MSG Team's other articles

9861 Importance of Public Relations Experts

Public relations refers to the practice of enhancing an organization’s reputation and image in the minds of target audience through ethical means. Public Relations experts strive hard to maintain a cordial relation between the organization (key members) and stakeholders, investors, employees,partners and so on. It is the public relations manager’s key responsibility to ensure that […]

8874 Defining Organizational Purpose in the Post Pandemic World

The pandemic induced by the Corona Virus has fundamentally changed the way organizations operate. However, the counter measures taken then were simply firefighting, knee jerk reactions by organizations to a curveball thrown their way due to the disruption of normal working conditions. But will those changes and efforts measure up in the post pandemic world? […]

11637 Truly Great Leadership is All about Walking the Talk in All Aspects of Being Leaders

What Makes Some Leaders Truly Great There are leaders and then, there are Leaders. To explain, any entity, whether commercial or social or political or administrative has leaders leading them who are expected to have a vision on where they want their domains and the followers to reach and at the same time, have a […]

10147 Leadership in the Time of Epic Changes and Struggles Over Ethics and Values

Leadership in Times of Crisis The world is changing at a frenetic pace and with these changes; the world of business is being affected as well. No longer can business leaders take their positions of their companies for granted and instead, they have to contend with slipping market share, decrease in profits, shareholder activism, and […]

12261 Adjusting to Changing Organization Culture

The work culture represents the ideologies, principles, policies and beliefs of the organization. The individual’s style of working, his behaviour and ways of interaction also contribute to the culture of the organization. There are several reasons which lead to a change in the organization culture. Change in management, poor financial conditions, revisions in goals and […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The closed and open model approach to the study of public administration focuses on the organization itself. One way to study complex organizations is to view them as an open or a closed system. Before we try to understand the open and close system with respect to the study of public administration in general and organizations in specific, let us make an effort to know what an open and a closed system are.

An open system is a system which interacts and exchanges matter with its environment, imagine a pond while a closed system remains isolated from its environment; think an aquarium. While studying complex organizations American sociologist James D Thompson published a book in 1967 called Organization in Action in which he analyzed the behaviors of the complex organization as entities in action. He studied the organization in the light of their technologies and environment and thus he came to identify the meaning of a closed and open system within organizational context.

According to Thompson, an organization is called a close system when:

  • The resources of an organization are employed in a functional manner
  • Each component of the organization contributes to the logic of the system where controlled mechanisms are employed to diminish uncertainties

The examples he gave of a closed system were Taylor and his Scientific Management, Weber’s concept of beurocracy and Gulick and Urwick’s Administrative Management.

Thompson also defined an open system with respect to organizations, he said that: The complex organization is a set of interdependent parts which together make up a whole because each contributes something and receives something from the whole which in turn is interdependent with some larger environment. So an open system is dynamic, full of surprises as well as uncertainties. Systems keep evolving through a continuous process of development and strive to attain homeostasis or the state of equilibrium.

An important case study was carried out by Philip Selznick in 1940s to study the open system approach to organizational analysis. He conducted his research on the emerging Tennessee Valley Authority entitled TVA and Grass Roots (1949).

He focused his research on the aspects of decentralization and involvement of already existing local and state agencies, with a view, to practice democratic planning. It was during this case study that he defined an open system also known as the institutional approach, about which we know from the previous chapter.

According to Selznick, an organization is understood to be a means to achieve goals but the members of the organization act more than just means; they participate whole heartedly with each individual equipped with different skills, expertise, motivations and desires.

An organization also needs to interact with parties, interest groups and other agencies, which communicate and influence the organization; and each other.

From the managerial context, an organization cannot take only one strict approach that is, either of an open or a closed system, it needs to keep switching positions as and when need arises to achieve the stability and certainty required to perform jobs and deliver goals.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Comparative Public Administration

MSG Team

Classical Theory of Public Administration

MSG Team

Bureaucratic Theory of Public Administration

MSG Team