MSG Team's other articles

11052 Robert A Cooke Model of Organization Culture

Individuals from different backgrounds and varied interests come together on a common platform called organization to achieve targets as well as earn bread and butter for themselves. Individuals work in unison towards a common goal. The behaviour of the employees to a large extent depends on the culture of the workplace. How people interact amongst […]

8724 Introduction to Group Behavior in Organizations

Introduction Humans are social animals and hence, form groups wherever they are. This is true for organizations as well as familial and friendship networks wherein people tend to congregate in groups and be governed by the norms and rules of the group. For instance, familial groups impose a certain way of behavior in us as […]

8929 Difference Between a Team and a High-Performance Team

A team comprises of two or more than two people grouped to achieve a common objective or a goal. On the other hand, High-Performance Teams are objectively more focused in approach and better than the usual work teams. The members of a High-Performance Teamwork towards the achievement of synergies in business outcomes and attainment of […]

11165 The Role of Senior Managers as Barriers to Change

It is often the case that when change programs are initiated in firms, there is a level of resistance from senior managers due to a number of reasons. These range from protecting their turfs to uncertainties regarding their position after the change is implemented and to ego clashes as well as power politics. The ways […]

8812 Virtual Team – Origin, Definition and its Scope

In today’s fast pace world, we all lead a virtual life parallel to an actual one. The regular live chats on Skype or status updates on Facebook, which ensure one stays connected with his/her dispersed acquaintances, provide the social platforms for this ‘virtual world’ to exist. When these groups of individuals come together for a […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Rensis Likert and his associates studied the patterns and styles of managers for three decades at the University of Michigan, USA, and identified a four-fold model of management systems.

The model was developed on the basis of a questionnaire administered to managers in over 200 organizations and research into the performance characteristics of different types of organizations.

The four systems of management system or the four leadership styles identified by Likert are:

  1. System 1 - Exploitative Authoritative: Responsibility lies in the hands of the people at the upper echelons of the hierarchy. The superior has no trust and confidence in subordinates.

    The decisions are imposed on subordinates and they do not feel free at all to discuss things about the job with their superior. The teamwork or communication is very little and the motivation is based on threats.

  2. System 2 - Benevolent Authoritative: The responsibility lies at the managerial levels but not at the lower levels of the organizational hierarchy. The superior has condescending confidence and trust in subordinates (master-servant relationship).

    Here again, the subordinates do not feel free to discuss things about the job with their superior. The teamwork or communication is very little and motivation is based on a system of rewards.

  3. System 3 - Consultative: Responsibility is spread widely through the organizational hierarchy. The superior has substantial but not complete confidence in subordinates.

    Some amount of discussion about job related things takes place between the superior and subordinates. There is a fair amount of teamwork, and communication takes place vertically and horizontally. The motivation is based on rewards and involvement in the job.

  4. System 4 - Participative: Responsibility for achieving the organizational goals is widespread throughout the organizational hierarchy.

    There is a high level of confidence that the superior has in his subordinates. There is a high level of teamwork, communication, and participation.

The nature of these four management systems has been described by Likert through a profile of organizational characteristics. In this profile, the four management systems have been compared with one another on the basis of certain organizational variables which are:

  • Leadership processes
  • Motivational forces
  • Communication process
  • Interaction-influence process
  • Decision-making process
  • Goal-setting or ordering
  • Control processes

On the basis of this profile, Likert administered a questionnaire to several employees belonging to different organizations and from different managerial positions (both line and staff).

His studies confirmed that the departments or units employing management practices within Systems 1 and 2 were the least productive, and the departments or units employing management practices within Systems 3 and 4 were the most productive.

Advantages of Likert’s Management System

With the help of the profile developed by Likert, it became possible to quantify the results of the work done in the field of group dynamics.

Likert theory also facilitated the measurement of the “soft” areas of management, such as trust and communication.

Conclusion

According to Rensis Likert, the nearer the behavioral characteristics of an organization approach System 4 (Participative), the more likely this will lead to long-term improvement in staff turnover and high productivity, low scrap, low costs, and high earnings if an organization wants to achieve optimum effectiveness, then the ideal system

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Cultural Dimensions of Leadership

MSG Team

Continuum of Leadership Behaviour

MSG Team