MSG Team's other articles

11159 Role of Planning, Plans and Planners in Mintzbergs Five Configurations

Role of Planning, Planners, and Plans The previous article discussed the five configurations of organizational structure that Mintzberg proposed as part of his theory. This article examines the role of planning, plans, and planners in each of the configuration. To start with planning is an important element of strategy whenever there is excessive standardization and […]

12186 Why Selling Online is Expensive?

In many countries across the world, small retailers are against e-commerce websites. This is because they believe that these websites use unfair trade practices like predatory pricing in order to put them out of business. However, e-commerce websites refute this charge. They often encourage small retailers to sell on their websites. After all, in theory […]

13016 Customer Acquisition Cost

Customer acquisition cost is the cost which suppliers invest to acquire a new customer. This cost should be always less than the overall value of customer in the entire customer life-cycle. For example, if the cost incurred to acquire a customer is $10, but the contribution of the customer to the profit is only $9 […]

12509 What is Brand Loyalty and How to Develop It

Brand Loyalty is a scenario where the consumer fears purchasing and consuming product from another brand which he does not trust. It is measured through methods like word of mouth publicity, repetitive buying, price sensitivity, commitment, brand trust, customer satisfaction, etc. Brand loyalty is the extent to which a consumer constantly buys the same brand […]

11428 Strategy Evaluation Process and its Significance

Strategy Evaluation is as significant as strategy formulation because it throws light on the efficiency and effectiveness of the comprehensive plans in achieving the desired results. The managers can also assess the appropriateness of the current strategy in todays dynamic world with socio-economic, political and technological innovations. Strategic Evaluation is the final phase of strategic […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Take a look at organizations that are considered to be product leaders in their respective fields like Intel, Google, Microsoft, Apple, GE, 3M, and Phillips etc. It is evident that the Organizations are totally focused on innovation and R&D. Developing, improving and creating products for tomorrow as well as thinking of the future. It is their innate passion and drive to innovate combined with smart management of business that makes them the leaders.

These Organizations that bank heavily on R&D and Design are faced with several challenges in managing the creative developmental process. Apart from having to invest huge sums into R&D, they have got to hire the best talents available in the industry.

More often the creative design and development teams can be quite huge and comprise of hundreds of engineers and scientists working on one project. These Organizations hire the best talent from the Universities and industries and provide them the best environment to work.

To be a product leader, the Organizations have got to have the best performing and most talented teams that can break all boundaries and think of the unthinkable.

Managing and nurturing creativity at individual level and managing large teams of highly creative individuals can be quite challenging. You will see that these Organizations promote an environment that allows teams to think freely, take risks and experiment.

Every idea that the individual or the team comes up with need not fructify as a product. In fact there is an interesting story that is recounted at the University classes about IBM. An employee at IBM happened to think creatively and his experiment cost the Organization thousands of dollars. When his experiment failed, he was called to the CEO’s cabin. Expecting that he would be asked to give in his papers for causing such loss to the Organization, the employee went in ready with his resignation in his hand.

The CEO turned around and said that the Organization had just invested such huge amount in educating the employee and was expecting him to continue to innovate and experiment. This is true of all the Organizations that are innovation and product leaders.

However, allowing people to think and innovate and take risks does not mean that they are not accountable.

On the other hand, these Organizations have perfected the art and process of managing innovation, in managing huge teams developing one product or cross functional teams working on any developmental project. Detailed processes are drawn up to ensure that every idea is captured, qualified, tested and experimented as well as documented.

Managing hundreds of scientists or engineers and multiple teams working closely on any one project or product calls humongous effort on the part of the management to co-ordinate the progress on all fronts. This apart the Organization has got to look at and plan other important functions including manufacturing, marketing and advertising etc at the same time. Moreover, time becomes a very critical factor in such cases.

Managing such challenging environments, ensuring that there are no organizational barriers or bureaucratic tendencies that can hinder the progress at all levels calls for exceptional organizational and management talent and skills on the part of managements.

Managing innovation is not easy. More difficult is the process of commercializing the product as well.

Furthermore, the management cannot lose time or focus on developing the existing product further in order to provide increased product value and product extension and at the same time continue to innovate for the future too.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles