Convertible Notes and Startup Funding
February 12, 2025
In the previous article, we have learned about how corporations use bankruptcy as a strategic tool. However, it is important to emphasize the point that the application of those strategies is 100% legal. This is not the case with all bankruptcy-related strategies. Bankruptcy provides a corporation with substantial relief from the amount it owes. It […]
The purpose of commercial banking is to help corporations meet their funding needs in a better manner. Commercial banks help companies do this in several ways. One such way is related to the concept of reverse factoring. Reverse factoring is a solution that helps large corporations manage their supply chains better by helping optimize the […]
Common size statements are not financial ratios. Rather they are a way of presenting financial statements that makes them more suitable for analysis. However, analysts always use them in conjunction with ratio analysis. In fact, financial analysts use common size statements as the starting point to help them dig deeper. Common size statements tell them […]
Technically, the term hedge fund does not exist. In fact, the term hedge fund applies to any fund which is sold to accredited private investors and does not have to follow through with the regulation process! Now, investment advisory is a highly regulated industry and there are several laws which have been passed to ensure […]
In the previous few articles we have come across different metrics that can be used to choose amongst competing projects. These metrics help the company identify the project that will add maximum value and helps make informed decisions to maximize the wealth of the firm. We saw how the NPV rule was better than IRR […]
We have already learned about the technique of proof of concept in the previous article. However, proof of concept isn’t the only technique that is used by entrepreneurs. There are other techniques that are frequently used as well. Minimum viable product is one of those techniques which is widely used by several entrepreneurs. In this article, we will closely examine the minimum viable product technique as well as the various benefits that it offers.
The concept of a minimum viable product is closely related to proof of concept. However, it is still significantly different. A minimum viable product is a particular version of the product which has maximum utility for the end consumers.
Hence, in order to undertake a minimum viable product exercise, an entrepreneur has to create various versions of their product. They can vary the availability of different features in different products. The end result is to find the specific combination of features that provides the maximum utility to the end consumer per unit of cost.
The objective of the minimum viable product is to reduce the wastage of expenses. Sometimes, entrepreneurs and startups spend a lot of time and money in building features that provide very little utility to the end consumer. The objective of the exercise is to find out the minimum combination of features that must be present in a product for it to be considered viable.
It is important to note that the minimum viable product is different from proof of concept because a tangible product already exists in this case. Also, such a product is available to a wider audience even though it may not be sold commercially. Obtaining the correct combination of features in the minimum viable product is often an iterative process. Entrepreneurs keep repeating this process till they achieve the desired outcome.
As mentioned above, the minimum viable product is often an iterative process. This means that the expenses involved in the process can be much larger than the proof of concept. However, entrepreneurs are still willing to undertake this process because of the following benefits that it offers:
The minimum viable product validates much more than technical capability. It validates the design of the product and the fact that it has a certain degree of market demand at a certain price point.
The minimum viable product approach has one major disadvantage. Companies are often not able to find the correct focus group of customers which represent the target market. Even if customers are randomly chosen, there is a good chance that there may be some form of selection bias which may end up skewing the results of the exercise. This selection bias can cost the money a lot of companies and even some lost reputation.
The company may end up incurring expenses to develop a product that may not even represent the mass market. Hence, it can be said that the end result of the minimum viable product is only as good as the sample selection.
Also, the minimum viable product is not able to replicate the subtle effects which products such as branding and packaging which can have a significant impact on sales and consumer preferences in the open market.
The minimum viable product is generally done after the proof of concept. It is done to finalize the specs of the product after the technology to create the different variations of the product has been validated at the proof-of-concept stage. In short, this is a technique that requires a significant amount of effort as well as expenses upfront but helps in avoiding significant problems down the road.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *