MSG Team's other articles

12608 Can Cost Cutting Turn Out to be Expensive?

Downturns are part of an economic cycle. Every few years or so, the economy stops growing at a rapid speed. At first, the growth rate decelerates, then stagnates, and finally,, when negative growth appears, a recession officially kicks in. It is no mystery that generating revenues during recessions can be quite difficult. This is the […]

10578 Payment Mechanisms in Public-Private Partnerships

In every public-private partnership, it is the job of the public party to provide remuneration to the private party. There are various mechanisms in which this payment can be provided. In this article, we will discuss the mechanisms which are commonly used in public-private partnerships. User Charges User charges are a commonly used mechanism when […]

11347 Sources of DIP Financing

As mentioned in the previous article, the financing required by companies in order to keep their operations afloat after filing bankruptcy is known as DIP financing. With regard to DIP financing, there is a standard market for lenders who offer DIP financing. There are investment bankers who specialize in helping clients obtain DIP financing. However, […]

12408 The Barnewall Model

The traditional financial theory assumes that all investors are rational. Hence, they believe that all investors will reach the exact same conclusion with regard to investment decisions. However, we see evidence of the opposite happening in the marketplace. Even if different people have the same information, they tend to process the information differently and come […]

12324 The Amazon FedEx Breakup

Amazon and FedEx have traditionally had a love-hate relationship. On the one hand, Amazon is one of the biggest customers of FedEx, whereas, on the other hand, it is also one of their biggest competitors. Amazon has already made its intentions clear. In the long run, they do not want to be associated with FedEx, […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Formula

Equity to Fixed Assets Ratio = Equity / Total Fixed Assets

  • Equity includes the retained earnings
  • Total Fixed assets excludes intangible assets of the firm

Meaning

The “equity to fixed assets” ratio shows analysts the relative exposure of shareholders and debt holders to the fixed assets of the firm. Thus, if the “equity to fixed assets” ratio is 0.9, this means that shareholders have financed 90% of the fixed assets of the company. The remaining 10% as well as current assets and investments have all been financed by debt holders.

Assumptions

There is an implicit assumption that the number of shares outstanding has remained unchanged. This is because the ratio measures the total amount of equity. The total amount of equity can be increased by issuing shares at lower prices to the public or to the promoters. However, this may not be a desirable scenario since more shares means a loss to individual shareholders.

Interpretation

The “equity to fixed assets” ratio is used by a variety of stakeholders for different purposes. The common interpretations that are drawn based on this ratio have been listed below:

  • Creditworthiness: Bankers and other lenders use the “equity to fixed assets” ratio widely. They use it to understand how much of the fixed assets of the firm are already financed by debt. A firm with a low “equity to fixed assets” ratio has not utilized its credit to the maximum and therefore extension of credit is relatively secure. This is because in the event of a liquidation, the creditors have the first claim over the proceeds recovered from the assets.

  • Conservative vs. Aggressive: What might be good news for the bankers may not be such great news for the equity shareholders. This is because if the firm has a very low “fixed assets to equity” ratio, it means that the firm is underutilizing its credit. This means that the shareholders could have achieved a higher rate of return in case the company managed its operations better and used credit to its advantage. Hence a high “equity to fixed assets” ratio is not a very good sign either.

  • Less than 0.65 Not Recommended: Based on empirical evidence, certain analysts have concluded that companies that have a “equity to fixed assets” ratio of less than 0.65 are very risky bets. Companies where shareholders own less than 65% of the fixed assets are likely to cash strapped and debt ridden. These companies usually run into solvency and liquidity issues and therefore must be avoided.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

What are Common Size Statements ?

MSG Team

Cash Ratio – Meaning, Formula and Assumptions

MSG Team