of Data – Central Tendency and Dispersion

MSG Team

Steps Involved in Conducting a Measurement System Analysis

MSG Team

Six Sigma – Outputs in the Measure Phase

MSG Team