Comparative Public Administration
Comparative public administration focuses on Public Administration as a field of study and research rather simple execution of tasks. Haroon A. Khan defined the Comparative Public administration as a quest for searching patterns and regularities in administrative behavior and action and to characterize them in present day nation states. It is interesting to note why […]
Introduction to Organizational Diversity – Meaning and Important Concepts
We often hear the term “diversity” bandied about in our everyday usage. Usually, when we come across the term, it is in the context of having a mix of gender, race, ethnic, sexual orientation etc in a setting wherein there is no discrimination based on these traits. In an organizational context, diversity refers to equality […]
Transformational Leadership and its Value in the Corporate World
Transformational leadership is one of the many kinds of leadership that is usually on display in the real world. The reason for focusing on this particular type of leadership in this article is to highlight the need for transformational leadership in these tough times when the ability to articulate a vision and motivate the employees […]
Why Business and Political Leaders Must be Institution Builders to Ensure Longevity
What Differentiates Truly Great Leaders from Run of the Mill Leaders? There are leaders who run organizations and nations to secure their position and to make the most of the opportunity to lead them. Also, there are leaders who are visionary but yet lack the capacity or the needed mission capabilities to focus on organizational […]
Strategies to Improve Communication
Effective communication is the process of successful transmission of the message from the sender o the receiver. If the receiver is able to download the message in exactly the same way as the sender intended to do, communication is effective. The receiver must understand what the speaker wants to convey and accordingly must give his […]
Volatility is most likely to remain constant and so is change. The market turbulence has posed challenges to most businesses around the world. But it has also played an important role in the emergence of new and non-traditional businesses – businesses that know how to respond quickly to the changing environment; businesses that have ability to turn information into insights; businesses that how to operate at the edge of chaos.
Business agility is a core differentiator and most companies agree that agility helps them engage a wider audience and generate more revenues. However, at the same time, they also agree that they have not been agile enough to foresee fundamental market shifts. Actually, they experience mixed readiness when it comes to agility.
Business agility is a mind-set. It’s a behavior. It’s the way an individual or organization responds to a stimulus at any given point. It’s the ability to sense change and willingness to respond to it. A stimulus can be financial, technological, social, economical or political. If you’re willing to eliminate resistance to change and are ready to respond to various stimuli, begin with fundamentals. In the previous article, we had discussed the characteristics that an agile business exhibits. Here we study the basic principles basis which an organization achieve those characteristics. Take a look:
Yes, lean management results in quick management. In today’s tumultuous business environment, it’s important to cut down on what is unnecessary to ensure quick execution. Chain of command needs to be shorter and simpler, so that the decisions are taken swiftly. In the digital economy when speed plays an important role, businesses need to cut the hassles and time involved in the approval process.
Wondering what lean management is? It is:
Flexibility is one of the most important fundamentals of organizational agility. The business processes should be simple enough to accommodate change at any stage. However, at the same time standardization is essential because it allows employees to straightaway get into an action, without spending much time in thinking. They need not reinvent the wheel every time they need to use it.
So, what’s the way out? Standardization and dynamism, in such a scenario, go hand in hand. It’s like operating in the middle of chaos and consistency. And how is this done? By defining the processes in such a way that they have scope for flexibility! And this can happen only when the processes are simple. Complexity doesn’t make a space for dynamism. But there are no hard and fast rules. What suits one company may not suit the other. How to balance fluidity and standardization completely depends on the objectives of an organization, nature of business and challenges it faces.
An interdisciplinary team is a group of experts from different fields/ areas of specialty working towards a common goal. It helps businesses benefit from multiple skill-sets and diverse areas of expertise to solve complex problems. Though it’s a coordinated effort but encourages free flow of ideas and information among team members.
Highly agile organizations have multiple interdisciplinary teams as they place more value in human intellect. They encourage their staff to brainstorm, generate ideas and work on them. Serial experimentation and execution is a culture.
People see uncertainty beyond their control and feel terrified with the very idea of it. It puts them in a situation where they feel almost paralyzed to make decisions. And when a crisis happens, they give up most likely. Companies often forget to integrate the agile thinking at middle and lower levels of management. Agility is not a responsibility of top management. It’s important to introduce and promote culture of agility throughout the organization. It’s a combined effort and collective action.
To respond effectively to changes, top management must have a process in place so that everyone from top to bottom can be involved in it. While doing this, it’s important to not let communication lapse. If possible, share the vision with the employees. By this, they become more attentive and extend full cooperation.
Disperse the functions and power away from a central authority. Moderate to highly agile companies take a rather flat approach. They believe in horizontal management rather than vertical management. The accountability to run processes, perform business functions and the power to make decisions is dispersed across the teams, allowing them to manage on their own. Decentralization or flat management is linked to massive participation of employees, which leads to management by results. It ensures:
What stops a company to respond to change is - the inability of its employees to participate in the change management process. Top management ignores the fact that the employees are not ready to change their mind-sets and adapt to the shifting trends. In such a scenario, nimbleness and agility don’t make much sense.
To integrate agility thoroughly, it’s essential to identify the gap at the root level. The true power lies in incorporating an agile mindset. Yes, it’s all in the mind. It begins here and ends here. Businesses must remember that it’s a continuous process.
Conclusion: Given the myriad factors that help organizations become agile, it can be said that an agile mind-set is more required than any other characteristics or traits. Organizations need to strategically implement it and manifest agility all its business processes. They not only need to manage change but must master change management.
Also, agility cannot be achieved overnight. It takes time and effort from employees from top to bottom. Agility is a strategic transformation. In a volatile business environment, only resolve to respond to change can keep organizations at the forefront of competition. And this is what has been keeping companies like Apple, Facebook and Google ahead of their competitors.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
