MSG Team's other articles

10576 The Pay Yourself First Principle

Millions of well-intentioned people around the world try to save and invest money every month but fail. They are consistently unable to hit their financial goals and their savings targets. As a result, they give up and decide to continue living a financially undisciplined life. Financial planners have observed many such cases and then they […]

10056 Issues With the Valuation of Sports Franchises

The valuation of sports franchises is often quoted widely in the public domain. This is generally done based on the valuation provided by the sports franchise itself. The media just published the number that was quoted by the sports franchise. This is because the media is in no position to validate these numbers. Also, since […]

12454 Benefits of Product as a Service (PaaS) Model

The Product as a Service (PaaS) business model is poised to change the business world in a big way. There are many traditional industries that are being disrupted by this model. Start-ups, as well as established corporations, are all taking steps to adopt this model. Many industries such as automobiles and electronics are likely to […]

10487 Objectives of Financial Modelling

Financial modeling enables key personnel to make better decisions. These models are used for various types of decision making. Hence, one model cannot be used for all types of decision making. As a result, several different types of models have to be created. Each of these models’ requires different inputs and provides different outputs. A […]

12467 Bielard, Biel and Kaiser (BBK) Model

The main criticism of the Barnewall model was that it only classified investors into two types. This created an oversimplification. Practitioners of behavioral finance wanted the classification to be more accurate and inclusive. This is the reason why they started creating another psychographic model. This model is called the Bielard, Biel, and Kaiser model, i.e., […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Paperwork Intensive

Job order costing systems have a massive paper trail. They function on the basis of this paperwork. This creates a lot of complications. Companies have to employ a lot of clerical staff to sift through this paperwork and that adds to the overheads that job order costing is trying to minimize.

For every job, there are several documents like quotation, invoice, sales order, materials receipt, labour tickets and so on. They need to be classified and maintained. Of late, information technology has helped in this regard. ERP systems have the option of job order costing inbuilt in them. This helps companies manage their paperwork faster.

Measurement Difficulties

Job order costing is a very powerful concept in theory. But in practice, it is very complicated to implement. These difficulties are multiplied if the organization works out of multiple locations and conducts a wide variety of jobs.

In practice, it becomes difficult to measure the costs that are associated with a particular job. Information technology has helped in this regard too. With barcodes and RFID chips these difficulties can be negated. But these IT systems are expensive to purchase and maintain and add to overheads.

Conflict within the Organization

Job order costing allocates overheads based on an allocation base. This allocation base then leads to an allocation rate which results in overhead costs being allocated to different jobs. Many times companies do not choose the best allocation base. Rather politically powerful managers in the organization choose allocation bases in such a way that it suits their department. Because of the incorrect costing, there is wide-spread conflict and discontent amongst the other departments which end up being charged. Since choosing an allocation base is so subjective, it ends up creating political problems in the organization itself and hampers productivity.

Overheads Based on Estimates

One of the major disadvantages of job order costing is that overheads are based on estimates. At the beginning of a job, overheads are not accurately known. This system, therefore relies on the experience and expertise of certain professionals and on empirical data. Neither of these is a reliable measure.

Past overheads cannot be considered to be a measure of future overheads because prices keep changing. True, that the prices are adjusted to show the effect of inflation and deflation but empirics itself will show that empirical data is far from accurate. Instead, firms can work on more effective ways to find their overhead cost information by studying the current trends in the external marketplace.

Overheads Cannot be Controlled

Also, job order costing does not provide an effective way of controlling overhead costs. Estimates are usually for quotation purposes only. The management is aware that these quotations are seldom accurate and hence they cannot be used as a base for controlling overheads. There are other costing techniques which provide better control over the costs being incurred.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Consequences of Incorrect Job Order Costing

MSG Team

Constraints and Contribution Margin Analysis

MSG Team

Allocating Overheads in Job Order Costing

MSG Team