Calculating Free Cash Flow to the Firm: Method #2: Cash Flow From Operations
February 12, 2025
Corporate income tax is collected when there is corporate income i.e. when the revenue collected by the corporation exceeds the expenses incurred by this. However, this need not always be the case. It is equally possible that a corporation may incur more expenses than it earns in revenue, thereby incurring a loss. This is truer […]
Quotation: The job begins with a quotation given to a client. For the client, all that matters in the quotation are the costs involved. However, for the contractor, quotation is almost a research document. Giving out quotations requires estimation. Contractors usually have fixed methodologies for estimating these costs. A study of past quotations can tell […]
Lyft is one of the most famous tech unicorns in the world. There was tremendous amount of buzz in the market regarding the Lyft IPO. This is the reason that the company has been able to garner a valuation of close to $24 billion. This astronomical valuation is despite the fact that the company has […]
February 2018 has been a bad month for the United States stock market. In just two consecutive trading days, the market crashed by more than 1500 points. As a result, all the incremental gains that were made in January 2018 were simply wiped out within these two days. It would be incorrect to say that […]
A market is a place where two parties are involved in transaction of goods and services in exchange of money. The two parties involved are: Buyer Seller In a market the buyer and seller comes on a common platform, where buyer purchases goods and services from the seller in exchange of money. What is a […]
Now, since we are aware that there are actually multiple models that can be used to value any given company or asset, the next question that arises is which one should we use? How do we know whether a given valuation model is more appropriate for a given company than the others? The answer is that we don’t know for sure. Because valuation is an art all we have are broad guidelines which we can follow while selecting a given valuation model.
Let’s look at some of those guidelines in this article:
The first and most important factor is the characteristics of the company that is being valued. Consider the fact that we can value a company like Ford Automobiles based on the amount of assets that they control. However, we cannot use the same technique to value a company like Google. Most assets controlled by Google are intellectual and intangible. If they are not complete they may have no use for the acquirer. Hence, the first factor that needs to be determined is whether the company can be subject to valuation based on its assets. If the company has assets that only they can acquire benefit from or if the assets are largely intangible, the asset valuation model needs to be ruled out.
Next, we also need to consider whether or not a company pays dividends. Utility companies for instance have always paid dividends and are likely to do so in the foreseeable future. On the other hand, companies like Microsoft have not paid dividends for a large part of their existence. Hence, while utility companies can be subjected to discounted dividends valuation, companies like Microsoft cannot be valued in the same manner.
Lastly, the purpose of the analysis must be clear to the person conducting the valuation exercise. The valuation for a short term investment will be different from a long term one. Hence, companies that have competitive advantage can be given a higher premium in the short run in the absence of any threat from the competition.
It may not seem that obvious, but the characteristics of the investor also play a big role in which model needs to be selected for valuation.
For instance, consider the case of a retail investor. A retail investor does have ownership of the asset. However, they do not have control over the assets. Hence, they are at the mercy of the dividend policy of the company and cannot predict their cash flows in any other manner. In this case, a discounted dividend approach may be more suitable as compared to other approaches.
Now, consider the case of an institutional investor. Institutional investors have deep pockets and are capable of buying a stake which is large enough to get the management to change the dividend payout policy. In this case, the discounted dividend model may not be very applicable. Instead what matters is the amount of free cash flow that can be generated by the company. Hence institutional investors tend to use discounted free cash flow models more often.
Lastly, if a competing firm makes an acquisition, then they can not only influence the dividend payout policy but the day to day functioning of the firm. Hence valuation here will be more accurate if the discounted residual income model is used.
Lastly, the purpose of investment also plays a major role in the valuation model being chosen.
For instance, consider the case when a conglomerate company makes an acquisition in an unrelated business. Here, the value derived by the investors will be directly related to the value of the assets themselves. The concept of synergy and the increase in value may not be applicable there.
On the other hand, if a competing firm makes an acquisition, they can benefit from the economies of scale and other synergies that come with the acquisition of a business. Hence in this case the concept of synergy may also be applicable.
Also, sometimes investors acquire private companies, only to make an exit by taking them public later on. In such case the valuation will totally depend on the retail investor’s perception of value of that company. Hence, a different valuation model may have to be used.
An important point to note is that investors often use multiple models to derive the valuation of a company, instead of using a single model. The benefit of using multiple models is that the analyst can verify whether they are getting the same or similar measures of value from all models.
If the estimates are not similar, they will still gain a better understanding as to what the root cause of the higher valuation is and whether it is worth the additional premium.
Hence, using multiple valuation models is always preferred to coming up with a valuation based on a single model.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *