MSG Team's other articles

10338 Meeting Etiquette – Codes of Conduct while attending Meetings

Etiquette refers to good manners required by an individual to find a place in the society. It is important for an individual to behave appropriately in public to earn respect and appreciation. One must learn to maintain the decorum of the work place. It is important to respect one’s organization to expect the same in […]

9049 The Economic Costs of MeToo

The MeToo movement has caused ripples across the entire world. The fact that some of the most prominent and powerful men in the world are harassing their female colleagues has been a shocking revelation to many. It has also opened the potential for many lawsuits. Companies that continue to keep accused on their payroll are […]

10130 Leader versus Manager

“Leadership and managership are two synonymous terms” is an incorrect statement. Leadership doesn’t require any managerial position to act as a leader. On the other hand, a manager can be a true manager only if he has got the traits of leader in him. By virtue of his/her position, manager has to provide leadership to […]

12916 Importance of Corporate Dressing

Corporate dressing refers to the art of dressing formally and correctly. Corporate dressing helps an individual to dress according to his work profile and organization culture. Formal dressing, if done correctly goes a long way in shaping one’s personality. People take you seriously if you are dressed sensibly. Remember no one likes to speak to […]

12367 Aristotle Model of Communication

Aristotle was the first to take an initiative and design the communication model. Let us first go through a simple situation. In a political meeting, the prospective leader delivers speech to the audience urging for more votes from the constituency. He/She tries to convince the crowd in the best possible way He/She can so that […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The fourth and last step for risk management suggested by the Bank of International Settlements in its Basel Norms is the continuous monitoring of key risk indicators. Key risk indicators are important metrics that can track the business environment and internal control factors. They can help an organization keep track of a rapidly changing internal and external environment. Risk management is all about continuous scanning and monitoring of the environment and key risk indicators are the best way to do so. In this article, we will have a closer look at what key risk indicators are and how they impact the risk management process.

What are Key Risk Indicators?

In simple words, key risk indicators can be understood to be predictors of adverse events which are likely to impact organizations. Organizations are impacted when their environment changes. Hence, if the changes in the environment are continuously monitored then the changes in the risk exposure can be spotted early. This would help organizations to identify, report and manage risks better than other companies. The best way to think about the key risk indicators is to think about them as the dashboard of a car. The dashboard conveys important information which must be tracked numerically in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the organization from an operational risk point of view.

The main feature of the key risk indicator is that it should be expressed numerically. This also means that there should be a predefined level for these numbers and then when they vary from the predefined level, they should be immediately reported to the risk management team.

Designing the Key Risk Indicators

Key risk indicators can be considered to be the lens through which the company views its internal and external environment. This means that choosing the key risk indicators correctly is of utmost importance while designing the risk management system.

The designing of key risk indicators is quite complex since it requires an understanding of the various objectives of the organization as well as the environmental factors which can hinder the achievement of these organizational goals.

The first step in designing a key risk indicator is to understand the cause-effect relationship between the organization's goals and some root cause factors. The next step is to understand the relative significance that each of these root cause factors has on the overall achievement of the goals. The next step is to create a system that collects high-quality data about these indicators. The data collected must be genuine and there must not be too much time lag between the collection of the data and the passing of this data to the risk management decision-making process.

Also, it is important to ensure that only meaningful indicators are incorporated into the key performance indicator process. If too many metrics are simultaneously tracked, it dilutes focus and the company is not able to pay attention to what is really important. It is also important to determine the trigger levels of the key risk indicators in accordance with the risk appetite of the company that has been aligned during the creation of the risk policy.

Difference Between KRIs and KPIs

Key performance indicators or KPIs are also tools that are used by organizations to manage their day-to-day operations. For instance, revenue being generated, costs being incurred, etc are examples of key performance indicators. However, key performance indicators are not the same as key risk indicators.

Key risk indicators can be thought of as being the precursor to the key performance indicators. The objective of the company is to ensure that the performance indicators are never affected. This is the reason that a separate set of indicators called the key risk indicators are used. The effect of the risk should ideally be shown first in the risk indicators before it starts showing up in performance indicators. If that is not the case, then the system has been designed poorly.

Key Control Indicators

An effective operational risk management system also has key control indicators in place. These indicators help an organization determine the success of its key risk indicators. If the risk indicators are able to catch risks early and maintain control over the operational performance, then that will be reflected in the key control indicators. Key control indicators help a company decide whether its risk indicators are accurate or whether they need to be changed.

Challenges of Key Risk Indicators

The key risk indicator approach is not free from challenges. Some of the commonly faced challenges have been mentioned below:

It may be difficult to identify the key risk indicators for all risks which are faced by an organization. This is because there are certain unknown risks that the organization is not even aware of

It may be difficult to build an automatic system that collects the values and intimates the decision-makers at the correct time.

It is also possible that companies may focus too much on the symptoms of the key risk indicators instead of focusing on the actual root cause.

Lastly, many companies may not have action plans ready. There may be ambiguity about the actions that need to be taken once an action crosses a certain threshold.

The bottom line is that the key risk indicator approach is an integral part of the advanced measurement approach suggested in the Basel norms. This is the reason that this approach is followed widely in different parts of the world.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

The COSO Framework for Internal Control

MSG Team

The Cost Structure in the Insurance Industry

MSG Team

Credit Derivatives: An Introduction

MSG Team