MSG Team's other articles

12426 Behavioral Life Cycle Theory

There have been many economic theories developed in order to understand how and why human beings save and spend their resources. Up until now, most of these theories have been developed based on the principles of theoretical finance. The first theory to be put up in this regard was developed by Modigliani in the year […]

11048 Risks in Public-Private Partnerships

In the previous article, we have already seen that building stadiums where professional sports franchises operate is a very expensive and complex task. We have also seen that it is not profitable either for the private entity or the government entity to build such stadiums on their own. In such cases, the public-private partnership (PPP) […]

10714 What is Prime Brokerage ?

History of Prime Brokerage The growth in the number of hedge funds as well as the scale of their operations quickly created the need for a special kind of intermediary that would cater to their needs. This intermediary was the “prime broker”. The prime brokerage business quickly caught the attention of many investment banks as […]

9523 Hedge Funds and Leverage

Leverage is one of the defining features of any hedge fund. Therefore hedge funds have gained expertise in the creation and utilization of leverage. Not only do they use traditional means like equity and fixed income leverage but they also use create leverage with the help of futures, options and swaps. In this article, we […]

8963 Disadvantages of Job Order Costing System

Paperwork Intensive Job order costing systems have a massive paper trail. They function on the basis of this paperwork. This creates a lot of complications. Companies have to employ a lot of clerical staff to sift through this paperwork and that adds to the overheads that job order costing is trying to minimize. For every […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The typical successful start-up obtains funding from various private investors at the earlier stages of the business. Now, these investors do not want to stay with the company forever. They just provide capital to help the company become a full-fledged business.

Once the operations of the company are in order, the private investors generally want to exit. At this stage, the start-up company generally does not have enough money to buy out the shares of the private investors. Hence, the company tends to go for a public issue. This means that the shares which are being held by private investors are offered to the general public for sale. The initial public offer is therefore a viable exit strategy that is used by many start-ups. In this article, we will understand the pros and cons of using IPO as an exit route.

Pros of Using IPO as an Exit Route

IPOs are widely used as an exit route by entrepreneurs. This is because of the fact that there are many benefits to using this approach. Some of the benefits have been listed below:

  • Higher Valuation: The first and most obvious benefit of using an initial public offer as an exit route is that the company tends to get a higher valuation. Many start-up companies have been able to sell their stock at very high valuations in the market. This is because of the buzz surrounding the success of the company in the private market. However, a high stock price is beneficial for all investors. The investors actually selling the shares are able to exchange their shares for a higher amount of cash. The other investors see a notional gain in the value of their assets.

  • Ease of Raising Capital: Once the company gets listed in the stock market, it has permanent access to the market if it wants to raise more capital. This makes it easy for the company to concentrate on finding useful projects where the money can be deployed effectively. Listed companies can raise money very easily since they do not need to find investors and pitch them the company once again. Listed companies can launch a follow-on public offer. If the company is doing well financially, odds are that the offer will be oversubscribed several times.

  • Liquidity for All Investors: Another benefit of using an IPO as an exit route is that it creates liquidity for all investors. Even though some investors may not want to sell their shares immediately after the IPO. However, these investors will always have the option to exchange their shares for cash at very short notice. Most investors find this option valuable since it makes them independent. They do not have to wait for the entire company to be sold. Instead, they can simply sell their own shares whenever they need to liquidate their holdings.

  • Brand Awareness: Another important thing about an initial public offer is that it tends to be a grand affair. Companies that go public spend money to create a brand image. They tend to get a lot of publicity. This helps in creating brand awareness. A lot of the time, this positive brand image spills over to the sales of the company. Many start-up companies have seen their sales go through the roof after their IPO took place.

Cons Of Using IPO as an Exit Route

There are several cons associated with using the initial public offer as an exit route. Some of the cons have been listed below:

  • Pressure to Maintain Growth: A lot of the time start-up companies tend to have unconventional strategies. This means that they often prioritize growth over profitability. As a result, it is common for companies to have negative cash flow.

    As long as these companies are privately held, negative cash flow is not an issue since investors tend to be on board with the overall strategy of the company.

    However, when the company is in the public domain, there is tremendous pressure to generate positive cash flow. This is because once companies are in the public domain, they are expected to work keeping traditional metrics such as cash flow and profitability in mind. Many start-ups may not be comfortable with this since it interfered with their business strategy.

  • Compliance and Admin Costs: As soon as a company goes public, the compliance and admin costs of the company rise rapidly. This is because public companies take money from the general public. Hence, they are under a lot more scrutiny. Also, the law assumes that the officeholders of the company have complete knowledge about the information which needs to be shared with shareholders as well as the regulations which need to be complied with.

    It is not uncommon for companies to appoint several new lawyers, consultants, and even a chief compliance officer to ensure that they are compliant with the law. This can lead to an astronomical increase in overheads which ends up eating into the profitability of the company.

  • Loss of Control: Lastly, start-up companies need to be able to make quick decisions if they want to survive and thrive in the market. However, public companies cannot make decisions very quickly. They are bound by law to disclose information periodically to the public. Similarly, they are bound by law to take decisions only after following a certain procedure. This can create a feeling of loss of control amongst the founders of the start-up and can cause harm to the company if it works in a competitive landscape.

The fact of the matter is that initial public offers are the most popular way for investors to exit a start-up company. However, the pros and cons need to be understood before making a final decision.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Convertible Notes and Startup Funding

MSG Team

Cash Burn Rate: The Basics

MSG Team