Cyber Risk in Reinsurance
February 12, 2025
Perceptual illusion occurs when a stimulus is perceived inaccurately. It can equally be explained as a sensory distortion in scientific parlance. How to Describe Illusions? Illusions provide us important clues on the information processing capabilities of our brain. Even scientific investigations by way of empirical researches may have limitations because the information perceived by way […]
Scenario analysis is the third pillar of the framework suggested by the Bank of International Settlements in their Basel norms. In the previous articles, we have already studied a collection of internal and external loss data as well as the self-assessment of risks. However, it is important to note that the loss data collection framework […]
The CAS committee on Enterprise risk management has given the following definition of the same – ‘The discipline by which any organization in any industry assesses, controls, exploits, finances and monitors risk from all the sources for the purpose of increasing organizations short-term and long-term value to its stakeholders’. In simpler terms enterprise risk management […]
What do you understand by Organization culture? Organization culture reflects the working conditions, behaviour of employees, their thought processes, beliefs and so on. Organization culture in a layman’s language is often called as work culture and plays an essential role in extracting the best out of employees. Work culture needs to be healthy for employees […]
The Nature of Political Revolutions An often-overlooked aspect of the modern political economy is the capacity for change and renewal that is inherent in the way modern democracies work. Despite reversals of democracy where world over we are witnessing the retreat of democracy, there have been notable exceptions to the norm wherein some social and […]
The reinsurance industry has been largely fragmented till now. This is why it is common for ceding insurers to buy different reinsurance policies for their different lines of business.
For instance, ceding insurers may buy separate reinsurance policies for their marine business and their property insurance business. In insurance parlance, these lines of businesses are called “towers”.
Up until now, reinsurance was strictly segregated into towers. However, with the passage of time, reinsurance service providers, as well as buyers, have both realized that there are specific advantages to having an aggregate policy that combines different towers instead of having separate policies. These types of reinsurance policies are fairly new and hence are called non-traditional policies.
In this article, we will have a closer look at what are the benefits of combining various reinsurance towers for both the ceding insurer as well as the reinsurance service provider.
Hence, fewer reinsurance companies are willing to provide this cover. As a result, ceding insurers have to pay a higher premium to obtain this coverage. However, when ceding insurance companies combine multiple covers, they are able to obtain this extended coverage easily and at an affordable price. This is why many ceding insurers nowadays prefer to combine multiple towers.
Firstly, due to the overlapping nature of these insurance contracts, it can be very difficult to identify such redundancies. Even if they are identified, it can be very difficult to get these redundancies excluded from any one contract.
Eventually, redundancies can also become a source of conflict when actual payouts have to be made. It is possible for the reinsurers to resort to litigation in order to avoid paying claims.
Hence, when a ceding insurer uses a multi-tower approach, they end up eliminating redundancies. This is one of the reasons why a multi-tower non-conventional reinsurance policy is cheaper than a traditional reinsurance policy.
From a ceding insurer’s point of view, it can become very difficult to meet the minimum capacity requirements in all the towers. This is because the amount of risk underwritten may vary in each tower. It may also vary from year to year.
If the volume of business in a particular tower is low in a given year, then it may be difficult to find reinsurance for the same. Hence, when a ceding insurance company uses a multi-tower non-conventional policy, they are able to circumvent these minimum capacity requirements and reinsurers are legally bound to provide them with services regardless of the quantum of business provided by individual towers.
When ceding insurers sign non-conventional multi-tower policies, they are consolidating all their business into one unit. As a result, the size of the business increases. This makes it attractive to more reinsurance companies. This creates a situation wherein the ceding insurer has a higher bargaining power and hence can demand a better price.
However, ceding insurers need to be careful while selecting their reinsurance partner. This is because non-conventional policies also mean that the ceding insurers' risk will be concentrated with a single counterparty. The economic failure of that counterparty could have disastrous ramifications for the ceding insurer.
Also, the procedure to make the claims may be different in different companies. As a result, a higher degree of complication gets built into the process. These complications can be both cumbersome as well as expensive. It is possible to eliminate this additional effort and expense when a ceding insurer signs a multi-tower non-conventional reinsurance policy.
To sum it up, even though multi-tower reinsurance policies are relatively new, they have been growing rapidly in popularity. Reinsurance companies across the world now have to adjust to this new reality. The failure to do so might lead to loss of market share in the short run and extinction in the future.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *