Equity Theory of Motivation
The core of the equity theory is the principle of balance or equity. As per this motivation theory, an individuals motivation level is correlated to his perception of equity, fairness and justice practiced by the management.
Higher is individuals perception of fairness, greater is the motivation level and vice versa. While evaluating fairness, employee compares the job input (in terms of contribution) to outcome (in terms of compensation) and also compares the same with that of another peer of equal cadre/category. D/I ratio (output-input ratio) is used to make such a comparison.
EQUITY THEORY | |
Ratio Comparison | Perception |
O/I a < O/I b | Under-rewarded (Equity Tension) |
O/I a = O/I b | Equity |
O/I a > O/I b | Over-rewarded (Equity Tension) |
Negative Tension state: Equity is perceived when this ratio is equal. While if this ratio is unequal, it leads to equity tension. J.Stacy Adams called this a negative tension state which motivates him to do something right to relieve this tension. A comparison has been made between 2 workers A and B to understand this point.
Referents: The four comparisons an employee can make have been termed as referents according to Goodman. The referent chosen is a significant variable in equity theory. These referents are as follows:
Self-inside: An employees experience in a different position inside his present organization. | |
Self-outside: An employees experience in a situation outside the present organization. | |
Other-inside: Another employee or group of employees inside the employees present organization. | |
Other-outside: Another employee or employees outside the employees present organization. |
An employee might compare himself with his peer within the present job in the current organization or with his friend/peer working in some other organization or with the past jobs held by him with others. An employees choice of the referent will be influenced by the appeal of the referent and the employees knowledge about the referent.
Moderating Variables: The gender, salary, education and the experience level are moderating variables. Individuals with greater and higher education are more informed. Thus, they are likely to compare themselves with the outsiders.
Males and females prefer same sex comparison. It has been observed that females are paid typically less than males in comparable jobs and have less salary expectations than male for the same work. Thus, a women employee that uses another women employee as a referent tends to lead to a lower comparative standard.
Employees with greater experience know their organization very well and compare themselves with their own colleagues, while employees with less experience rely on their personal experiences and knowledge for making comparisons.
Choices: The employees who perceive inequity and are under negative tension can make the following choices:
Change in input (e.g. Dont overexert) | |
Change their outcome (Produce quantity output and increasing earning by sacrificing quality when piece rate incentive system exist) | |
Choose a different referent | |
Quit the job | |
Change self perception (For instance - I know that Ive performed better and harder than everyone else.) | |
Change perception of others (For instance - Jacks job is not as desirable as I earlier thought it was.) |
Assumptions of the Equity Theory
- The theory demonstrates that the individuals are concerned both with their own rewards and also with what others get in their comparison.
- Employees expect a fair and equitable return for their contribution to their jobs.
- Employees decide what their equitable return should be after comparing their inputs and outcomes with those of their colleagues.
- Employees who perceive themselves as being in an inequitable scenario will attempt to reduce the inequity either by distorting inputs and/or outcomes psychologically, by directly altering inputs and/or outputs, or by quitting the organization.
❮❮ Previous | Next ❯❯ |
Related Articles
- McClellands Theory of Needs
- Goal Setting Theory
- Reinforcement Theory
- Expectancy Theory of Motivation
Authorship/Referencing - About the Author(s)
The article is Written and Reviewed by Management Study Guide Content Team. MSG Content Team comprises experienced Faculty Member, Professionals and Subject Matter Experts. We are a ISO 2001:2015 Certified Education Provider. To Know more, click on About Us. The use of this material is free for learning and education purpose. Please reference authorship of content used, including link(s) to ManagementStudyGuide.com and the content page url.