Time Management Tips for Students
Time Management is nothing but managing time well and doing the right thing at the right time. It is essential for individuals to allocate specific time slots to tasks as per their importance and urgency. Time Management plays a pivotal role not only in organizations but also in an individual’s personal life. Students aspiring for […]
Post Weberian Models of Public Administration
In the previous section we read about the Weberian Model of Bureaucracy and its various aspects, however like all models this one too has its share of criticism and dissection performed by scholars and subject matter experts. The critics of the Weber model said that his theories of bureaucracy heavily discounted the human aspect in […]
The Impact of Insurtech on Reinsurance
Traditional reinsurance companies have always made attempts to minimize risks associated with their business. Most reinsurance companies look at themselves as companies that hold on to risk on behalf of their peers. There are very few reinsurance companies that made investments in insurtech in the early stages of the industry. The few reinsurers which did […]
The Pros and Cons of Unemployment Assistance and Why it Matters in the Present Times
What is Unemployment Assistance and Why it Matters in the Present Times World over, there are many countries that provide what is known as Unemployment Assistance which is essentially a monetary payout to those who are laid off from their jobs. Otherwise known as Dole, Unemployment Assistance helps those workers and professionals who are out […]
Individual Decision Making – Pros and Cons
Individuals have a tendency to think and question before performing. This is fruitful in analysis and forecasting of individual’s behaviour. Individual decision making has certain pros and cons, few of which are mentioned below: Pros of Individual Decision Making An individual generally makes prompt decisions. While a group is dominated by various people, making decision-making […]
In many organizations, it is often the practice to give autonomy to many teams and let them take the decisions that affect their day to day affairs as well as some strategic issues. These are the so-called self-directed teams that exist in all organizations where the managers of these teams take the decisions regarding the management of the team with greater autonomy than the other teams.
These self-directed teams are liked by many managers since there is greater freedom and greater say over their affairs and the rank and file employees also like these teams because it gives them greater control over their work. However, senior management in most cases does not like to cede autonomy and hence there is often a tussle going on between senior management and middle management as far as these self-directed teams and their functioning goes.
The previous articles have discussed how many transnational corporations cede autonomy to regional and divisional heads and let them run their regions or divisions as they see fit. It is the case that within these divisions and regions there is often the tendency to not pass the autonomy down the ranks and instead be as authoritarian as possible. This is indeed a travesty but something which happens in practice in many organizations.
The standard defense that the senior managers in these divisions and regions offer is that the passing down of the autonomy to the rank and file might not be practically possible given the lack of strategic focus and direction that individual teams have which makes them take orders instead of deciding for themselves.
Of course, the intra-organizational tussles that go on between the senior management and the rank and file employees along with the middle managers might make for interesting gossip but in reality these tussles have negative effects on the organizational fabric.
Hence, a possible solution to this issue would be to ensure that sufficient autonomy is ceded to the middle managers without compromising on the strategic imperatives. This can be done if the decision making is decentralized in some functions like HR, Admin, Finance, Operations and Project Management and Project Delivery and at the same time retain control over the overall strategic direction and focus that the company must take.
Though this solution might sound simplistic, in reality this is something that has been actualized in many organizations especially in Fidelity and Unilever where functional and divisional heads as well as regional heads take decisions regarding these activities without interference from the higher ups.
Though there are bound to be some issues that crop up from time to time because of this arrangement, there are some positive benefits to this arrangement. These benefits are to do with the way in which the regional and divisional autonomy manifests in better decisions made about the day to day operations based on local conditions instead of centralized decision making that is top down and done without knowledge of ground realities.
In conclusion, decision making in self-directed teams must be encouraged without ceding complete control over the larger areas of policy and strategy. This can be actualized with some deft planning of the organizational structure and reorienting the organizational culture.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
