MSG Team's other articles

8967 Disadvantages of Private Equity Investment in Sporting Franchises

In the previous article, we have already seen that private equity firms are making a beeline in order to invest in sporting franchises. This is happening because private equity investments seem to have reached the saturation point in other industries. The sporting industry is providing an opportunity for high growth. This is the reason why […]

11132 Role of Investment Bankers in Derivatives Market

The derivatives department is a highly specialized department in the modern-day investment bank. This is because, in terms of size, the derivatives department easily dwarfs all other departments in the investment bank. For instance, the worldwide market for derivative contracts is said to be valued at $79 trillion! This is definitely a notional value since […]

10685 Pre-IPO Investing

An initial public offer (IPO) is a method of selling securities wherein the entire lot of securities is offered for sale to the general public. An IPO is often used by companies when they want to sell their securities to smaller investment organizations and even retail investors. In the past few years, IPOs have seen […]

11630 Calculating Free Cash Flow to Firm: Method #1 (Contd): Treatment of Fixed Capital Expenditure

In the previous article we learned that free cash flow to the firm is closely related to the concept of cash flow from operations. The major difference was in the way free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) treats long term capital expenditures versus how they get treated in the regular cash flow statement. The […]

10778 Profit Maximization vs. Wealth Maximization

When the management of companies is encouraged to change their paradigm from traditional finance to strategic finance, they notice a lot of changes. One of the most prominent changes that are observed is with regards to the concept of wealth maximization. There are many managers who have the opinion that wealth management is a fad […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The dividend discount model also has its fair share of criticism. While some have hailed it as being indisputable and being not subjective, recent academicians and practitioners have come up with arguments that make you believe the exact opposite.

Recent studies have unearthed some glaring flaws in what was considered to be a perfect valuation model.

This article is focused on understanding these shortcomings. This knowledge will help us understand when not to apply the dividend discount model.

  1. Limited Use: The model is only applicable to mature, stable companies who have a proven track record of paying out dividends consistently. While, prima facie, it may seem like a good thing, there is a big trade-off. Investors who only invest in mature stable companies tend to miss out high growth ones.

    High growth companies, by definition face lots of opportunities in the future. They may want to develop new products or explore new markets. To do so, they may need more cash than they have on hand. Hence such companies have to raise more equity or debt. Obviously they cannot afford the luxury of having the cash to pay out dividends. These companies are therefore missed by investors who are focused too much on the dividends.

    For instance, investors following the dividend discount model would never have invested in companies like Google or Facebook. Even, a global behemoth like Microsoft did not have any track record of paying dividends until very recently. Hence, according to dividend discount model, these companies cannot be valued at all!

    Many investors prefer an alternate approach. They try to forecast the time when the growing company will actually evolve into a mature stable business and will start paying out dividends. However, this is extremely difficult.

    The projections become more and more risky as we try to project farther and farther into the future. Thus, we can conclude that the dividend discount models have limited applicability.

  2. May not be Related to Earnings: Another major disadvantage is the fact that the dividend discount model implicitly assumes that the dividends paid out are correlated to earnings. This means that higher earnings will translate into higher dividends and vice versa. But, in practice, this is almost never the case. Companies strive to maintain stable dividend payouts, even if they are facing extreme variations in their earnings.

    There have been instances where companies have been simultaneously borrowing cash while maintaining a dividend payout. In this case, this is a clear incorrect utilization of resources and paying dividends is eroding value. Hence, assuming that dividends are directly related to value creation is a faulty assumption until it is backed by relevant data.

  3. Too Many Assumptions: The dividend discount model is full of too many assumptions. There are assumptions regarding dividends which we discussed above. Then there are also assumptions regarding growth rate, interest rates and tax rates. Most of these factors are beyond the control of the investors. This factor too reduces the validity of the model.

  4. Tax Efficiency: In many countries, it may not be efficient to pay dividends. The tax structures are created in such a way that capital gains may be taxed lower than dividends. Also, many tax structures may encourage repurchase of shares instead of paying out dividends.

    In these countries most of the companies will not pay out dividends because it leads to dilution of value. Any investor who only strictly believes in dividend discount model will have no option but to ignore all the shares pertaining to that particular country! This is one more reason why dividend discount model fails to guide investors.

  5. Control: Lastly, the dividend discount model is not applicable to large shareholders. Since they buy a big stake in the corporation, they have some degree of control and can influence the dividend policy if they want to. Thus, for them, at least, dividends are an irrelevant metric.

Therefore, dividend discount model is not very useful for investors who want to invest in high risk return companies. Also, it may not be in alignment with the tax structures being followed by certain countries.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Calculating Free Cash Flows: The Case of Preferred Shares

MSG Team

Calculating Free Cash Flow to Equity

MSG Team