MSG Team's other articles

11666 Types of Employees based on Level of Engagement

An organisation is a collection of individuals who come together and work towards the realisation of a common objective. Larger the number of people working together, larger is the size of the organisation and vice-versa. However, for an organisation to flourish it is important for the employees to operate at their full potential, which unfortunately […]

11144 Role of Managers in Performance Management

The success of performance management practices in any organization depend upon the commitment and involvement of the different stakeholders like top management, line managers, employees and the HR specialists. Role of Top Managers in Performance Management The top managers play a lead in the entire process by setting trends for the lower rung and acting […]

10888 Racial Equality at Workplace

How do you define social exclusion sometimes practiced at workplace with people of color or minorities which technically falls within the ambit of individual preferences? So if the manager does not extend an invitation to go golfing to all members of the team, how can you conclude it is a matter of discrimination rather than […]

10069 Job Analysis Process

Where to place the employees in order to best utilize their skills and talent? How to determine the need of new employees in the organization? How to eliminate unneeded jobs? How to set realistic performance measurement standards? How to identify the jobs and prepare a plan to fill them? Well, all this can be effectively […]

9134 Dimensions of Employee Engagement

The only thing that makes highly productive organisations stand apart from rest of the companies is the quality of the employees and the level of their commitment towards their work. The vice versa, the trust that an organisation shows in their employees and efforts that it makes to keep them focussed, motivated and satisfied, also […]

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The cost of education in America is skyrocketing. It is for this reason that more American policymakers are looking at various options to reduce the costs. They are looking at different models which are being followed in other countries in the world.

It is important to note that America is not the first country in the world where students are demanding free education. In fact, free education has been part of many European countries.

In countries like the United Kingdom and Germany, education was free for the past few decades. However, most of these countries have decided to start charging for education. Very few countries like Sweden still offer free education with zero tuition fees.

In this article, we will discuss the experience of different countries. Finally, some conclusions will be drawn about the applicability of this model to the American education system.

Limiting Enrollment

Basic laws of economics state that when the price of a good or service is reduced, its demand increases. Hence, if the price of a good or service is reduced to zero, then the demand for it increases infinitely. This is what happens when education is made free. Students start flocking in large numbers to universities in order to gain a free education.

The reality is that education can never really be free. This is because young adults have to spend their time in order to obtain an education. Hence, they also lose the wages that they could have earned had they spent that time working. This is the reason why many students don’t come to universities even when education is free. However, the student influx increases greatly.

The problem is that there are only a limited number of seats. Hence, some sort of mechanism has to be created in order to ensure that only a few students are enrolled in college every year.

This is where the systems in America and Germany are different. In America, fees act as the deterrent and decide who will get the admission. On the other hand, in Germany, the decision is made based on the student’s credentials.

The students have to obtain higher grades and also have to do a wide variety of extra-curricular activities in order to be admitted to a college. The German system seems better since it is a meritocracy wherein only the deserving students get a state-subsidized education. Over the long term, the state earns this money back through the tax revenues on the increased income of these students.

Increasing the Teacher to Student Ratio

The teacher to student ratio is very less in most universities in America. This may be good from the standpoint of the quality of education. However, this is not good from an economic standpoint.

Most universities in America have a student to faculty ratio which is ten times less than universities in France. In many universities in France, a class size of 1000 students is also not uncommon.

France gives admission to all students. However, it sets the bar for exams so high that a lot of them fail and have to drop out of college.

Most classrooms in French universities are huge in size when compared to American universities. Hence, low tuition is only possible in France because of the high student to faculty ratio. American universities could replicate this model too. However, most Americans would consider this to be a deterioration of the college experience.

Living at Home

Several pieces of research have been concluded about the cost of education. Many of these researches have concluded that cost of living is a major contributor in many student loans. This means that on an average student loan size increases by 40% when a student decides to opt for a course at a university other than their city.

The case of Germany and Sweden can be used to show the difference. Germany does charge a tuition fee. However, most of the students study in their home cities. Hence, they do not have to incur the additional expenditure that is required to stay in dormitories or in rented accommodations. Also, they do not have to pay extra for food since they get it at home.

On the other hand, there is no tuition fee in Sweden. However, all the colleges are located in Stockholm. Hence, most Swedes have to move out of their homes and stay in rented accommodations in order to complete their education.

The end result is that more Swedes end up in debt as compared to Germans. The student loan debt to income ratio in Sweden is the highest in the entire world. Hence, if Americans want to reduce the cost of going to college, they should encourage students to attend a college which allows them to stay at home and avoid the unnecessary expenditure

Reducing Non-Core Activities

The crux of making education affordable for Americans is to ensure that only a limited number of deserving students get into college. Also, it needs to be ensured that the money is being spent on learning and not on housing and canteen expenses.

Non-core activities like sports must also be funded. However, their budget must be less as compared to academics. This may dramatically alter the college experience that most graduates in America have today. However, this will also produce a lot fewer students who are deeply indebted when they graduate.

Article Written by

MSG Team

An insightful writer passionate about sharing expertise, trends, and tips, dedicated to inspiring and informing readers through engaging and thoughtful content.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Components of a Career Development System

MSG Team

Choosing the Right Business School and Major in the Course

MSG Team