MSG Team's other articles

12337 Anchoring Bias in Behavioural Finance

The average investor may be able to keep their thinking in check and save themselves from a lot of biases. However, they still might not be aware of or be able to manage some of the more advanced biases. The anchoring bias is one such bias. It affects the thinking of even the most sophisticated […]

12621 Capital Budgeting and the Treatment of Inflation

Forecasts Spread Over a Period of Time Inflation is an ever persistent condition in today’s economy. The purchasing power of money has been reducing year after year for decades now. Apart from the occasional recession where money may gain real value, the usual case is a loss of value. Investors are investing money today. They […]

11587 Advantages of Title Sponsorship

In the previous article, we have already understood the meaning of title sponsorship. We also know why it is one of the most coveted forms of sponsorships. We are aware of some of the prominent disadvantages associated with title sponsorship. However, it needs to be understood that there are more advantages to title sponsorship as […]

10198 Longevity Risk and Pension Funds

Advances in medical science have increased the life span of individuals. It is now common for people to live for ten to twenty years longer than their previous generation. This seems like a good development from a humanist point of view. However, from a pension fund’s point of view, a longer life span has several […]

11997 Why Managing Liquidity is Important for Pension Funds?

Pension funds have traditionally been viewed as long-term investors. They are an investment vehicle in which individuals invest over the course of their working lives and remove money only after the age of retirement. Hence, liquidity was not considered to be a very big problem for the pension fund industry until recently. However, in the […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Over the years, the sporting business has quietly metamorphosized into a big business. The amount of money changing hands in the sports business today would have been considered unthinkable even a few years ago.

It is common for franchises to be valued in billions of dollars. Star players also make millions of dollars while playing in the league.

There is one thing that hasn’t changed through the years. The amount of income shown by sporting franchises as taxable incomes has almost stayed constant. The sporting franchises pay so less in taxes that many critics have stated that the billionaire owners of sporting teams pay the smallest percentage of their income in taxes.

The millionaire players also pay a significantly small percentage of their income in taxes. It is the lower echelons of stadium workers and other administrative staff working in these sporting franchises that end up paying the largest chunk of taxes.

In this article, we will have a closer look at some of the reasons why sporting franchises try to understate their income and pay lower income taxes. We will also have a closer look at some of the common methods that are deployed by sporting franchises in order to evade taxes.

Why do Sporting Franchises Understate Their Income?

Sporting franchises understate their income for two primary reasons:

  1. The first reason is obvious. When sporting franchises understate their incomes, they are able to lower their taxable incomes. As a result, they pay low taxes and are able to retain a larger share of their wealth

  2. The second reason is that sporting franchises use these claims of abysmally low incomes in order to negotiate a lower wage with the athletes. The owners of the sporting franchise persuade the athletes to take a lower salary by claiming that the business is not making large sums of money. Hence, they are unable to pay higher wages to the athletes.

The main reason that sporting franchises are able to understate their income is that most of these franchises are structured as private corporations. Hence, they are under no compulsion to reveal their financial data to the public at large.

How do Sporting Franchises Understate Their Income?

There are several complex creative accounting practices that billionaire owners of sporting franchises around the world use in order to understate their income. The details about the most prominent ones have been explained below:

  1. Tax Shield of Purchase Price: The most common accounting loophole used by the owners of sporting franchises is using the purchase price of the sporting franchise as a tax shield. Tax authorities around the world allow franchise owners to amortize a certain percentage of their acquisition price.

    For instance, in the United States, the acquisition price of a sporting franchise can be written off over a period of 15 years. The taxation authorities believe that the vast majority of the value of the franchise is made up of intangible assets such as player contracts as well as broadcast rights and hence allow them to be amortized over time.

    In fact, intangible assets such as brand value are also allowed to be amortized! The end result is that the expenses start appearing very high in relation to the income. Hence, even if the franchise has a high income, it ends up showing a loss to the taxation authorities. This loss does not exist in reality since the entire valuation has been written off over 15 years.

    However, the value of the franchise will not be zero after 15 years, instead, it will have grown several times! Hence, owners of sporting franchises are able to claim depreciation over assets that never actually depreciate in value.

    Also, since the franchise is structured as a private corporation, these losses flow to their personal income statement and they are able to offset their high income in other businesses using these tax laws. In fact, these losses can even be rolled over for a few years in order to offset profits that happen in different years.

  2. Owner Fees: Another common method in which owners lower the income of the sporting franchise is by paying themselves a consultation fee or any other kind of management fee. This is not done to reduce the taxes since the government would end up taxing the income in the hands of the owner. Instead, this is done to artificially increase the operating expense and lower the profits so that they can bargain for lower wages with the athletes.

  3. Paying Group Companies: Not only do the owners pay themselves in order to lower the profits, but they also end up in some of their group companies.

    It is common for the franchise owners to use their own group companies which provide services to the franchise. These services may or may not be required by the franchises. Since the sporting franchise is not a listed company, they do not have to extensively report related party transactions to the tax authorities.

  4. Reallocation of Earnings: Lastly, it has also been observed that sporting franchises deliberately combine the income of a couple of related businesses. For instance, the sporting franchise may also own a part of the stadium.

    The accounting for both these businesses is combined so that the earnings can be reallocated between the highly profitable business and not so profitable business.

It needs to be understood that over a period of time, the government as well as the athletes have become more vigilant. However, the owners of these franchises continue to come up with creative accounting schemes that help them lower their earnings on paper and avoid paying taxes.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Common Issues with Revenue Generated from Broadcasting Right

MSG Team

Issues in Revenue Sharing in Sports Leagues

MSG Team

Sources of Revenue: Broadcasting Rights

MSG Team